Section 3A 2014 - 2015
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 8:22 pm
I know it is early, but it looks like Luverne and Hutchinson will be the teams to beat this year, with New Ulm in the mix as well. But some of these teams may run into trouble at the goaltending position down the stretch. I would love to see a Luverne/Hutchinson game this year. Too bad Hutchinson refuses to drive down to Luverne......
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm
My understanding was Hutch really wanted to play Luverne this year, and reluctantly let them off the schedule. This was necessary to Schedule HDM and Totino. After the Lopsided games last year between the two it was a no brainer. Looks like Hutch is for real this year. It would have undoubtedly been a better game (maybe).MrGoalieBoy wrote:I know it is early, but it looks like Luverne and Hutchinson will be the teams to beat this year, with New Ulm in the mix as well. But some of these teams may run into trouble at the goaltending position down the stretch. I would love to see a Luverne/Hutchinson game this year. Too bad Hutchinson refuses to drive down to Luverne......

Im interested to see how New Ulm handles Marshall tomorrow. Murphy's law (google it Bettman, its worth a google) was very evident for Luverne last night. As was expected in a rivalry game. Luverne Missing a top 3 Defenseman almost bit them hard last night. The JAZ line really bailed them out last night with 10 combined points.
-
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 pm
Or just one line.hawkenjonny wrote:If rolling 1-4 evenly for the last period or two of an obvious blowout is what is being down down in Cardville, then last year those lines must have been insanely uneven given the number of blowout games and goals scored by lines one and two compared to three. Obviously the top two lines are expected to score more, but the difference was unreal. Hopefully the teams that are in this situation will get some more balanced scoring because to be competitive with better teams, you need more than just two lines that can function. Hard to argue with those that claim it is just stats padding Herb because that is sure how it LOOKS. Didn't watch so don't claim to know, just looking at numbers. Glad to hear if running all lines equally when the situation warrants it.
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:36 pm



-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 8:22 pm
Oh, alright, thanks for that! Very interesting to see how Luverne does against an impressive St Paul Academy squad this weekend. Go Cards! Will you be in attendance notTONIGHT??notTONIGHT wrote:My understanding was Hutch really wanted to play Luverne this year, and reluctantly let them off the schedule. This was necessary to Schedule HDM and Totino. After the Lopsided games last year between the two it was a no brainer. Looks like Hutch is for real this year. It would have undoubtedly been a better game (maybe).MrGoalieBoy wrote:I know it is early, but it looks like Luverne and Hutchinson will be the teams to beat this year, with New Ulm in the mix as well. But some of these teams may run into trouble at the goaltending position down the stretch. I would love to see a Luverne/Hutchinson game this year. Too bad Hutchinson refuses to drive down to Luverne......![]()
Im interested to see how New Ulm handles Marshall tomorrow. Murphy's law (google it Bettman, its worth a google) was very evident for Luverne last night. As was expected in a rivalry game. Luverne Missing a top 3 Defenseman almost bit them hard last night. The JAZ line really bailed them out last night with 10 combined points.
Hey guys let's remember St. Paul Academy hasn't played anyone yet either this year! Will be tested on Thursday night...MrGoalieBoy wrote:Oh, alright, thanks for that! Very interesting to see how Luverne does against an impressive St Paul Academy squad this weekend. Go Cards! Will you be in attendance notTONIGHT??notTONIGHT wrote:My understanding was Hutch really wanted to play Luverne this year, and reluctantly let them off the schedule. This was necessary to Schedule HDM and Totino. After the Lopsided games last year between the two it was a no brainer. Looks like Hutch is for real this year. It would have undoubtedly been a better game (maybe).MrGoalieBoy wrote:I know it is early, but it looks like Luverne and Hutchinson will be the teams to beat this year, with New Ulm in the mix as well. But some of these teams may run into trouble at the goaltending position down the stretch. I would love to see a Luverne/Hutchinson game this year. Too bad Hutchinson refuses to drive down to Luverne......![]()
Im interested to see how New Ulm handles Marshall tomorrow. Murphy's law (google it Bettman, its worth a google) was very evident for Luverne last night. As was expected in a rivalry game. Luverne Missing a top 3 Defenseman almost bit them hard last night. The JAZ line really bailed them out last night with 10 combined points.
Mahtomedi on Thursday
Luverne on Saturday
Hope they can stay in the top 20 we will see!
-
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 pm
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 2:40 pm
Now if Luverne had this schedule, and they win these games, the Cardinal Nation would probably get some of the respect they think they deserve.InigoMontoya wrote:Just perusing the schedules of a couple section teams, I don't think anyone has a tougher stretch of games than LDC's second half of January.
#8 Orono
#12 Delano
#15AA Holy Family
#7 New Prague
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:51 am
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:55 pm
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:51 am
[quote="gingerroll"][quote="notTONIGHT"]In their defense, Luverne does have more nationally televised games than Litchfield does in the second half of January.[/quote]
So you are saying that while I'm in Vegas that weekend I'll be able to get the game or by nationally you mean just in MN.[/quote]
it's on FSN north for hockey day in Minnesota.
So you are saying that while I'm in Vegas that weekend I'll be able to get the game or by nationally you mean just in MN.[/quote]
it's on FSN north for hockey day in Minnesota.
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm
Fox sports 2 nationallylamplighter98 wrote:it's on FSN north for hockey day in Minnesota.gingerroll wrote:So you are saying that while I'm in Vegas that weekend I'll be able to get the game or by nationally you mean just in MN.notTONIGHT wrote:In their defense, Luverne does have more nationally televised games than Litchfield does in the second half of January.
Yes you can watch in Vegas or Boston or Atlanta
VEGAS BABY!!!notTONIGHT wrote:Fox sports 2 nationallylamplighter98 wrote:it's on FSN north for hockey day in Minnesota.gingerroll wrote: So you are saying that while I'm in Vegas that weekend I'll be able to get the game or by nationally you mean just in MN.
Yes you can watch in Vegas or Boston or Atlanta
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm
wooshlager wrote:Marshall 3
New Ulm 2
FINAL
THATTA BABY MARSHALL!!
What on earth happened to LORDS Squad? What were shots? All Marshall did against Luverne was Collapse 5 guys below the dots and hope for the best. Lord should of seen that coming last week with his coaching acumen (google that word bettman, its a good one)..
Only 5 total points for the big boys against Redwood? What happened? Wheels falling off? Haha, had to to rib ya a bit Anthony (NOTtonight).
And you better than worrying about New Ulm Cathedral/Sleepy Eye. Roll Cards Roll!
And you better than worrying about New Ulm Cathedral/Sleepy Eye. Roll Cards Roll!
Last edited by BP on Thu Dec 04, 2014 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:54 pm
rollCARDSroll wrote:You should of seen the Timeout and Goalie being pulled by Redwood at the end of the game down 7 rip. It was the cutest EVER!BP wrote:Only 5 total points for the big boys against Redwood? What happened? Wheels falling off? Haha, had to to rib ya a bit Anthony (NOTtonight).
Anthony, they were happy the first line didn't play 15 minutes of the 3rd period of a game in running time! They are trying to build too!
Last edited by BP on Thu Dec 04, 2014 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:03 pm
Final was 4-3 Marshall in overtime. 2-1 NU after the first, 2-2 after the second. Marshall went up 3-2 early in the third, NU answered quickly to make it 3-3. Back and forth the rest. Good game by both squads, action at both ends, both goalies saved the game more than once, both teams hit pipes, etc.