Early Departures 2018-19
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:07 pm
I tend to agree with his entire post......except, I think it’s a stretch to consider the USHL the equal of Canadian Major junior. Just so much really high end talent in O,W and Q. I believe most hockey experts would rank the CHL the second best amateur league in North America. NCAA is at the top just due to the age difference between the two leagues. I’ve been fortunate to have had the chance to watch a three or four year window of birth years work their way through post high school hockey and am amazed at how difficult it is for even the best players to find success. It’s a real grind and as Exiled mentioned it takes a true love for the game to make it.
-
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:07 pm
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Very hard to get a true comparison, but the USHL self proclaims that they're the junior league with the most NHL draft picks last year... per size maybe...?keepyourheadup wrote:I tend to agree with his entire post......except, I think it’s a stretch to consider the USHL the equal of Canadian Major junior. Just so much really high end talent in O,W and Q. I believe most hockey experts would rank the CHL the second best amateur league in North America. NCAA is at the top just due to the age difference between the two leagues. I’ve been fortunate to have had the chance to watch a three or four year window of birth years work their way through post high school hockey and am amazed at how difficult it is for even the best players to find success. It’s a real grind and as Exiled mentioned it takes a true love for the game to make it.
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:44 am
This bit may eventually deserve its own thread, but I think it's worth pointing out that there are still no rules on when a kid can and cannot verbally commit. The new rules simply make it a lot tougher to commit early with virtually no contact allowed between a college staff and high school player until junior year. As always, loopholes will likely be found.yesiplayedhockey wrote:
Also, in case you haven't seen, the game just changed this past week. Kids won't be VERBALLY committing to D-1 scholarships as 9th and 10th graders. It will be interesting to see if that helps the WHL or has no impact
Is your real name, Francis?ilovemesomehockey wrote:O-townClown wrote:I need to see her LOLformersection3Afan wrote: Maybe the attractive mom factor?
Hahaha. OF COURSE, it must be the tatas. You guys are ridiculous. Maybe the coach doesnt like the kid. Maybe the parents think the coach is an a$$hat. Maybe the kid wants to play hockey somewhere he is appreciated. Maybe, just maybe, its none of your business. So happy my kids are done with this sport. I tolerated it, with much distress, hanging out with all the folks KNOWING their kids were going big time (and honestly I was one of them at one time - thankfully I came to my senses). But every move we made benefitted him in nonhockey ways (a coach who believed in him, gave him confidence again, and is part of the reason he is the success he is today - proudly serving your country for your freedom).And I never had to show clevage. Get a life and maybe start worrying about your own kids personal development than someone elses kid. Championships fade. An outstanding citizen prepared well for this world (a parents real job, right?), will not
How so? The players are not being financially compensated for playing hockey. The provision of room and board is no different than players in other sports attending a boarding school on financial aid. The primary distinction is that junior hockey players often have graduated from high school already, but that only impacts the academic courseload they can take. All NCAA athletes have five years of full-time attendance to complete four years of eligibility, so junior hockey players must avoid taking a full load of college classes to prevent this clock from starting. Again, that is true of any prospective NCAA athlete, and not just junior hockey players.goldy313 wrote:The NCAA gives a special exemption to junior hockey they do not give in any other sport. Because of this the USHL is a primary league for most US kids where as the same league would compromise your amateur status in almost all other NCAA sports.
College hockey is unique in its heavy reliance on older players, but that doesn’t mean that the same eligibility standards aren’t applied.
Read the NCAA's definition and rules concerning amateurism. It clearly states Amateurusm does not allow delayed initial full time college enrollment to participate in organized sport competition. (Even Olympic athletes need a waiver) Junior hockey violates this but is given an exemption and has for a long time now.
Thanks for the explanation, and that makes sense. Aside from the kerfuffle over the Big Ten age limit proposal last year, I know that a few of the Ivy League programs were facing pressure from their academic administrations over admissions of junior hockey players, who have essentially been away from academics for two years in many cases. But I think that controversy largely blew over after Yale won the 2013 national championship with a number of former junior players on the roster.goldy313 wrote:Read the NCAA's definition and rules concerning amateurism. It clearly states Amateurusm does not allow delayed initial full time college enrollment to participate in organized sport competition. (Even Olympic athletes need a waiver) Junior hockey violates this but is given an exemption and has for a long time now.
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
-
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:26 pm
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:44 am
If I remember correctly it was something like this:
Brink (Tonka) staying
Koster (Chaska) staying
Frisch (Moorhead) leaving
Brodzinski (Blaine) leaving
I might be missing another staying/leaving, and then it mentioned a lot of transfers. Kittelson to Tonka, Huber to HF, Messenberg to BSM, Dexheimer to Blake, and many others.
Brink (Tonka) staying
Koster (Chaska) staying
Frisch (Moorhead) leaving
Brodzinski (Blaine) leaving
I might be missing another staying/leaving, and then it mentioned a lot of transfers. Kittelson to Tonka, Huber to HF, Messenberg to BSM, Dexheimer to Blake, and many others.
-
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
- Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:44 am
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:58 pm
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:44 am
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:44 am
Interesting. The fact he hasn’t signed with WHL team is the key point. I believe major junior players can still do Nat Camp as Hanus attended the national Select 17 camp this summer.WestMetro wrote:62
My info is he never signed with WHL, was at Nat Camp in Buffalo , not on ice for LVN Tonka scrimmage a couple weeks ago . And not on Elite roster. At this point seems like things are uncertain . Maybe Minnscout knows more.
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 5:28 pm
Would not have made the Elite League, would not have received a tryout invite.WestMetro wrote:62
My info is he never signed with WHL, was at Nat Camp in Buffalo , not on ice for LVN Tonka scrimmage a couple weeks ago . And not on Elite roster. At this point seems like things are uncertain . Maybe Minnscout knows more.