You're right!GopherHockey wrote:I think that backup goalie just tried the stand up kick save on that five hole goal.Nostalgic Nerd wrote:Lookin' like they could score 10+ even with their third and fourth lines.![]()
Class A Semifinal: EGF vs. STA
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
Nostalgic Nerd
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:16 pm
- Location: St. Paul, MN
I don't see how you can say it won't be more of the same tomorrow. I know it wasn't a goal, but hey, so that's what it looks like to see the puck go into the STA goal.jeffpv wrote:Fair enough. However, if they dismantle Hermantown like this tomorrow...well, I think that'd make a pretty strong case.DubCHAGuy wrote:Yes STA has looked like the best puck moving team out there during there playoff run against #90, #68, #29, #59, and #22 in the PS2 rankings. None of the AA teams have been as impressive.
I would have given them a 70% (3AA) or 30% chance (4AA) of even making the AA tourney, depending on what section they played in. And I'd give them around 50-50 odds against each of the teams playing tonight. So yes, I think they could win the AA championship but we'll never know. The AA champ is usually whoever is playing their best against the best competition at the right time and not always the best team.
Bright side is that we'll see next year
-
DekeDangler
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
With all the talk about Oliver being such a great D coach, you would think he would have prepared more than just 2 sets of D to be played. Also, why does he continue to allow certain D to be in the corner or behind the net at the same time? This has been a problem for them the whole year but no one seemed to think it was a big deal because they were winning. I guess they thought they could continue to get away with it when it really counts. I guess it's okay to start playing your extra players after you're behind by 8.
-
thestickler07
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
Because Hermantown is good, give Plante and company some credit.dherman8 wrote:I don't see how you can say it won't be more of the same tomorrow. I know it wasn't a goal, but hey, so that's what it looks like to see the puck go into the STA goal.
The Hawks are a legitimate squad that could skate AA competitively, and they are going to want to redeem themselves after last year's loss.
-
preferhockey
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:07 am
-
karl(east)
- Posts: 6480
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
- Contact:
-
Nostalgic Nerd
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:16 pm
- Location: St. Paul, MN
-
Sue's a girls name
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:30 pm
Dangler - there are different variations of d-zone coverages that don't always have one D in front of the net.DekeDangler wrote:With all the talk about Oliver being such a great D coach, you would think he would have prepared more than just 2 sets of D to be played. Also, why does he continue to allow certain D to be in the corner or behind the net at the same time? This has been a problem for them the whole year but no one seemed to think it was a big deal because they were winning. I guess they thought they could continue to get away with it when it really counts. I guess it's okay to start playing your extra players after you're behind by 8.
I'd say the problem with today's game was the talent level of the STA forwards vs that of the EGF D. This outcome had nothing to do with a defensive coach. Have you ever thought that maybe the number 5 and 6 D for EGF were kept off the ice for a reason - that is, the top 4 couldn't slow these guys down, not sure if that's the time to go further down the depth chart.
-
preferhockey
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:07 am
-
oldschoolpuckster
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:51 am
No you wouldn't. If you were, I feel sad for your kid. This kid only had 3 goals all year!! He scored on 4 today on snap shots from the blue line...preferhockey wrote:Sta d really needed to score that fourth goal. Would be very disappointed if that was my kid
I'll be glad to see STA move up to AA, should have happened two years ago. I only hope that Breck, Hermantown, Lourdes, etc.. follow suit in the near future.
As for tomorrow's game...best of luck Hermantown!! I hope it is a competitive game but STA looks REALLY good.
-
DekeDangler
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
[quote="Sue's a girls name"][quote="DekeDangler"]With all the talk about Oliver being such a great D coach, you would think he would have prepared more than just 2 sets of D to be played. Also, why does he continue to allow certain D to be in the corner or behind the net at the same time? This has been a problem for them the whole year but no one seemed to think it was a big deal because they were winning. I guess they thought they could continue to get away with it when it really counts. I guess it's okay to start playing your extra players after you're behind by 8.[/quote]
Dangler - there are different variations of d-zone coverages that don't always have one D in front of the net.
I'd say the problem with today's game was the talent level of the STA forwards vs that of the EGF D. This outcome had nothing to do with a defensive coach. Have you ever thought that maybe the number 5 and 6 D for EGF were kept off the ice for a reason - that is, the top 4 couldn't slow these guys down, not sure if that's the time to go further down the depth chart.[/quote]
This is true. Their d-coverage today wasn't working for them and they made no adjustments. I lost track of the goals that came from both D being in the corner or behind the net.
11-0 outcome has nothing to do with the coaches? So, it's not the coaches fault, it's not the players fault, it's all because the other team was that much better. I guess all the talk about EGF's defensive core was all smoke this year. I guess all the talk about their depth was all smoke this year. If the 5 and 6 D were kept off for a reason, it was because someone failed to develop and prep them for it.
STA is a great team, but should be able to be held back a little more by a team of EGF with the quality of players that they have.
Dangler - there are different variations of d-zone coverages that don't always have one D in front of the net.
I'd say the problem with today's game was the talent level of the STA forwards vs that of the EGF D. This outcome had nothing to do with a defensive coach. Have you ever thought that maybe the number 5 and 6 D for EGF were kept off the ice for a reason - that is, the top 4 couldn't slow these guys down, not sure if that's the time to go further down the depth chart.[/quote]
This is true. Their d-coverage today wasn't working for them and they made no adjustments. I lost track of the goals that came from both D being in the corner or behind the net.
11-0 outcome has nothing to do with the coaches? So, it's not the coaches fault, it's not the players fault, it's all because the other team was that much better. I guess all the talk about EGF's defensive core was all smoke this year. I guess all the talk about their depth was all smoke this year. If the 5 and 6 D were kept off for a reason, it was because someone failed to develop and prep them for it.
STA is a great team, but should be able to be held back a little more by a team of EGF with the quality of players that they have.
I'll start by saying I've only seen the two previous televised egf games; the Lourdes game, and their section title game.Sue's a girls name wrote:Dangler - there are different variations of d-zone coverages that don't always have one D in front of the net.DekeDangler wrote:With all the talk about Oliver being such a great D coach, you would think he would have prepared more than just 2 sets of D to be played. Also, why does he continue to allow certain D to be in the corner or behind the net at the same time? This has been a problem for them the whole year but no one seemed to think it was a big deal because they were winning. I guess they thought they could continue to get away with it when it really counts. I guess it's okay to start playing your extra players after you're behind by 8.
I'd say the problem with today's game was the talent level of the STA forwards vs that of the EGF D. This outcome had nothing to do with a defensive coach. Have you ever thought that maybe the number 5 and 6 D for EGF were kept off the ice for a reason - that is, the top 4 couldn't slow these guys down, not sure if that's the time to go further down the depth chart.
Having said that, both games left me wondering what all the hubbub about this team was about.
Seemed more or less average team to me.
Crazy game today though.
-
loveitorleaveit
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:52 pm
-
Air Force 1
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:22 pm
- Location: East Grand Forks
I think Plante is great and I think Hermantown is a solid squad. They can skate competitively with some AA schools but beating them is another story. I said this before the tournament started and I'll say it again. This STA team is better than last year. With that said I find it hard to argue that this Hermantown team is better than last year and I don't think I would even say they are as good as last year's team. When the two met last year it ended 5-1 and I thought STA had Hermantown overmatched. Hermantown can want to redeem themselves as much as their hearts desire but the game won't be in doubt. They may keep it close for a while, they may be ahead for a while, but in the end you'll see the gap even if it doesn't totally show on the scoreboard. I'll say STA will win by 5 but I hope I'm wrong.thestickler07 wrote:Because Hermantown is good, give Plante and company some credit.dherman8 wrote:I don't see how you can say it won't be more of the same tomorrow. I know it wasn't a goal, but hey, so that's what it looks like to see the puck go into the STA goal.
The Hawks are a legitimate squad that could skate AA competitively, and they are going to want to redeem themselves after last year's loss.
-
northwoods oldtimer
- Posts: 2679
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:01 pm
-
groundpoundinggrunt
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:58 am
It was a tough game to watch, ecspecially from so far away. STA is a very talented team and I can see why they are going 2A. I was very proud of the way those EGF boys played. Didn't give up, kept their heads up and battled until the very end. Just wasn't their day today. Finish off strong tomorrow and walk away from the "X" with some knowledge and begin to formulate a plan of attack for next year. GO GREEN WAVE!
By the way, 1 minute left in the game and the camera pans to the EGF fans......they're losing 11-0 and acting as if they are 5 ahead. That's right, I'm from EGF and I'm damn proud of those kids! Once again...GO GREEN WAVE!
By the way, 1 minute left in the game and the camera pans to the EGF fans......they're losing 11-0 and acting as if they are 5 ahead. That's right, I'm from EGF and I'm damn proud of those kids! Once again...GO GREEN WAVE!
Loved the EGF fans!!! True sportsmanship at it's finest. This is exactly what the A class was destined for. I never really bothered with the private vs public school argument. But today, I am firmly believing that privates should not play this tourney.
Question for those in the know. Do the private schools have to pay to be part if this? If public schools are losing funding with each student who leaves for private schools, why should they allowed to participate in a public school event?
Question for those in the know. Do the private schools have to pay to be part if this? If public schools are losing funding with each student who leaves for private schools, why should they allowed to participate in a public school event?
-
DekeDangler
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
changes not made in the Breck game
It looks like EGF hasn't made any changes to their D coverage. Two D in a corner still isn't working for them.
Re: changes not made in the Breck game
That is strange at this level, to not have one d always in front of the net.DekeDangler wrote:It looks like EGF hasn't made any changes to their D coverage. Two D in a corner still isn't working for them.