#2Hermantown (22-4-2) vs Luverne (27-0-1) 11am

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

who ya got?

Hermantown
71
71%
Luverne
29
29%
 
Total votes: 100

ScoutReports
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:11 am

Re: #2Hermantown (22-4-2) vs Luverne (27-0-1) 11am

Post by ScoutReports »

bardown27 wrote:
ScoutReports wrote:Of Course Jaxson Nelson is good!
check it out, #1 prospect.
http://overtheboards.net/top-performers-mid-dec13/
he's not the #1 prospect, he's the #1 top performer...

ahh shoot! i used the wrong word! thanks for the correction! haha XD
ER17
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:31 am

Post by ER17 »

What a scramble in front of the Hermantown net!
jeffpv
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:08 pm

Post by jeffpv »

Good, competitive game. Luverne should be proud of their effort after a tough draw. They have an excellent chance of winning their consolation round game if they play this well.
Meyer, Nelson, and Smeserud gave a fabulous showing. Meyer specifically kept them in the game.
Doc Holliday
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: SW Suburbs

Post by Doc Holliday »

Final, Hermantown 6-3 (empty net goal)

Luverne completely belonged on this stage...
east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7428
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Post by east hockey »

Hats off to the Cardinals. They represented very well.

Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
StanleyYelnats
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:43 am

Post by StanleyYelnats »

ER17 wrote:What a scramble in front of the Hermantown net!

Final 6-3 in favor of hawks..

Good thing brown pulled the goalie to let in that last one. Good performance from the Cards.
Nuts&Bolts
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:12 pm

Post by Nuts&Bolts »

Final 6-3 (EN). Closer game than expected. Luverne is a decent team but poor in the defensive zone. Really liked the Luverne goalie and the 8th grader can play. Hermantown was not very impressive IMO. Well down from last year but it was the early game according to Bruce. Pionk a very nice player like his older brother that bailed on his senior year for the USHL.
BlueLineSpecial
Posts: 1228
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:42 am
Location: RIGHT BEHIND YOU!!!!

Post by BlueLineSpecial »

Luverne just didn't get the breaks. Future looks bright
The City of Hill Murray is beautiful this time of year
EHSHack
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:09 pm

Post by EHSHack »

Luverne was a much superior team when it came to stick handling, but they were noticeably shaky on their skates at times and Hermantown was overall better. H-Town did not look impressive though.
Go Hounds.
Deck Slide
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:41 pm

Re: #2Hermantown (22-4-2) vs Luverne (27-0-1) 11am

Post by Deck Slide »

ScoutReports wrote:
bardown27 wrote:
ScoutReports wrote:Of Course Jaxson Nelson is good!
check it out, #1 prospect.
http://overtheboards.net/top-performers-mid-dec13/
he's not the #1 prospect, he's the #1 top performer...

ahh shoot! i used the wrong word! thanks for the correction! haha XD
Has Nelson hit his peak or does he continue to get better??? Time will tell! This kid is 4 yr. from being draft eligible. He was certainly known to scouts before the tournament but I think he only improved his value after this game. I see him in a SSM uniform next year!
TTpuckster
Posts: 2783
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
Location: State of Hockey

Post by TTpuckster »

EHSHack wrote:Luverne was a much superior team when it came to stick handling, but they were noticeably shaky on their skates at times and Hermantown was overall better. H-Town did not look impressive though.
don't know if I agree with that.

Hermantown had some very good stickhandling going on.
And they did look impressive.
The difference is that Luverne looked impressive.
What is a Green Wave anyway?
WestMetro
Posts: 3872
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:08 pm

Post by WestMetro »

Agree with N & B that Luverne coach needs to emphasize protection in their defensive zone, probably didn't see that kind of pressure anywhere earlier in the year.

Anyway, Luverne had an amazing run, represented their Section well, and with a few different rolls of the puck might have repeated Hermantowns undefeated championship run from 7? years ago.

Hermantown will have to do better to defeat EGF, who I promise will protect against any open spaces in their D zone.
flash4000
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:17 pm

Post by flash4000 »

Luverne looked better than these teams starting the second game. Too bad they didn't get seeded. Looks like they should have!
karl(east)
Posts: 6480
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
Contact:

Post by karl(east) »

WestMetro wrote:Agree with N & B that Luverne coach needs to emphasize protection in their defensive zone, probably didn't see that kind of pressure anywhere earlier in the year.

Anyway, Luverne had an amazing run, represented their Section well, and with a few different rolls of the puck might have repeated Hermantowns undefeated championship run from 7? years ago.

Hermantown will have to do better to defeat EGF, who I promise will protect against any open spaces in their D zone.
You could see that, in the first few minutes, they were just blindly throwing the puck to areas, not making clean passes...that probably works against most of the teams they play, but not Hermantown. To their credit, they cleaned that up as the game went along.
Mite-dad
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:16 am

Post by Mite-dad »

Reminds of the Little Falls teams that came in somewhat untested. Similar result too.
flash4000
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: #2Hermantown (22-4-2) vs Luverne (27-0-1) 11am

Post by flash4000 »

Deck Slide wrote:
ScoutReports wrote:
bardown27 wrote: he's not the #1 prospect, he's the #1 top performer...

ahh shoot! i used the wrong word! thanks for the correction! haha XD
Has Nelson hit his peak or does he continue to get better??? Time will tell! This kid is 4 yr. from being draft eligible. He was certainly known to scouts before the tournament but I think he only improved his value after this game. I see him in a SSM uniform next year!
What hockey player peaks as an 8th grader? That may be the dumbest question ever brought up on this board!
Froggy Richards
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:15 am

Re: #2Hermantown (22-4-2) vs Luverne (27-0-1) 11am

Post by Froggy Richards »

Deck Slide wrote:
ScoutReports wrote:
bardown27 wrote: he's not the #1 prospect, he's the #1 top performer...

ahh shoot! i used the wrong word! thanks for the correction! haha XD
Has Nelson hit his peak or does he continue to get better??? Time will tell! This kid is 4 yr. from being draft eligible. He was certainly known to scouts before the tournament but I think he only improved his value after this game. I see him in a SSM uniform next year!
He also hasn't started 9th grade yet, so he has the option of going anywhere under any circumstances and be eligible right away. Hmmm, wonder if anyone in Hermantown has offered to Billet him yet. :lol:

All kidding aside, all this talk about how long will he stick around Luverne is a little crazy. The kid is an 8th Grader from a small town. He may have no intention of going anywhere for awhile.
flash4000
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:17 pm

Post by flash4000 »

Looks like hermantown will get that running clock in the second game that they thought they would have in the first.
HShockeywatcher
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm

Re: #2Hermantown (22-4-2) vs Luverne (27-0-1) 11am

Post by HShockeywatcher »

Froggy Richards wrote:He also hasn't started 9th grade yet, so he has the option of going anywhere under any circumstances and be eligible right away. Hmmm, wonder if anyone in Hermantown has offered to Billet him yet. :lol:

All kidding aside, all this talk about how long will he stick around Luverne is a little crazy. The kid is an 8th Grader from a small town. He may have no intention of going anywhere for awhile.
5 of their top 7 scorers are not graduating and I think, off hand, maybe 1 or 2 are juniors. Goalie's not a senior. As well as they played, it'll be very interesting to see how they do next year...and the rest of this year for that matter. I wouldn't be surprised to see them pick up two more wins. They got a rough draw.
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Post by MrBoDangles »

BlueLineSpecial wrote:Luverne just didn't get the breaks. Future looks bright
The two major flubs in front of their net hurt.
RRubberbeeskit
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:23 am

Post by RRubberbeeskit »

flash4000 wrote:Luverne looked better than these teams starting the second game. Too bad they didn't get seeded. Looks like they should have!
:-({|= :-({|= :-({|=
defense
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: right here

Re: #2Hermantown (22-4-2) vs Luverne (27-0-1) 11am

Post by defense »

flash4000 wrote:
Deck Slide wrote:
ScoutReports wrote:
ahh shoot! i used the wrong word! thanks for the correction! haha XD
Has Nelson hit his peak or does he continue to get better??? Time will tell! This kid is 4 yr. from being draft eligible. He was certainly known to scouts before the tournament but I think he only improved his value after this game. I see him in a SSM uniform next year!
What hockey player peaks as an 8th grader? That may be the dumbest question ever brought up on this board!
not really bud. hockey players peak at any age. some never come out of it, some bounce back, some don't peak till later some never do peak.
4chex
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:31 am

Post by 4chex »

Hats off to a very gritty Luverne team. The future looks bright for these kids. They battled hard to the final horn. Ultimately Hermantown's depth was too much. Very impressive squad. There's still hardware to be won. Go get it!
defense
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: right here

Post by defense »

RRubberbeeskit wrote:
flash4000 wrote:Luverne looked better than these teams starting the second game. Too bad they didn't get seeded. Looks like they should have!
:-({|= :-({|= :-({|=
You won't get seeded when you only play against teams that 90 % of the rest of the league would smoke as well. Good enough to be serious in St. Paul in March? YES. But did nothing to deserve a seed. They did get a tough draw right away, I wonder what if this tourney was still on the section rotation for first round match ups, what could Luverne do in a semi final after getting a game under their belts?
Winter is Coming
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:42 pm

Re: #2Hermantown (22-4-2) vs Luverne (27-0-1) 11am

Post by Winter is Coming »

flash4000 wrote:
Deck Slide wrote:
ScoutReports wrote:
ahh shoot! i used the wrong word! thanks for the correction! haha XD
Has Nelson hit his peak or does he continue to get better??? Time will tell! This kid is 4 yr. from being draft eligible. He was certainly known to scouts before the tournament but I think he only improved his value after this game. I see him in a SSM uniform next year!
What hockey player peaks as an 8th grader? That may be the dumbest question ever brought up on this board!
Seen a bunch of them over time. That speedy little forward who ducks and dogdes his way through traffic who hits puberty and comes un done because he can't catch up to his body size and get "ungangly". That kid who is big as an 8th grader and uses his body and post puberty skill set to wow and amaze until the rest of the kids get through puberty and then he is middle of the pack. That goalie who is a slip sliding butterflying machine when he is playing Bantams against kids who are not snipers yet but who does not get much taller and who becomes the victim of snipers and lack of skills/body size. Who does not play the game style that his body size and skill set dictates that he should.

I am not saying that this is going to happen to this kid but it could. Not the end of the world but the end of the road for a kid who rests on his Bantam reputation and quits working hard because he has "it made" and gets caught up to and over taken by those kids who are working constantly to get better.
Post Reply