4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Could be better than it appears on paper.
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
I can accept that. Although, history has shown they haven't lost too many times in sections and rarely outside of the finals.MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
This is not a great HM team and those close to the program realize this. But this is a good team in a year without any dominant teams. I will be surprised if HM struggles with Roseville. I see them rolling all 3 lines and winning by 4. Nothing fancy, just advancing.
-
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:42 am
- Location: RIGHT BEHIND YOU!!!!
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Which players and/or coaches do you know personally? Curious to hear who goes in with big heads?MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
The City of Hill Murray is beautiful this time of year
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Good news is the last two state titles for HM were good, not great teams. I'm not expecting it this year, but wouldn't be surprised either. I don't think they'll have any trouble with Roseville either. Friday is coming and I don't think any natural event could stop a WBL v HM section final to close the coliseum. Too much karma on hand for that to happen.Pioneerprideguy wrote:I can accept that. Although, history has shown they haven't lost too many times in sections and rarely outside of the finals.MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote: Because?
This is not a great HM team and those close to the program realize this. But this is a good team in a year without any dominant teams. I will be surprised if HM struggles with Roseville. I see them rolling all 3 lines and winning by 4. Nothing fancy, just advancing.
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
If they go in as cocky as some of the Hill fans on here.BlueLineSpecial wrote:Which players and/or coaches do you know personally? Curious to hear who goes in with big heads?MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote: Because?

-
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:42 am
- Location: RIGHT BEHIND YOU!!!!
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I amMrBoDangles wrote:If they go in as cocky as some of the Hill fans on here.BlueLineSpecial wrote:Which players and/or coaches do you know personally? Curious to hear who goes in with big heads?MrBoDangles wrote: Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.
-Muhammad Ali

The City of Hill Murray is beautiful this time of year
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Cassius did not attend Hill.BlueLineSpecial wrote:
It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am
-Muhammad Ali
Nor any private school.
-
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:42 am
- Location: RIGHT BEHIND YOU!!!!
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Oh he didn't attend Hill? Gee then I guess my post was irrelevant, trolling, and stupid. Well one of our posts was anywayelliott70 wrote:Cassius did not attend Hill.BlueLineSpecial wrote:
It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am
-Muhammad Ali
Nor any private school.
The City of Hill Murray is beautiful this time of year
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:41 pm
I like HM by a couple but the Roseville G has had an excellent year and in one game type of playoffs goaltending is as big a factor in the outcome as anything...HM goalie has been very good too...hope for a competitive game! Interesting Anderson will be going against Roseville, his youth association and where his pop used to help coach the HS team a while back....
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Just added manic with the cocky....BlueLineSpecial wrote:Oh he didn't attend Hill? Gee then I guess my post was irrelevant, trolling, and stupid. Well one of our posts was anywayelliott70 wrote:Cassius did not attend Hill.BlueLineSpecial wrote:
It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am
-Muhammad Ali
Nor any private school.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:40 am
-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:17 pm
I believe 3rd graders who start playing in a community youth association hockey program should sign a contract that legally binds them to attend the local public high school. As the years go by they can only be released from that contract if they're not very good. (Of course this rule would have stopped TJ Oshie from going to Warroad.)inthetwine wrote:It's a good bet none of them are from the Hill youth program!badgermom78 wrote:What associations are the Hill players from?
Last edited by stpaul on Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
They always look great to most of us that aren't "close"..... It's why we give ya a extra dose of ribbing.Pioneerprideguy wrote:I can accept that. Although, history has shown they haven't lost too many times in sections and rarely outside of the finals.MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote: Because?
This is not a great HM team and those close to the program realize this. But this is a good team in a year without any dominant teams. I will be surprised if HM struggles with Roseville. I see them rolling all 3 lines and winning by 4. Nothing fancy, just advancing.

-
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:59 pm
Re: 4AA SEMIFINALS #4 ROSEVILLE VS #1 HILL-MURRAY
Like every other team having a good season and lose in an upset?MrBoDangles wrote:Because Hill Murray folks go in with big heads and sometimes lose to teams that they shouldn't.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Because?wbmd wrote:Could be better than it appears on paper.
Like every other team not having a good season who blame it on puck bounces and private schools and anything other than their team isn't as good this year?
Confidence does not equal cocky, especially among parents! We know how quickly it can go the other way.
-
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:59 pm
Is this a serious suggestion or am I just sluggish from the girls tourney...stpaul wrote:I believe 3rd graders who start playing in a community youth association hockey program should sign a contract that legally binds them to attend the local public high school. As the years go by they can only be released from that contract if they're not very good. (Of course this rule would have stopped TJ Oshie from going to Warroad.)inthetwine wrote:It's a good bet none of them are from the Hill youth program!badgermom78 wrote:What associations are the Hill players from?
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
You're extremely-sluggish in comprehending all the posts above.....Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:Is this a serious suggestion or am I just sluggish from the girls tourney...stpaul wrote:I believe 3rd graders who start playing in a community youth association hockey program should sign a contract that legally binds them to attend the local public high school. As the years go by they can only be released from that contract if they're not very good. (Of course this rule would have stopped TJ Oshie from going to Warroad.)inthetwine wrote: It's a good bet none of them are from the Hill youth program!

-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:41 pm
I'm gonna get skewered here but I know quite a few of the HM players from recent years, I've found them to be great kids from great families. Having a relative just finish playing HS last weekend at a public school with a 'two hour a day coach' who taught him nothing in three years and had no goals or standards for the program, I can't argue with kids who want better.
HM
Thank you. This is the truth. Bill Lechner (boys hockey & baseball), Bill Schafhauser (girls hockey), Erin Herman (girls basketball) and Dick Ghizone (boys basketball) and most of the coaches at Hill-Murray are there and in the school building full-time. This also goes for band & theatre kids and their directors. The school is small enough (800 or so in 6 grades) that they know everbody. They interact with the kids during the day and all year. They are great role models. Kids know they better be at school, behaving and doing well in class to play. I don't think you have to get skewered for saying this out loud but agree you probably will.mnhockfan99 wrote:I'm gonna get skewered here but I know quite a few of the HM players from recent years, I've found them to be great kids from great families. Having a relative just finish playing HS last weekend at a public school with a 'two hour a day coach' who taught him nothing in three years and had no goals or standards for the program, I can't argue with kids who want better.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:21 pm
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:53 am