Fair enough ... I lumped all of the main suspects (read: conversation starters) in there. It's quite possible I was in a mood as well. The "hired-gun" mentality is what I was going after. I'm glad your PR department was able to correct this errant blog posting.terrymoore1717 wrote:Dr. G-you probalby forgot about this post. It ws a couple weeks back but just was called to my attention. I want to make sure no one inadvertantly identifies the Blades with the for-profits that are now coming to the scene.DrGaf wrote:
For profit hockey will destroy what we have. The only reason Minnesota is what it is, is because of the community model. My god, I do not want to live in a world of Acheiver Academy Bauer-Emerson McBain Moore short STicked PUck heads.
My own opinon is that the two-year community model combined with the birth-year off season teams is MN's secret sauce. For example, over the 24 months he is a Peewee, little Johnny will compete as a younger player (first year) as a mid-aged player (AAA) and as an older player (second year). This creates three different situations and really helps development.
As to your secret-sauce, I agree whole-heartedly. The same kid is forced to (allowed to) grow in different roles if he so desires. My youngest is a July birthday. Personally, I believe he gets the best of it.