Hill/WBL
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:17 pm
Hill/WBL
If the Bears play well, can they beat a struggling Hill?
Re: Hill/WBL
I doubt it. The Bears seem to play much better come sections. I don't see them winning this game.inthetwine wrote:If the Bears play well, can they beat a struggling Hill?
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 11:03 am
-
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:59 pm
I would say both teams are down this year. not as much depth on either team and not as many high impact players. Maybe a few for Hill and 1 or 2 for WBL. I think this could be Stillwater's year. However, none the less, I'm sure it will be entertaining. Oh and to clarify, this is not a rip on either team, every team goes through their down seasons.
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:53 am
-
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:12 pm
-
- Posts: 1660
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:43 pm
Huh? Has WBL even beaten Hill twice in the last ten years? I'm referring to the one scheduled game, not any Schwan's games, or any section games.Nuts&Bolts wrote:I'd say White Bear has a good shot at beating HM or losing or even tying. Could 'easily' see the Bears pulling a mild upset in this one as the scoring for HM hasn't clicked in (yet?). Will be very different if they play again in February. The game early in the year seems to favor White Bear.
Way to go out on a limb with that prediction!Nuts&Bolts wrote:I'd say White Bear has a good shot at beating HM or losing or even tying.
Any why do you say that? First of all, this is the first time they have played this early in the season in a long, long, time. Second, I can't even remember the last time WBL won a game against HM during the season. (I'm sure Starlimb could let us know.Nuts&Bolts wrote:The game early in the year seems to favor White Bear.

-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:32 pm
-
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:32 pm
I have no answer to this question. The future of White Bear hockey looks average at best which is really sad.MNHockeyFan wrote:No Bear or Pioneer in this race, but what's to explain the WBL decline? Not exactly an inner ring suburb, so you wouldn't think changing "demographics" is the reason. Or maybe it is?WBLHockeyfan04 wrote:The sad thing is this Hill team is pretty average too, and WBL had no chance.
Its an older community, with not a ton of younger families. Im sure it will be a few years before that trend reverses as the older generation moves into condos/apartments and younger families move into WBL again.MNHockeyFan wrote:No Bear or Pioneer in this race, but what's to explain the WBL decline? Not exactly an inner ring suburb, so you wouldn't think changing "demographics" is the reason. Or maybe it is?WBLHockeyfan04 wrote:The sad thing is this Hill team is pretty average too, and WBL had no chance.
State ‘83, ‘91, ‘08, ‘20
-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:17 pm
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 12:33 pm
wbl-Hill
"Parenteau for the love of god" WBL finally decides to schedule a tough non-conference...besides Wyatt Newpower this team stinks...lose to 1-4 Roseville....WBL goes 14-11 at best to end the regular season.
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:26 pm
This was one of, if not the most bizarre hockey games I have ever seen. Four SHG in one game, two on the same damn penalty, and all the while it was actually far from a blowout! Shots were relatively close, the Bears had chances, and had they not completely blown their power plays they actually had a legitimate shot at winning this game.
The worst part in all of this is how this rivalry has fallen. The crowd was small, the atmosphere on both sides was nonexistent, and it just did not feel anything like any previous matchup between these two teams before. Scheduling it this early was a big mistake, though the talent level of both teams wouldn't have helped that much.
Maybe we'll get a rematch for the first time in 3 years, though it'll probably be in the semis. Ironically, one of the biggest reasons I started The Horn was to broadcast these games, and I've only had one regular season game each of the last two seasons. It's a darn shame.
The worst part in all of this is how this rivalry has fallen. The crowd was small, the atmosphere on both sides was nonexistent, and it just did not feel anything like any previous matchup between these two teams before. Scheduling it this early was a big mistake, though the talent level of both teams wouldn't have helped that much.
Maybe we'll get a rematch for the first time in 3 years, though it'll probably be in the semis. Ironically, one of the biggest reasons I started The Horn was to broadcast these games, and I've only had one regular season game each of the last two seasons. It's a darn shame.
HM - WBL
I was also thinking after the game about this great rivalry and wondered what has happened. I had to go back and look at the records to see if it was real. It was. For 17 seasons and 43 games from 1989 through 2005, Hill-Murray won 23 times, White Bear Lake won 19 times and there was 1 tie. WBL went to the state tournament 9 times and HM went 7 times. There were many great games - great comebacks, OT games, underdog victories, huge crowds at Aldrich and packed section finals at the Met Center, Mariucci and the Coliseum. In the 10 years since then, HM is 20-1 and has won the section 8 times to 1 for WBL. White Bear's youth program looks just as big and as strong as in the past - maybe passed by a bit by Stillwater's. The only major difference at WBL appears to be the coach.