Section 3A 2014 - 2015

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Teak
Posts: 1877
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:27 am

Post by Teak »

pats12 wrote:Must have been exciting in Marshall tonight, Teak or BB, do you have specifics?
Down 3-1 after 2 periods, Marshall stormed back in the 3rd with 3 goals to win it. Derek Rasmussen scored 2 goals and assisted on the winning goal with around 1:30 left. Great stuff!

Nice to see Redwood Valley keep it close against Luverne. Hope the Cards get cocky so that Marshall knocks them off.
elliott70
Posts: 15766
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 »

Teak wrote:
pats12 wrote:Must have been exciting in Marshall tonight, Teak or BB, do you have specifics?
Down 3-1 after 2 periods, Marshall stormed back in the 3rd with 3 goals to win it. Derek Rasmussen scored 2 goals and assisted on the winning goal with around 1:30 left. Great stuff!

Nice to see Redwood Valley keep it close against Luverne. Hope the Cards get cocky so that Marshall knocks them off.
RollTigersRoll!
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

Teak wrote:
pats12 wrote:Must have been exciting in Marshall tonight, Teak or BB, do you have specifics?
Down 3-1 after 2 periods, Marshall stormed back in the 3rd with 3 goals to win it. Derek Rasmussen scored 2 goals and assisted on the winning goal with around 1:30 left. Great stuff!

Nice to see Redwood Valley keep it close against Luverne. Hope the Cards get cocky so that Marshall knocks them off.

The cards feel like they lost last night. Getting too cocky is not an option.

Not beating a rival 3 times in a season is an option.
MrGoalieBoy
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 8:22 pm

Post by MrGoalieBoy »

Yikes, that's a scary game for Luverne! For Luverne, they better hope Marshall doesn't have a hot tendy! Otherwise they could be in some trouble. My opinion is that Luverne will win 4-2. My prediction for Hutch and New Ulm is Hutch takes them down 5-4 in OT.
GopherPuck15
Posts: 286
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:47 am

Post by GopherPuck15 »

Is 3A back to irrelevancy all of a sudden? What happened to Luverne?
pats12
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:53 pm

Post by pats12 »

GopherPuck15 wrote:Is 3A back to irrelevancy all of a sudden? What happened to Luverne?
The same thing that happened to NP and MW, but to a lesser extent.
RRubberbeeskit
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:23 am

Post by RRubberbeeskit »

GopherPuck15 wrote:Is 3A back to irrelevancy all of a sudden? What happened to Luverne?
They would have to be relevant first and I believe Luverne broke a nail.💅
pats12
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:53 pm

Post by pats12 »

Delay of game, 2 min penalty - A player or goaltender intentionally knocks the net's goalpost off its moorings, which stops the play.

What if it happens 15 times in one game by a goalie?
Whiner33
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am

Post by Whiner33 »

pats12 wrote:Delay of game, 2 min penalty - A player or goaltender intentionally knocks the net's goalpost off its moorings, which stops the play.

What if it happens 15 times in one game by a goalie?
Ask JOE!! Never knew he had such a great vertical!
Bettman's Bender
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:18 am

Post by Bettman's Bender »

Whiner33 wrote:
pats12 wrote:Delay of game, 2 min penalty - A player or goaltender intentionally knocks the net's goalpost off its moorings, which stops the play.

What if it happens 15 times in one game by a goalie?
Ask JOE!! Never knew he had such a great vertical!
Put some clothes on Luverne, your true character is showing. Regardless of your record, or if you eventually win the section... You are not champions.

You cry for respect but use your next breath to make excuses and make unnecessary slander.

I sure hope you all get what is coming to you.

OLE!
Kinda_Normal_Tendy
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 3:38 am

Post by Kinda_Normal_Tendy »

Whiner33 wrote:
pats12 wrote:Delay of game, 2 min penalty - A player or goaltender intentionally knocks the net's goalpost off its moorings, which stops the play.

What if it happens 15 times in one game by a goalie?
Ask JOE!! Never knew he had such a great vertical!
I would love to know how many times either of you have ever played goalie, or if you even know anything about it. Once the net comes off once there is a groove in the ice which makes the force needed to push the net off little to nothing. I wasn't there and didn't see and this case could have been very blatant, but when playing goalie you use your posts as a point of reference as to where you are in the net, the slightest bump at times can push the net off if it has came off previously in that period. Maybe the refs should have put some water in the grove after putting the net back into place and allowed it to freeze? I wouldn't be so quick to point the goalie as doing it intentionally unless it was very very blatant.
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

Bettman's Bender wrote:
Whiner33 wrote:
pats12 wrote:Delay of game, 2 min penalty - A player or goaltender intentionally knocks the net's goalpost off its moorings, which stops the play.

What if it happens 15 times in one game by a goalie?
Ask JOE!! Never knew he had such a great vertical!
Put some clothes on Luverne, your true character is showing. Regardless of your record, or if you eventually win the section... You are not champions.

You cry for respect but use your next breath to make excuses and make unnecessary slander.

I sure hope you all get what is coming to you.

OLE!
So Luverne wouldn't get a section champion banner if they win the section? bummer dude
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

Kinda_Normal_Tendy wrote:
Whiner33 wrote:
pats12 wrote:Delay of game, 2 min penalty - A player or goaltender intentionally knocks the net's goalpost off its moorings, which stops the play.

What if it happens 15 times in one game by a goalie?
Ask JOE!! Never knew he had such a great vertical!
I would love to know how many times either of you have ever played goalie, or if you even know anything about it. Once the net comes off once there is a groove in the ice which makes the force needed to push the net off little to nothing. I wasn't there and didn't see and this case could have been very blatant, but when playing goalie you use your posts as a point of reference as to where you are in the net, the slightest bump at times can push the net off if it has came off previously in that period. Maybe the refs should have put some water in the grove after putting the net back into place and allowed it to freeze? I wouldn't be so quick to point the goalie as doing it intentionally unless it was very very blatant.
It appeared very blatant to me. I don't know if it was 2 "very's", but i think 1 "very" blatant was warranted. Water was applied several times by the officiating crew on both ends Redwood was defending. The net didn't come off on Luverne's tender like it did for Redwood's.

Tactically it wasn't a bad decision by Stremcha to have him kick it off. It was a firing range out there, and many (15 ish) situations where tremendous pressure was being put on redwood the goalie kicked the net off. I can't blame him, hell, it almost worked for him.....
Whiner33
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am

Post by Whiner33 »

Bettman's Bender wrote:
Whiner33 wrote:
pats12 wrote:Delay of game, 2 min penalty - A player or goaltender intentionally knocks the net's goalpost off its moorings, which stops the play.

What if it happens 15 times in one game by a goalie?
Ask JOE!! Never knew he had such a great vertical!
Put some clothes on Luverne, your true character is showing. Regardless of your record, or if you eventually win the section... You are not champions.

You cry for respect but use your next breath to make excuses and make unnecessary slander.

I sure hope you all get what is coming to you.

OLE!
Pull the goalie! The black lab looks pretty cute!
Bettman's Bender
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:18 am

Post by Bettman's Bender »

Whiner33 wrote:
Bettman's Bender wrote:
Whiner33 wrote: Ask JOE!! Never knew he had such a great vertical!
Put some clothes on Luverne, your true character is showing. Regardless of your record, or if you eventually win the section... You are not champions.

You cry for respect but use your next breath to make excuses and make unnecessary slander.

I sure hope you all get what is coming to you.

OLE!
Pull the goalie! The black lab looks pretty cute!
This might be funny if I had the slightest clue what a black lab has to do with anything.

FTR I still think Luverne wins the section... It is what it is.
Whiner33
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am

Post by Whiner33 »

The Bad Boys of 3A are on their way!!! #ROLLCARDSROLL
InYourFace09
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by InYourFace09 »

Marshall and Luverne tied thru 1?
RRubberbeeskit
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:23 am

Post by RRubberbeeskit »

InYourFace09 wrote:Marshall and Luverne tied thru 1?
Is the hub score correct at 4-4 ?
InYourFace09
Posts: 479
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by InYourFace09 »

RRubberbeeskit wrote:
InYourFace09 wrote:Marshall and Luverne tied thru 1?
Is the hub score correct at 4-4 ?
It appears everything is doubled, I would assume it is 2-2?
RRubberbeeskit
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:23 am

Post by RRubberbeeskit »

notTONIGHT wrote:
Kinda_Normal_Tendy wrote:
Whiner33 wrote: Ask JOE!! Never knew he had such a great vertical!
I would love to know how many times either of you have ever played goalie, or if you even know anything about it. Once the net comes off once there is a groove in the ice which makes the force needed to push the net off little to nothing. I wasn't there and didn't see and this case could have been very blatant, but when playing goalie you use your posts as a point of reference as to where you are in the net, the slightest bump at times can push the net off if it has came off previously in that period. Maybe the refs should have put some water in the grove after putting the net back into place and allowed it to freeze? I wouldn't be so quick to point the goalie as doing it intentionally unless it was very very blatant.
It appeared very blatant to me. I don't know if it was 2 "very's", but i think 1 "very" blatant was warranted. Water was applied several times by the officiating crew on both ends Redwood was defending. The net didn't come off on Luverne's tender like it did for Redwood's.

Tactically it wasn't a bad decision by Stremcha to have him kick it off. It was a firing range out there, and many (15 ish) situations where tremendous pressure was being put on redwood the goalie kicked the net off. I can't blame him, hell, it almost worked for him.....
I remember a Little Falls goalie M Stumph a couple years back conveniently dislodging the goal a half doz times in a game when the pressure got heated near the crease in Sec. Semi final game. This went on from his soph - Sr. Yrs. He was the #1 Sec. 6A goalie. Very good.
pats12
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:53 pm

Post by pats12 »

Running time in Gustavus. Luverne up 9-2. Marshall hasn't had a shot on goal yet in the 3rd.
rollCARDSroll
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:54 pm

Post by rollCARDSroll »

pats12 wrote:Running time in Gustavus. Luverne up 9-2. Marshall hasn't had a shot on goal yet in the 3rd.

That got ugly!

Running time in a semi final?

We're back!

ROLL CARDS ROLL! !
Whiner33
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am

Post by Whiner33 »

rollCARDSroll wrote:
pats12 wrote:Running time in Gustavus. Luverne up 9-2. Marshall hasn't had a shot on goal yet in the 3rd.

That got ugly!

Running time in a semi final?

We're back!

ROLL CARDS ROLL! !
OLE???
wooshlager
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 2:17 pm

Post by wooshlager »

Per FTP

New Ulm 6
Hutch 5

FINAL/OT
notTONIGHT
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:05 pm

Post by notTONIGHT »

Trout what happened to the super sniper?

You were previously diagnosed with CHOS is it Flaring up again???


Roll Cards!
Post Reply