2013-14 KRACH RANKINGS - NOW ON MGHCA WEBSITE

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Sun Dec 01, 2013 1:28 am

Updated 12/01 - 1AM

Slap Shot · Post by **Slap Shot** » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:30 am

I know total games played equals out in the end, but it's odd that some teams have played as many as 10 games and others as 'few' as 5.

AAA Dad · Post by **AAA Dad** » Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:01 pm

Slap Shot wrote:I know total games played equals out in the end, but it's odd that some teams have played as many as 10 games and others as 'few' as 5.

What is your point!!??

MNHockeyFan · Post by **MNHockeyFan** » Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:11 am

ghshockeyfan wrote:Updated 12/01 - 1AM

Most Recent Ranking Links:
==========================================
CLASS A:
http://www.bgoski.com/KRACH_A.htm

I don't recall a previous KRACH Class A ranking where there was no Metro-area team in the Top 5. As far back as I can remember either Blake or Breck - and usually both - were right up there.

And when was the last time that Warroad was not in the Top 10?

Otter · Post by **Otter** » Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:53 am

EGF! EGF! EGF!
TRF! TRF! TRF!

The little Ralph is gonna be rockin' tomorrow night!

Slap Shot · Post by **Slap Shot** » Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:24 pm

AAA Dad wrote:
Slap Shot wrote:I know total games played equals out in the end, but it's odd that some teams have played as many as 10 games and others as 'few' as 5.
What is your point!!??

That the early season disparity of games played is bizarre. I don't ever recall the difference being more than a few games. In other words just a curious observation that I assumed wasn't cryptic.

MinnGirlsHockey · Post by **MinnGirlsHockey** » Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:30 pm

Slap Shot wrote:
AAA Dad wrote:
Slap Shot wrote:I know total games played equals out in the end, but it's odd that some teams have played as many as 10 games and others as 'few' as 5.
What is your point!!??
That the early season disparity of games played is bizarre. I don't ever recall the difference being more than a few games. In other words just a curious observation that I assumed wasn't cryptic.

I agree and thought it was a good point. In November, Edina played 10 games while Hill and NWC played only 3 games. So there is a much larger sample size thus far with some teams vs. others. I'm not a mathematician, but I'd think the current KRACH ranking is more reliable (i.e. less chance of changing dramatically) for the teams who've already played 8-10 games vs. the teams who've played only 3 or 4.

royals dad · Post by **royals dad** » Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:26 am

Slap Shot wrote:
AAA Dad wrote:
Slap Shot wrote:I know total games played equals out in the end, but it's odd that some teams have played as many as 10 games and others as 'few' as 5.
What is your point!!??
That the early season disparity of games played is bizarre. I don't ever recall the difference being more than a few games. In other words just a curious observation that I assumed wasn't cryptic.

I have been thinking the same thing, eventually some teams are going to get slammed with back to back 3 game weeks. Those can be a grind and coaches end up with all pre game skates and little or no solid practice time. I know for my daughters team they had a couple really slow weeks after starting with a bunch of games, partially due to the late Bloomington co-op. Schedule just seems a bit odd this year.

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:04 pm

Updated 12/04 - 6PM

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:14 pm

I see Minnehaha got wiped out (0-0-0) record - I'll have to fix that, team name must have changed in the last few days on the Hub...

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:40 pm

ghshockeyfan wrote:I see Minnehaha got wiped out (0-0-0) record - I'll have to fix that, team name must have changed in the last few days on the Hub...

Actually - a few teams had name changes recently that I'll have to address...

57 Cloquet/Esko/Carlton 0-0-0 9.999 AA 7
58 Minnehaha 0-0-0 9.999 A 4
59 Park 0-0-0 9.999 AA 3
60 Rochester JM/Lourdes 0-0-0 9.999 AA 1
61 Sartell/Sauk Rapids 0-0-0 9.999 AA 8

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:16 pm

Updated 12/04 - 10PM for LPH ranks and a few team name changes on the Hub.

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:28 am

Updated 12/05 - 11PM

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:40 pm

Updated 12/07 - 9AM

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:10 pm

Updated 12/08 - 2PM

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:21 am

Updated 12/11 - 12AM 5909

Marty · Post by **Marty** » Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:38 pm

Hill will climb. They have a tough pre-conference schedule and they need to !

The question is not whether Hill will run the table in their conference, the question is

Will Hill give a goal in the Classic Suburban Conference ?

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:18 am

Updated 12/14 - 9AM 6736

MinnGirlsHockey · Post by **MinnGirlsHockey** » Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:27 am

Marty wrote:Hill will climb. They have a tough pre-conference schedule and they need to !

The question is not whether Hill will run the table in their conference, the question is

Will Hill give a goal in the Classic Suburban Conference ?

They gave up a goal last night vs. NSP....

pucktech · Post by **pucktech** » Sun Dec 15, 2013 1:07 am

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Sun Dec 15, 2013 1:09 am

pucktech wrote:Chaska/Chan over New Ulm 3 - 1...on 12-13-13...not posted up on the Hub for some reason...I see you don't have this game added into your figures...

Check and see if it made the latest ranking - if not, it didn't yet get entered on the Hub/MGHCA and one of the teams will need to do so.

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Sun Dec 15, 2013 1:11 am

Updated 12/15 - 12AM 7037

pucktech · Post by **pucktech** » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:27 pm

ghshockeyfan wrote:
pucktech wrote:Scores...not posted up on the Hub for some reason...I see you don't have this game added into your figures...
Check and see if it made the latest ranking - if not, it didn't yet get entered on the Hub/MGHCA and one of the teams will need to do so.

http://www.minnesota-scores.net/gamerec ... eid=858999

Saw the 3 - 1 score is posted correct on Minnesota-scores.net but still not posted on Hub/MGHCA.
You've probably explained it before but now I know.

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:47 pm

pucktech wrote:
ghshockeyfan wrote:
pucktech wrote:Chaska/Chan over New Ulm 3 - 1...on 12-13-13...not posted up on the Hub for some reason...I see you don't have this game added into your figures...
Check and see if it made the latest ranking - if not, it didn't yet get entered on the Hub/MGHCA and one of the teams will need to do so.
http://www.minnesota-scores.net/gamerec ... eid=858999

Saw the 3 - 1 score is posted correct on Minnesota-scores.net but still not posted on Hub/MGHCA.
You've probably explained it before but now I know.

I've found scores/records to be inconsistent at times between the two sites. The teams have control over the hub I believe so should be able to update. Mn scores just takes a quick online form submission or email and usually they post or fix quickly.

ghshockeyfan · Post by **ghshockeyfan** » Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:41 pm

Updated 12/18 - 10PM 7891

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com