Section 3A (2013-2014)

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

hawkenjonny wrote:Some might say playoff prep. Most would say stat padding which Luverne gets hammered for all the time on this forum and off. Starting to see why. This is TYPICAL play for them not just a playoff prep situation. Top two lines score repeatedly in blowout games late in the game. :roll: Whatever makes you feel better.

Hawkenjonny you better geat bylsma on the horn. The Slovaks's are getting blown out in the second period.

STOP SCORING AMERICA!! YOUR MAKING US LOOK BAD!!!!
gopherfan7
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 10:22 pm

Post by gopherfan7 »

notTONIGHT wrote:
hawkenjonny wrote:Some might say playoff prep. Most would say stat padding which Luverne gets hammered for all the time on this forum and off. Starting to see why. This is TYPICAL play for them not just a playoff prep situation. Top two lines score repeatedly in blowout games late in the game. :roll: Whatever makes you feel better.

Hawkenjonny you better geat bylsma on the horn. The Slovaks's are getting blown out in the second period.

STOP SCORING AMERICA!! YOUR MAKING US LOOK BAD!!!!
you're**

There's that great Luverne education at its finest! :lol:
hawkenjonny
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:36 pm

Post by hawkenjonny »

Olympics, NHL, Playoffs, I say stop us if you can. High school regular season top two lines pounding in multiple goals with less than 5-6 minutes left in a run time game (or 2 seconds left in one case I heard about) I stand by my earlier statement. JMO don't have to agree Herb! Also, thanks for the thoughts on what it might take for Luverne to come through their section. I agree, pretty basic formula to stop them or anyone. Hopefully they can play their game and continue what has worked so far.
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

gopherfan7 wrote:
notTONIGHT wrote:
hawkenjonny wrote:Some might say playoff prep. Most would say stat padding which Luverne gets hammered for all the time on this forum and off. Starting to see why. This is TYPICAL play for them not just a playoff prep situation. Top two lines score repeatedly in blowout games late in the game. :roll: Whatever makes you feel better.

Hawkenjonny you better geat bylsma on the horn. The Slovaks's are getting blown out in the second period.

STOP SCORING AMERICA!! YOUR MAKING US LOOK BAD!!!!
you're**

There's that great Luverne education at its finest! :lol:
Grammar police. How eloquent.

I now know everything I need to know about you.
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

notTONIGHT wrote:
MrGoalieBoy wrote:
notTONIGHT wrote:Sounds like Saturday for seed announcement boys.
Did the coaches already meet? Or?
From my understanding, there is no in person meeting. They send in their seedings, and compile them.

One of the coaches made an error on their ballot. This is causing a delay.

Thats all i know.
There was a meeting, Sunday in New Ulm.

I was incorrect.

Not sure what the delay is about then.
yesTONIGHT
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:04 pm

Post by yesTONIGHT »

notTONIGHT wrote:
gopherfan7 wrote:
notTONIGHT wrote:
Hawkenjonny you better geat bylsma on the horn. The Slovaks's are getting blown out in the second period.

STOP SCORING AMERICA!! YOUR MAKING US LOOK BAD!!!!
you're**

There's that great Luverne education at its finest! :lol:
Grammar police. How eloquent.

I now know everything I need to know about you.
Went to the thesaurus eh Herbie
RRubberbeeskit
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:23 am

Post by RRubberbeeskit »

fastncrash wrote:
Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:Teak,

Good point I did not see that game in Marshall however, I was at the game in Gustavus where Campion and the Tigers shut down Luverne. Luverne had Superior talent and could not get the job done. I Luverne feel, as everyone knows, is always over-hyped. 4 years ago no one had ever even heard of them. Then they have had some nice runs over the past 3 seasons putting up 17, 21 and 22 wins seasons. I just don't see them being a factor this year. Last year was the best team they ever had and they crumbled in the spotlight. You will more likely start see them decline now much like Redwood Valley did.

I know they have a great feeder program and they have a some dynamite individual players. However, heard in the youth they allow South Dakota players on their teams which may inflate the value of their youth success. They do have some great kids coming up but factor in my example below:

Keep an eye out though for another young sensation Luverne will reveal this year. Have seen this kid he is the real deal but..... How long will he even stay at Luverne? Look at the Schaeffer kid in Marshall played as an 8th grader then left the program. Those are killers have heard this kid maybe on the same route. One and done.

When He leaves after his 8th grade year and the Sengvongxay kid leaves either this year or before his senior year and the Smedsrud kid leaves early they kill your program. If these kids would all stay then your looking at them being a contender down the road but from the sources that be in the bleachers that is not happening. Thus, you will see the slow decline of their particular program.

New Ulm, Hutch and Willmar seem to avoid those defections the best why in the end they are the favorite older and talented kids who stayed home.

Sorry just dont see Luverne in contention they will be around a 6 seed or 7 seed and you never know but just dont see it.

Hutch has everything back and great group of bantams coming off a State Tourney Bid at the A Bantam level. Love the Cowger kid, Adams will be a beast and they will have plenty of support.

New UlmBring back around 17 letter winners 2 very solid goalies their top two dman. They have to find a way to avenge the Hutch loss but they will be loaded next year. Peterson, Davis, Kraus, Hoffman and so much more fire power they will be fun to watch.

Willmar bring back around 14 to 16 seniors next year. They have to replace their SuperStar Schnieder but still this team has tons of kids with experience and the Best Coach in the Section. Great coaching goes along way in this section look for Willmar to be the one team that can trip the Top Two off.

I told you why I like Marshall & Litch because Goaltending can cure holes in other places you may have holes. They are team that could pull some stunners in the Playoff Scene.

After that I just dont see much.
Luverne best of the rest have to prove they can win when it counts.... Still some bitterness over last year's collapse with the parents have heard...
Morris Benson Have to replaces a TON!! however, will not be an easy win for most teams in this section.
Windom Need someone to come in and continue to build what Ammerman had started... I gave one name I heard maybe others no more information on who comes in.
Worthington, Fairmont, Redwood will have low number and struggle but still need these communities to hopefully keep hockey as the sport needs to hopefully continue to grow in the area.

Should be an interesting year... I know Last summer everyone was writing off Marshall so you just never know....
WOW! Your even an idiot during the Summer months... I thought it might just be a Winter thing. Guess not.
Fast n crash: WOW! You just got me thinking about summer =D> That above comment is too funny along with alot of the above nonsense pertaining to the top team in the section.
Luverne appears to have a very good balance in Scoring, penalties, Goaltending and leadership. I have to retract what I said in a previous post about Sr. Leadership.
After reviewing stats on the top teams in Sec. 3A I really cannot see any team taking it to Luverne.
As of right now I declare Luverne the Section 3A Champion on paper and in Chatter on the 3A Hockey Forum. Now they just have to do it for real.
Best of Luck to the Cards!
Thanks for the entertainment all of you 3A posters! You all make it a worthwhile read. 8)
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

yesTONIGHT wrote:
notTONIGHT wrote:
gopherfan7 wrote: you're**

There's that great Luverne education at its finest! :lol:
Grammar police. How eloquent.

I now know everything I need to know about you.
Went to the thesaurus eh Herbie
Yup, man of great resources...
Section 3A HockeyScout
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:07 am

Post by Section 3A HockeyScout »

LDC pounded by St Peter 6 to 1 tonight.... Dragons look lost :shock:
Section 3A HockeyScout
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:07 am

Post by Section 3A HockeyScout »

Windom tops Waseca 3-2
Scout14
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 2:22 pm

Post by Scout14 »

Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:
notTONIGHT wrote:
hawkenjonny wrote:I really just wanted thoughts from anyone who knows the team better than I do. Didn't need the sarcastic list of what won't happen. Thought some discussion on styles of play and how they match up in 3A was relevant. Obviously it isn't about just 'talent' whatever that means. That's the shoulda, woulda, coulda defense. If Willmar had a game plan to shut down a scorer and it worked wouldn't that be something other teams are noticing as well? Sorry to have offended you with my attempt at valid discussion. For what it's worth, asking a question does not imply that Luverne won't win. The better prepared team often comes out of the section. If they, with their offensive power and tough D core/goalie are ready, they should win. Why so quick to get snarky? Unrealized dreams of your own?
It really didnt work for Willmar. There were chances given up because of their obsession with stopping the forward. This caused them to leave other players open. The balance of the top two lines is what helps Luverne. Cant really eliminate one player, or even a line and expect success. In fact, when Luverne plays willmar, as a Luverne fan, I would hope they go all out to stop him again.
No need to worry about playing Willmar again. I would hope that the Cards are focused on Hutch.

Not parent just have gotten to watch all the teams this year. Hutch has great depth and can play a physical game. Now that Allen the Senior is locked in the nets. Tigers are going to be very hard to beat for any 3A Program.

Luverne beat Willmar and Hutch but both played their BACK-UP Goalies... Just curious how no one else seems to think that is a big deal when thinking about matchup a week from now.
3A hockey trout take some advice...

Let the coaches for Luverne coach, let the players play, and maybe you should quite trying to pretend that you are someone from hutch!!

Maybe you and Obama can watch the cards in a suite at the X?

Roll cards roll!
Scout14
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 2:22 pm

Post by Scout14 »

Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:LDC pounded by St Peter 6 to 1 tonight.... Dragons look lost :shock:
Section 3A TroutScout are the dragons looking as lost as you are at 4:04 am??? :shock:
yesTONIGHT
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:04 pm

Post by yesTONIGHT »

This topic should be renamed to the Luverne forum.
Thegoldenjet
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:03 pm

Post by Thegoldenjet »

Name is fine, should get a reality TV contract, its a perfect bubble of self consciousness and insecurity that even those of us who claim (and wish) to be above it, can't help our darn selves from taking entertainment from the pettiness, great distraction from real life. Which I suppose, what is investing emotion in the pitting of adolescents in sport against each other if not, good, healthy, distraction?
sterfry9
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:32 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by sterfry9 »

Thegoldenjet wrote:Name is fine, should get a reality TV contract, its a perfect bubble of self consciousness and insecurity that even those of us who claim (and wish) to be above it, can't help our darn selves from taking entertainment from the pettiness, great distraction from real life. Which I suppose, what is investing emotion in the pitting of adolescents in sport against each other if not, good, healthy, distraction?
if it werent for 3ascouts trolling this would just be a bunch of luverne die hards sitting around talking about how great they are and that they cant help there location in the state etc...
Section 3A HockeyScout
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:07 am

Post by Section 3A HockeyScout »

sterfry9 wrote:
Thegoldenjet wrote:Name is fine, should get a reality TV contract, its a perfect bubble of self consciousness and insecurity that even those of us who claim (and wish) to be above it, can't help our darn selves from taking entertainment from the pettiness, great distraction from real life. Which I suppose, what is investing emotion in the pitting of adolescents in sport against each other if not, good, healthy, distraction?
if it werent for 3ascouts trolling this would just be a bunch of luverne die hards sitting around talking about how great they are and that they cant help there location in the state etc...
Its just nice to see that everyone else figured out this is basically a bunch of Luverne Posters on here.

No worries next Saturday around 7:30 this message board will become dead silent just like it was when they CHOKED last year.

Hutch, Willmar and New Ulm all playing well as of now Good Luck to their fans and team who understand what it means let your play on the ice do the talking
Section 3A HockeyScout
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:07 am

Post by Section 3A HockeyScout »

New Ulm 9 Farimont 1

NEW ULM - The New Ulm boy's hockey team geared up for the Section 3A hockey tournament by ending the regular season with a 9-1 win against Fairmont on Thursday night at the New Ulm Civic Center.

It was also - for trivia buffs - the final ever South Central Conference boy's hockey game with the formation of the Big South Conference next season.

Judd Davis collected a hat trick to up his season goals to 19 for New Ulm. Kelton Schmitz and Wyatt Peterson each added two goals. Brandon Helget scored his 21st goal while Dylan Klein added a score. Helget also added two assists.

New Ulm goalie Brach Kraus stopped 11-of-12 Fairmont shots.

The Eagles outshot Fairmont 40-12 and dominated the game.

"And this was a game that we should have dominated," said New Ulm coach Erik Setterholm, who saw his team improve to 15-10. "We were on our home ice, we wanted to get after it right away and put them behind the eight ball and we did that in the first period."

New Ulm did that with four goals in the first 17 minutes. Davis' backhander beat Cardinals goalie Colton Cunning before Kelton Schmitz added back-to-back goals less than a minute apart for a 3-0 lead.

Peterson's short-handed score lifted New Ulm to a four-goal lead after the first period

Helget, Klein and Davis added second-period goals for a 7-0 lead after two periods.

"We kind of played slow in the first five minutes of the game but then we came around," Setterholm said. "We played a real good second period - their goaltender made some good saves.

"We got three goals from Judd and Kelton got two. Kelton is the third or fourth line type guy and he got two goals."

Davis got his hat trick in the third period before Peterson got his second for a 9-0 New Ulm lead.

Farmont's lone score came when Fairmont's Trason Arens beat Kraus and then celebrated the lone goal by doing a belly flop on the ice.

'This is kind of a hard game to judge how we played," Setterholm said. "Our first playoff game on Thursday is going to be different game than this. Mistakes that we make then will come back and hurt us. It is what it is - a good win for us."

Setterholm was not happy with the chippyness of the game in the final period.

"I guess they decided that it was 9-1 so they decided to hit us," Setterholm said. "I hope that is not what we have to look forward to in the Big South Conference."


New Ulm wlll find out its seed in the Section 3A tournament on Saturday.


Nice Jab one last time the new conference in his paper. WOW :shock:

- Also looks like New Ulm was playing like Luverne Davis and Peterson are top line guys scoring the 8th and 9th goal in the THIRD PERIOD of game already well in the books. Where is "Respect the Game Police" Jonny???
hawkenjonny
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:36 pm

Post by hawkenjonny »

3A - Not the police, just like a better show of sportsmanship. If that is the way they play down there and feel good about it OK by me. Wouldn't be allowed here or when I played. Maybe I am just old school. All those high flying stats from 8+ goal victories in regular season games don't impress anyone but themselves. Maybe that is just how it is now, whatever I guess. Hope if the table turns their opponent shows more class. Also, save the 'everyone needs a trophy' speech if anyone was warming that one up :) Not the point at all. Looking forward to some good games (and 'discussion') out of 3A next week!
Scout14
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 2:22 pm

Post by Scout14 »

Section 3A HockeyScout wrote:
sterfry9 wrote:
Thegoldenjet wrote:Name is fine, should get a reality TV contract, its a perfect bubble of self consciousness and insecurity that even those of us who claim (and wish) to be above it, can't help our darn selves from taking entertainment from the pettiness, great distraction from real life. Which I suppose, what is investing emotion in the pitting of adolescents in sport against each other if not, good, healthy, distraction?
if it werent for 3ascouts trolling this would just be a bunch of luverne die hards sitting around talking about how great they are and that they cant help there location in the state etc...
Its just nice to see that everyone else figured out this is basically a bunch of Luverne Posters on here.

No worries next Saturday around 7:30 this message board will become dead silent just like it was when they CHOKED last year.

Hutch, Willmar and New Ulm all playing well as of now Good Luck to their fans and team who understand what it means let your play on the ice do the talking
The cards have let their play on the ice take care of all your bs all year long on this forum "trout"!!

If they lose next Saturday it will be on the coaches not having a team prepared to play again!!!

FYI weren't these the guys you wanted coaching this team??

P.S. (Trap game again tonight???)
the thrill
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 2:44 pm

Post by the thrill »

I have heard from several people that tell me Providence Academy is better than their record indicates, and could be a tough match up. A common opponent, Minnehaha Academy, resulted in a 3-1 W for PA and a 5-3 W for Luverne. Could be interesting.

I am predicting a 4-1 victory for Luverne.

Can't wait for a week from tomorrow and watching Luverne go at it again with Hutch (if Hutch gets by). IF the Cards win, 3A Scout won't hear the end of it! And rightly so. That guys is starting to really come across as a tool!
InYourFace09
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by InYourFace09 »

the thrill wrote:I have heard from several people that tell me Providence Academy is better than their record indicates, and could be a tough match up. A common opponent, Minnehaha Academy, resulted in a 3-1 W for PA and a 5-3 W for Luverne. Could be interesting.

I am predicting a 4-1 victory for Luverne.

Can't wait for a week from tomorrow and watching Luverne go at it again with Hutch (if Hutch gets by). IF the Cards win, 3A Scout won't hear the end of it! And rightly so. That guys is starting to really come across as a tool!
And if Hutch wins, well Luverne will have to hear the same old story again!!

Bet you can't wait for that to happen!! Also anyone makes it out of sections besides Luvernce, it will continue to be the choke show right?
the thrill
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 2:44 pm

Post by the thrill »

InYourFace09 wrote:
the thrill wrote:I have heard from several people that tell me Providence Academy is better than their record indicates, and could be a tough match up. A common opponent, Minnehaha Academy, resulted in a 3-1 W for PA and a 5-3 W for Luverne. Could be interesting.

I am predicting a 4-1 victory for Luverne.

Can't wait for a week from tomorrow and watching Luverne go at it again with Hutch (if Hutch gets by). IF the Cards win, 3A Scout won't hear the end of it! And rightly so. That guys is starting to really come across as a tool!
And if Hutch wins, well Luverne will have to hear the same old story again!!

Bet you can't wait for that to happen!! Also anyone makes it out of sections besides Luvernce, it will continue to be the choke show right?
Fair enough. I get it. But I'm still picking Luverne to win the section. And if they do, I am sure all of the haters on here will eat their crow, right? :roll:
InYourFace09
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by InYourFace09 »

the thrill wrote:
InYourFace09 wrote:
the thrill wrote:I have heard from several people that tell me Providence Academy is better than their record indicates, and could be a tough match up. A common opponent, Minnehaha Academy, resulted in a 3-1 W for PA and a 5-3 W for Luverne. Could be interesting.

I am predicting a 4-1 victory for Luverne.

Can't wait for a week from tomorrow and watching Luverne go at it again with Hutch (if Hutch gets by). IF the Cards win, 3A Scout won't hear the end of it! And rightly so. That guys is starting to really come across as a tool!
And if Hutch wins, well Luverne will have to hear the same old story again!!

Bet you can't wait for that to happen!! Also anyone makes it out of sections besides Luvernce, it will continue to be the choke show right?
Fair enough. I get it. But I'm still picking Luverne to win the section. And if they do, I am sure all of the haters on here will eat their crow, right? :roll:
The haters yes. I was just pointing out the other side, in which most on here don't like to see.
Scout14
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 2:22 pm

Post by Scout14 »

InYourFace09 wrote:
the thrill wrote:
InYourFace09 wrote: And if Hutch wins, well Luverne will have to hear the same old story again!!

Bet you can't wait for that to happen!! Also anyone makes it out of sections besides Luvernce, it will continue to be the choke show right?
Fair enough. I get it. But I'm still picking Luverne to win the section. And if they do, I am sure all of the haters on here will eat their crow, right? :roll:
The haters yes. I was just pointing out the other side, in which most on here don't like to see.
FYI Luverne have the horses this year not ponies...
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

Hey trout, is Luverne going to be playing the backups for providence like you said that they did for all the other big games? Any idea?
Post Reply