I saw a picture of a 5 year old training at AA/NE. Slacker!stromboli wrote:Nope, just hockey players in development to be my future retirement source as NHLers, or maybe NHL coaches. The mite might have to work a little harder than the other two, but she should have a shot if she just commits to my master 10 year plan for her development.Minnesota57 wrote:I guess you are right.old goalie85 wrote:Your very odd !!! Most people w/multiple kids do. I refer to m9ine the same way. AND I'm normal !!!!
How is your Chevy Blazer driver?, Your 4th hour social studies student? Your movie-goer? Your ham sandwich eater? And your magazine seller?
Not odd at all.
I would hope your sons and daughters are a bit more than a "bantam" to you. Perhaps not.![]()
Tier 1 AAA against MN Assoc this weekend and next....
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
Nevertoomuchhockey
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:59 pm
You sir are the odd one. You are on a youth hockey message board which the primary intent and purpose is to discuss youth hockey. Further there is a very good "rule" on this site to not call youth players by name, I do have more than one hockey player and we were discussing Bantam age kids in this thread so since this is a youth hockey forum and I do not wish to call my son by name I referred to him as "my bantam". No differently than I might refer to him as "my 8th grader" if I was discussing school subjectss with another parent, or I might call him "my U14" if I was discussing his soccer team (again to differentiate him from his younger brother and sister who also play those sports and also to provide context to the person I am speaking to)..... Considering the context it is neither odd, nor strange and nor do I pigeon hole my son in real life as any "one" thing. Someone coming on to a message board devoted to hockey and calling someone out as "odd" for referring to their child within their player age group within proper context is the odd thing, if you are that "dense" this does not sound like the right place for you. Good day sirMinnesota57 wrote:I guess you are right.old goalie85 wrote:Your very odd !!! Most people w/multiple kids do. I refer to m9ine the same way. AND I'm normal !!!!
How is your Chevy Blazer driver?, Your 4th hour social studies student? Your movie-goer? Your ham sandwich eater? And your magazine seller?
Not odd at all.
I would hope your sons and daughters are a bit more than a "bantam" to you. Perhaps not.
Last edited by JSR on Thu Dec 26, 2013 11:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
old goalie85
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
-
Minnesota57
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 3:07 pm
Thanks for your analysis, Mr. Pot.JSR wrote:Someone coming on to a message board devoted to hockey and calling someone out as "odd" for referring to their child within their player age group within proper context is the odd thing, if you are that "dense" this does not sound like the right place for you. Good day sir
I'll just go ahead and make my own decisions on what the "right place for me" is.
You may want to check with "your bantam" for your own direction.
-
MrBoDangles
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
And you're our new HSHF village idiot.Minnesota57 wrote:Thanks for your analysis, Mr. Pot.JSR wrote:Someone coming on to a message board devoted to hockey and calling someone out as "odd" for referring to their child within their player age group within proper context is the odd thing, if you are that "dense" this does not sound like the right place for you. Good day sir
I'll just go ahead and make my own decisions on what the "right place for me" is.
You may want to check with "your bantam" for your own direction.
-
HockeyDad41
- Posts: 1238
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:40 pm
Great. I was tired of that title anyway.MrBoDangles wrote:And you're our new HSHF village idiot.Minnesota57 wrote:Thanks for your analysis, Mr. Pot.JSR wrote:Someone coming on to a message board devoted to hockey and calling someone out as "odd" for referring to their child within their player age group within proper context is the odd thing, if you are that "dense" this does not sound like the right place for you. Good day sir
I'll just go ahead and make my own decisions on what the "right place for me" is.
You may want to check with "your bantam" for your own direction.
Solving all of hockey's problems since Feb 2009.
-
MrBoDangles
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Sorry, but you've really been slacking lately...HockeyDad41 wrote:Great. I was tired of that title anyway.MrBoDangles wrote:And you're our new HSHF village idiot.Minnesota57 wrote: Thanks for your analysis, Mr. Pot.
I'll just go ahead and make my own decisions on what the "right place for me" is.
You may want to check with "your bantam" for your own direction.
-
Minnesota57
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 3:07 pm
Back to the original topic, just met a Dad whose son is with the 99 AAA Carolina Jr. Hurricanes. They are playing Stillwater, Buffalo, Tonka, and Edina BAA this weekend. They are no joke....ranked #6 or 7 nationally, and the head coach is a former Mr. Hockey, ably assisted by a certain Rob Brind'amour.
-
fastncrash
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:42 pm
I had the chance to watch them play in Pittsburgh a couple weeks back. Nice team. Upper echelon team, no,... but nice and seemed to be Coached well.57special wrote:Back to the original topic, just met a Dad whose son is with the 99 AAA Carolina Jr. Hurricanes. They are playing Stillwater, Buffalo, Tonka, and Edina BAA this weekend. They are no joke....ranked #6 or 7 nationally, and the head coach is a former Mr. Hockey, ably assisted by a certain Rob Brind'amour.
-
MrBoDangles
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
-
old goalie85
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
There is no "pot and kettle" scenario here. There is literally just you on an island, all alone, digging yourself a deeper and deeper hole....Minnesota57 wrote:Thanks for your analysis, Mr. Pot.JSR wrote:Someone coming on to a message board devoted to hockey and calling someone out as "odd" for referring to their child within their player age group within proper context is the odd thing, if you are that "dense" this does not sound like the right place for you. Good day sir
I'll just go ahead and make my own decisions on what the "right place for me" is.
You may want to check with "your bantam" for your own direction.
I actually think it is great too og85, just as I thought it was great when Edina went to Detroit last year. I hope we see more of this int he coming seasons, could be great for the sport!old goalie85 wrote:This is great. All these teams flying/driving across the country to play our community based assc. teams.
Edina PW against Tier I
Rumor has it that Edina PW is going to Border Battle tournament next weekend where they will play mid ranked Tier I teams. Also hearing rumors that #3 PW Chicago Mission team is coming to Minny for 2 games vs. Edina and then 3 games vs. others.
-
old goalie85
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
-
SCBlueLiner
- Posts: 665
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:11 pm
That's the way I took it as well. Look at what has been happening. Tier 1 teams, recruited All-Star teams if you will, have been paying thousands of dollars and traveling hundreds of miles to come to Minnesota to play community based teams, and have been losing. Tells you something about the quality of hockey in the state and elsewhere.old goalie85 wrote:My point is.... They will come to us !!!![]()
![]()
We are GOOD ta go . Just the way it is....
No need to go anywhere as there is high quality hockey right here.
JUst to be clear, the idea that Tier 1 is "recruited allstar teams" is a bit of a misnomer outside of a very select few. I'd say he Mission for example fits that definition and a few others but I would say that definition does not apply to the majority. The majority are more likely defined as collections of kids who have above average skill but play in areas with way way below average hockey teams and coaches and they look to play in places with better coaching and better talent around them, but I call it a misnomer because there are tons of kids from the areas where the Tier 1 teams exist that are way better than the kids on the Tier 1 team but for whatever reason choose not to play there. The point being MN is the strongest hockey state and no one I have ever met argues against that but you should be clearer on what Tier 1 really is and what it is not.SCBlueLiner wrote:That's the way I took it as well. Look at what has been happening. Tier 1 teams, recruited All-Star teams if you will, have been paying thousands of dollars and traveling hundreds of miles to come to Minnesota to play community based teams, and have been losing. Tells you something about the quality of hockey in the state and elsewhere.old goalie85 wrote:My point is.... They will come to us !!!![]()
![]()
We are GOOD ta go . Just the way it is....
No need to go anywhere as there is high quality hockey right here.
-
old goalie85
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
I agree. The Madison, WI area is also at a tipping point right now in that regard, not sure which way it's going to tip yet, if association base is going to start to reign supreme or if Tier 1 is going to improve and retake the reigns. Not sure yet but its obviously teetering down here as well.....old goalie85 wrote:I understand. I think western Wis/ND are quickly becoming very strong community based regions as well>