Yeah, it was sloppy play by both teams for a lot of the game, but egf's goalie definitely was the only thing that kept them in it.Deathblow wrote:Yep...I thought Warroad took it to them...those 4 dmen were clearing everything and everybody from in front of the net. The Green Wave really wasn't able to develop much offensively. Warroad forced them into a lot of turnovers, and was really able to generate a lot of quality shots on Weber, but he was able to bail them out. Unfortunate that somebody had to lose this game, but the depth of EGF was really the deciding factor...otherwise the Wave was lucky to come up with the win.
EGF vs Warroad Section 8A Championship
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:18 am
-
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:40 am
-
- Posts: 2679
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:01 pm
Very good game to attend. Warroad running two lines against EGF three lines caught up to the Warriors. Impressed with Warroad one line skill and two lines very efficient D strategy throughout the game. Both teams deserved the trip to Saint Paul unfortunately only one can go and that took double overtime to decide.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:12 pm
Bwaa haaa haaa
I don't know why this is such a befuddling thing to people. I grew up across the river on the ND side and always understood what a green wave is. One is overpowered by the wave of green clad opponents. Like a Tulane Green Wave (clearly what EGF copied) or a Crimson Tide or Cleveland Brown. Same idea.SPUDNUT wrote:What the heck is a "Green Wave", anyway ? Something like a "Heat" or a "Wild" ? Must be something that comes from the yucky water in the Red River. Oh well, go EGF - good luck next week. Will be glued in front of the TV.
Frankly I think it's better than being a Spud or a Gopher. Neither one of those sounds like it could overpower an opponent.

-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:51 pm
The gameplan for Warroad included a lot of chipping/chasing out of their D-Zone to spring guys going up ice, but there was a lot of skill for both teams out on the ice last night. Some examples include many scoring chances for Warroads top line, and the Bowen line for EGF (the second goal in particular). I wouldn't call the game "sloppy" at all, pretty good pace and fun to watch.puckbreath wrote:Yeah, it was sloppy play by both teams for a lot of the game, but egf's goalie definitely was the only thing that kept them in it.Deathblow wrote:Yep...I thought Warroad took it to them...those 4 dmen were clearing everything and everybody from in front of the net. The Green Wave really wasn't able to develop much offensively. Warroad forced them into a lot of turnovers, and was really able to generate a lot of quality shots on Weber, but he was able to bail them out. Unfortunate that somebody had to lose this game, but the depth of EGF was really the deciding factor...otherwise the Wave was lucky to come up with the win.
-
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
- Location: State of Hockey
Mostly, I agree with your summary, but, EGF did look tentative a lot of the time.mn miracle man wrote:The gameplan for Warroad included a lot of chipping/chasing out of their D-Zone to spring guys going up ice, but there was a lot of skill for both teams out on the ice last night. Some examples include many scoring chances for Warroads top line, and the Bowen line for EGF (the second goal in particular). I wouldn't call the game "sloppy" at all, pretty good pace and fun to watch.puckbreath wrote:Yeah, it was sloppy play by both teams for a lot of the game, but egf's goalie definitely was the only thing that kept them in it.Deathblow wrote:Yep...I thought Warroad took it to them...those 4 dmen were clearing everything and everybody from in front of the net. The Green Wave really wasn't able to develop much offensively. Warroad forced them into a lot of turnovers, and was really able to generate a lot of quality shots on Weber, but he was able to bail them out. Unfortunate that somebody had to lose this game, but the depth of EGF was really the deciding factor...otherwise the Wave was lucky to come up with the win.
Some of the players seemed to be holding back instead of going agressively to the puck.
The EGF coach even stated so after the game that they were kind of tight and playing more not to lose than to win.
I agree that it would be great if they were both going to state.
But, not to be.
What is a Green Wave anyway?
-
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm
Lots of turnovers, lots of errant/missed their mark passes, no flow because of them = sloppy play for me.mn miracle man wrote:The gameplan for Warroad included a lot of chipping/chasing out of their D-Zone to spring guys going up ice, but there was a lot of skill for both teams out on the ice last night. Some examples include many scoring chances for Warroads top line, and the Bowen line for EGF (the second goal in particular). I wouldn't call the game "sloppy" at all, pretty good pace and fun to watch.puckbreath wrote:Yeah, it was sloppy play by both teams for a lot of the game, but egf's goalie definitely was the only thing that kept them in it.Deathblow wrote:Yep...I thought Warroad took it to them...those 4 dmen were clearing everything and everybody from in front of the net. The Green Wave really wasn't able to develop much offensively. Warroad forced them into a lot of turnovers, and was really able to generate a lot of quality shots on Weber, but he was able to bail them out. Unfortunate that somebody had to lose this game, but the depth of EGF was really the deciding factor...otherwise the Wave was lucky to come up with the win.
At least in regulation there was.
ymmv
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:33 pm
How do you figure? 3rd and the ots warroad started to take over.northwoods oldtimer wrote:Very good game to attend. Warroad running two lines against EGF three lines caught up to the Warriors. Impressed with Warroad one line skill and two lines very efficient D strategy throughout the game. Both teams deserved the trip to Saint Paul unfortunately only one can go and that took double overtime to decide.
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:33 pm
How do you figure? 3rd and the ots warroad started to take over.northwoods oldtimer wrote:Very good game to attend. Warroad running two lines against EGF three lines caught up to the Warriors. Impressed with Warroad one line skill and two lines very efficient D strategy throughout the game. Both teams deserved the trip to Saint Paul unfortunately only one can go and that took double overtime to decide.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:38 am
Agreed.. Warroad looked better every period that game went. Had more scoring chances in the 3rd and both overtimes than EGF they just could not capitalize.25 sheet power wrote:How do you figure? 3rd and the ots warroad started to take over.northwoods oldtimer wrote:Very good game to attend. Warroad running two lines against EGF three lines caught up to the Warriors. Impressed with Warroad one line skill and two lines very efficient D strategy throughout the game. Both teams deserved the trip to Saint Paul unfortunately only one can go and that took double overtime to decide.