St Thomas (7-3-1) @ Benilde (9-3-2) 1-7-14 7pm
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Totally agree, this program is in a complete tailspin ,I mean my god the have lost to hill Murray,Burnsville, and now Benilde not only will CDH beat them which hasn't happen in about 10 straight games I would be suprised if they can even get by Richfield or Sibley, this is a complete and uter breakdown
-
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm
Ah, talk on campus is that we're young. Some say we won't go to the X, others say we could make it to the semi's. Personally, I think this team is too inexperienced.
To say we're in a "complete tail spin" is a bit dramatic. Yeah we lost to Hill, but we also could only beat them once last year- a year with one of our best team's in a while. Also, we're laying it on SSP right now at 4-0 in the first - a team that beat Sibley by one goal.
Could be a interesting year next year if Versich and Novak stay. Hallet would have some more experience and the team would be fairly well bonded. Then again, it is possible to find a groove late in the season here and build some momentum going into February.
At least nobody expects a 4-Peat...
To say we're in a "complete tail spin" is a bit dramatic. Yeah we lost to Hill, but we also could only beat them once last year- a year with one of our best team's in a while. Also, we're laying it on SSP right now at 4-0 in the first - a team that beat Sibley by one goal.
Could be a interesting year next year if Versich and Novak stay. Hallet would have some more experience and the team would be fairly well bonded. Then again, it is possible to find a groove late in the season here and build some momentum going into February.
At least nobody expects a 4-Peat...
Thanks baurman! Never said they were in a complete tailspin, nor did I say they weren't a good hockey team. Just my opinion that they won't be in St. Paul in March. I also don't think they will win a title in AA for a very long time. Perhaps you need thicker skin?bauerman wrote:Maybe I was being a little sarcastic, I'm obviously not as observant as Stats81puckbreath wrote:I take it you're needing a sarcasm emoticon for your post, bauerman ?
It's still a very good team of course.
-
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm
We shall see. I could be eating crow too. Just my opinion though.MNHockeyFan wrote:While your first opinion may well prove to be true, I think you're climbing pretty far out on the limb with your second one.Sats81 wrote:Just my opinion that they won't be in St. Paul in March. I also don't think they will win a title in AA for a very long time.
I'm thinking crow. I counted 3 seniors that play regularlySats81 wrote:We shall see. I could be eating crow too. Just my opinion though.MNHockeyFan wrote:While your first opinion may well prove to be true, I think you're climbing pretty far out on the limb with your second one.Sats81 wrote:Just my opinion that they won't be in St. Paul in March. I also don't think they will win a title in AA for a very long time.
10-12 returning jurors including both goalies. Just my opinion.
-
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm
-
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:12 pm
-
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm
Oh, I'm sure he's just there for the academicsNuts&Bolts wrote:It seems the only top team in the state with a hand-picked recruit from other parts of the world would be Burnsville. A great way to avoid MSHSL transfer rules apparently is to host an exchange student that is a talented hockey player. Other schools should take note to supplement there rosters.

-
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm
Here's hoping your right with your predictions !Sats81 wrote:We shall see. I could be eating crow too. Just my opinion though.MNHockeyFan wrote:While your first opinion may well prove to be true, I think you're climbing pretty far out on the limb with your second one.Sats81 wrote:Just my opinion that they won't be in St. Paul in March. I also don't think they will win a title in AA for a very long time.

-
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm
I don't know; if he "didn't see" a controversial crucial play, at a crucial time, in last year's championship game, maybe he'd miss this tooMNHockeyFan wrote:Pretty sure the returning jurors and Judge Vanelli would agree!bemused wrote:10-12 returning jurors including both goalies. Just my opinion.

-
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:12 pm
-
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm