Top team in each section
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:06 am
Top team in each section
Next year Girls Hockey will be going to 8 teams participating in "A" and "AA". What team will be the favorite in each section? <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
Re: Top team in each section
I think this is a good place to start, then consider losses/additions, etc.:<br><br>bottom has by old section...<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.bgoski.com/simley/girls/Rank ... <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Plus - section changes... <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... ckeyfan</A> at: 5/12/06 9:36 am<br></i>
-
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
Re: Top team in each section
A section ranking for NEXT year based on LAST year's ratings... It's a starting point...<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.bgoski.com/simley/girls/Rank ... <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.bgoski.com/simley/girls/SOS0 ... <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>CLASS A:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>1 1 Austin 19.470 90 74.241 29 21 8 0<br>1 2 Mankato West 13.535 82 71.462 27 16 8 3<br>1 3 Faribault 6.369 93 75.773 24 14 10 0<br>1 4 Albert Lea Tigers 6.149 67 66.000 27 11 13 3<br>1 5 Northfield 1.719 87 73.913 23 9 13 1<br>1 6 Waseca 0.944 116 95.042 24 12 11 1<br>1 7 Mankato East 0.216 86 73.783 25 3 22 0<br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>2        1                Farmington        92.273        61        58.586        29        23        6        0<br>2        2                New Prague        55.619        58        56.700        30        21        9        0<br>2        3                Simley        10.539        17        38.074        27        7        19        1<br>2        4                Richfield        4.172        42        48.846        27        7        20        0<br>2        5                St. Paul United        2.528        81        71.280        26        10        16        0<br>2        6                Red Wing        0.262        68        66.208        25        3        22        0<br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>3        1                New Ulm        14.524        110        86.917        25        18        6        1<br>3        2                Marshall        5.227        117        96.560        27        20        6        1<br>3        3                St. Peter/Lesueur-Henderson        0.537        114        93.167        24        10        13        1<br>3        4                Windom Area Eagles        0.049        126        108.125        24        8        16        0<br>3        5                Luverne        0.006        123        104.000        24        5        19        0<br>3        6                Redwood Valley        0.001        125        107.588        17        0        17        0<br>3        7                Worthington        0.001        122        103.238        22        2        20        0<br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>4        1                South St. Paul        321.620        7        33.400        30        23        6        1<br>4        2                Blake        149.059        56        54.852        27        20        5        2<br>4        3                Mahtomedi        22.514        37        46.643        28        13        14        1<br>4        4                Totino-Grace        19.033        60        58.571        28        16        12        0<br>4        5                St. Agnes/St. Bernards/Concordia Academy        0.594        98        80.045        25        7        15        3<br>4        6                Minnehaha Academy        0.333        108        82.885        26        5        19        2<br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>5        1                Shakopee        21.131        72        67.038        27        18        9        0<br>5        2                Breck        8.128        76        67.885        26        13        11        2<br>5        3                Mound-Westonka        2.717        107        82.704        27        13        14        0<br>5        4                St. Louis Park        2.696        57        55.846        26        6        20        0<br>5        5                Hutchinson        1.967        70        66.808        26        8        16        2<br>5        6                Orono        1.070        104        81.704        27        8        17        2<br>5        7                Litchfield/Dassel-Cokato        0.333        115        94.148        27        9        18        0<br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>6        1                Alexandria        59.272        85        72.900        30        23        3        4<br>6        2                Fergus Falls        2.553        77        68.280        25        9        16        0<br>6        3                Detroit Lakes        2.140        96        77.955        23        10        12        1<br>6        4                Morris/Benson/Hancock        0.821        118        97.957        23        13        10        0<br>6        5                Long Prairie-Grey Eagle/Wadena-Deer Cr        0.759        121        102.958        25        14        10        1<br>6        6                Park Rapids        0.367        111        88.947        19        4        15        0<br>6        7                Willmar        0.093        95        77.080        25        2        23        0<br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>7        1                Hibbing        203.030        10        34.679        28        18        8        2<br>7        2                Silver Bay/Two Harbors        19.347        105        81.833        28        21        7        0<br>7        3                Eveleth        0.209        109        83.095        24        6        18        0<br>7        4                Babbitt-Embarrass        0.144        113        91.533        17        4        13        0<br>7        5                Moose Lake        0.127        112        90.100        26        6        18        2<br>7        6                Princeton        0.058        102        81.391        23        0        22        1<br>7        7                Little Falls        0.045        100        80.115        26        1        25        0<br><br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>8        1                Warroad        229.209        23        40.286        30        23        6        1<br>8        2                Crookston        46.520        91        74.269        27        21        5        1<br>8        3                Roseau        11.575        59        57.444        27        13        14        0<br>8        4                International Falls        1.572        89        74.083        26        11        14        1<br>8        5                Thief River Falls        1.074        92        74.875        24        8        16        0<br>8        6                East Grand Forks        0.824        99        80.091        24        7        16        1<br>8        7                Lake of the Woods        0.529        97        79.619        26        7        18        1<br><br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>CLASS AA:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>1        1                Roch. Mayo        95.297        52        52.767        30        22        8        0<br>1        2                Lakev. North        13.631        53        53.815        27        12        14        1<br>1        3                Owatonna        10.819        69        66.214        28        14        11        3<br>1        4                Lakev. South        5.684        44        50.038        26        7        18        1<br>1        5                Winona Winhawks        4.429        75        67.684        21        7        13        1<br>1        6                Roch. John Marshall/Century        3.147        62        59.560        27        8        18        1<br>1        7                Dodge County        0.712        124        105.579        22        14        8        0<br>1        8                Fairmont        0.088        119        99.480        25        8        17        0<br><br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>2        1        1        Roseville        382.715        5        31.581        31        23        8        0<br>2        2        2        Henry Sibley        131.493        28        41.385        25        18        7        0<br>2        3        3        St. Paul Blades        83.745        71        67.000        28        23        5        0<br>2        4        4        Hill-Murray Pioneers        46.314        4        31.115        26        10        14        2<br>2        5        5        Hastings        38.282        17        38.074        27        12        12        3<br>2        6        6        Woodbury        8.486        21        39.160        26        7        18        1<br>2        7        7        Park of Cottage Grove        6.019        13        36.185        26        4        22        0<br>2        8        8        Tartan        0.369        120        99.500        12        4        7        1<br><br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>3        1        1        Stillwater        924.061        6        32.129        31        27        4        0<br>3        2        2        North St. Paul Polars        476.892        19        38.679        28        23        4        1<br>3        3        3        Centennial        174.763        27        41.222        27        19        6        2<br>3        4        4        White Bear Lake        43.511        8        33.808        26        10        12        4<br>3        5        5        Blaine        42.835        15        37.111        27        12        14        1<br>3        6        6        Irondale        14.924        66        63.885        26        15        11        0<br>3        7        7        Mounds View        8.659        9        34.269        26        5        20        1<br>3        8        8        Spring Lake Park/St. Anthony        6.342        65        63.444        27        12        15        0<br>3        9        9        Tri-City        0.196        106        82.520        26        3        21        2<br><br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>4        1        1        Coon Rapids        274.341        36        46.419        31        25        4        2<br>4        2        2        Anoka        114.622        24        40.370        27        17        9        1<br>4        3        3        Maple Grove        70.468        39        47.000        28        17        9        2<br>4        4        4        Park Center        20.617        49        51.115        26        12        12        2<br>4        5        5        Rob. Armstrong        9.448        41        48.519        27        9        16        2<br>4        6        6        Andover        6.785        22        39.480        25        5        19        1<br>4        7        7        Osseo        1.931        38        46.889        27        4        22        1<br>4        8        8        Rogers        1.540        94        76.889        27        8        17        2<br>4        9        9        Rob. Cooper        1.408        79        68.462        26        6        19        1<br>4        10        10        Champlin Park        1.192        34        45.885        26        2        23        1<br><br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>5        1        1        Academy of Holy Angels        216.213        29        41.633        30        22        7        1<br>5        2        2        Burnsville        210.233        30        43.679        28        21        7        0<br>5        3        3        Cretin-Derham Hall        203.995        15        37.111        27        18        6        3<br>5        4        4        Eagan        136.068        32        45.222        27        19        7        1<br>5        5        5        Eastview        18.280        20        39.000        26        8        15        3<br>5        6        6        Apple Valley        11.342        47        50.840        25        9        13        3<br>5        7        7        Minneapolis Novas        2.759        83        72.231        26        9        13        4<br>5        8        8        Bloom. Kennedy        1.622        45        50.500        27        5        22        0<br>5        9        9        Rosemount        1.377        80        68.846        26        7        17        2<br><br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>6        1        1        Eden Prairie        9509.087        11        34.935        31        31        0        0<br>6        2        2        Benilde-St. Margarets        449.615        25        40.407        27        23        4        0<br>6        3        3        Wayzata        370.798        1        26.714        28        20        8        0<br>6        4        4        Edina        267.626        3        29.481        27        17        7        3<br>6        5        5        Hopkins        146.220        12        35.885        26        17        8        1<br>6        6        6        Chaska        68.340        48        51.000        26        17        8        1<br>6        7        8        Bloom. Jefferson        18.974        33        45.769        26        11        14        1<br>6        8        7        Prior Lake        18.837        55        54.296        27        14        13        0<br>6        9        9        Minnetonka        17.138        40        48.480        25        11        13        1<br><br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>7        1        1        Cloquet/Esko/Carlton        556.288        2        27.967        31        24        6        1<br>7        2        2        Grand Rapids/Greenway        57.675        14        36.250        28        15        13        0<br>7        3        3        Chisago Lakes/Pine City        36.479        43        49.038        27        16        10        1<br>7        4        4        St. Francis/North Branch        33.679        64        61.038        27        18        7        2<br>7        5        5        Forest Lake        21.708        31        44.000        26        11        13        2<br>7        6        6        Duluth East        17.176        50        52.087        26        14        12        0<br>7        7        7        Proctor/Hermantown/Marshall        16.411        74        67.500        26        17        9        0<br>7        8        8        Cambridge-Isanti        12.965        103        81.692        26        17        5        4<br>7        9        9        Duluth Central/Denfeld        2.211        51        52.750        26        7        19        0<br><br><br>SEC # RK PV TEAM RATING RK RATING GP W L T<br>8        1        1        Bemidji        177.075        46        50.821        28        22        4        2<br>8        2        2        Elk River        96.881        26        40.481        27        16        9        2<br>8        3        3        Moorhead        74.819        35        45.893        29        19        10        0<br>8        4        4        St. Cld. Tech        39.535        63        59.769        26        17        7        2<br>8        5        5        Sartell/Sauk Rapids Stormn Sabres        19.756        88        74.037        27        17        6        4<br>8        6        6        Brainerd        7.840        73        67.385        26        12        12        2<br>8        7        7        Buffalo        7.773        54        54.000        27        10        16        1<br>8        8        8        River Lakes Stars        7.098        84        72.556        27        13        11        3<br>8        9        9        St. Cld. Icebreakers        6.075        78        68.440        26        12        13        1<br>8        10        10        North Wright County River Hawks        3.905        101        81.269        26        13        12        1<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... ckeyfan</A> at: 5/12/06 12:56 pm<br></i>
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 am
Re: Top team in each section
How about discussing rankings instead?<br><br>#1: EP stays #1. It sounds like they have at least one high profile transfer coming in and maybe two. Still the team to beat. The question is, "How long will their winning streak continue? <br><br>Top ten all year: Cloquet, Roseville, Holy Angels, Edina, & BSM keep their spots in the top ten all year. All have good programs that are team oriented. Significant losses of Thunstrum, Hogan, Scavo, Jones, Zilles, C. Lee & Tiff Johnson too much for NSP,Stillwater and Wayzata in short term, however, they will be back and soon.<br><br>Top ten consideration to start: Coon Rapids, Centennial, Eagan, Mayo and Henry Sibley could be near the top ten and trying to keep Stillwater and Wayzata from getting back into top ten.<br><br>Potential Top Ten sleepers: Grand Rapids and Hill-Murray.<br><br>And yes this list does include my opinion of all of the Class A teams that should be given top ten consideration....None. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
Re: Top team in each section
Far too early to tell as far as deciding a top 10. But fun speculating isn't it? I will wait to see what transfers happen. Also, coaching change has an impact on programs - period of acclimation. Have to factor all that in.<br><br>Easier now to guess as to some top teams in new sections for A I think, as well as the same AA sections (with the exception of LV S to 1AA).<br><br>Cloquet lost a great player in Maunu, good player in Rodd... I still think they have some other top players returning though including Thunder in nets. Lundquist is very strong - Anderson & others should help too.<br><br>I'd agree on Class A hockey. It is now what it was meant to be all along, a different class with different resources than the big schools and big draw privates have. Should be fun to see Class A get a chance to send true Class A teams to state this year. May not be many fans, but I think this is a far better setup than what we had before - but then again, I am biased... <p></p><i></i>
Re: Top team in each section
I think most of the same teams have a great shot at being back at the State Tournament next year. I think New Ulm will have a great shot at the Class A title. Sleepers in class A? Too early to tell - but it sure will be fun to see a bunch of new teams in the expanded A bracket.<br><br>In AA most of the outstate teams should again dominate their sections and return to State (Moorhead, Cloquet, Mayo). I think CDH will win section 5, and Coon Rapids will get bumped out by someone - maybe Anoka? E.P. will really get pushed this year, but if they get more transfers and don't have any injuries, who can beat them? I think both Cloquet and Mayo will really make some noise this year. Where does that leave some really good teams? It's really hard to believe teams like Benilde, Wayzata, Edina, Centennial, and Holy Angels could be on the sidelines. <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 7:35 am
Re: Top team in each section
Metrolink - did you really mean "New Ulm" will have a good chance of winning the Class A title? If so, do you know something we don't? Please explain! <p></p><i></i>
Re: Top team in each section
Do you really think New Ulm? I can't forget how they were dominated by New Prague and Austin last year. And between the two, New Prague was the only state team. New Ulm will easily make it to state with the easiest section but after that? <p></p><i></i>
Re: Top team in each section
Big booboo by me - you guys are right - I meant New Prague. New Ulm should be very competitive in their section though. Good catch!! <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
A Sections... & key losses
By ranking - these are the teams that would have been tops in the new A sections for next season.
(RU = Runner Up)
1 Austin RU Mankato W
2 Farmington RU NP
3 New Ulm RU Marshall
4 SSP RU Blake
5 Shakopee RU Breck
6 Alex RU Fergus F
7 Hibbing RU Silver Bay
8 Warroad RU Crookston
Some of these teams have changed greatly due to graduation/etc. coming into next season.
Some Key losses:
Farmington - Flor.
SSP - Robertson, Bloemers, Stohr, Mueller, Porter (G).
Shakopee - Ka. Ledel & Brown (G).
Warroad - Mosher, Dunkel, and Roberts.
Hibbing - Krause (G).
(RU = Runner Up)
1 Austin RU Mankato W
2 Farmington RU NP
3 New Ulm RU Marshall
4 SSP RU Blake
5 Shakopee RU Breck
6 Alex RU Fergus F
7 Hibbing RU Silver Bay
8 Warroad RU Crookston
Some of these teams have changed greatly due to graduation/etc. coming into next season.
Some Key losses:
Farmington - Flor.
SSP - Robertson, Bloemers, Stohr, Mueller, Porter (G).
Shakopee - Ka. Ledel & Brown (G).
Warroad - Mosher, Dunkel, and Roberts.
Hibbing - Krause (G).
-
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:33 pm
- Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
- Contact:
Re: Top team in each section
gopherslapshot77
Registered Member
Posts: 14
(5/14/06 8:39 pm)
Reply Re: Top team in each section
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ssp probably takes the biggest loss to graduation in class a. from what i saw of them during the state tourney this past year, they didn't have much depth, rotating through only two lines. unless they get new transfers in, i'd guess this could be one of the first "rebuilding" years for ssp. a question i have is- has ssp ever had a losing season? i heard somewhere that this was the first year they didn't win their conference??
looking ahead, i would take blake to win that section, i was impressed by them all year long, and if i recall right, most of them are underclassmen?? i agree on new prague also having a great shot at the class a title, but i think overall, anyone could win it. i guess we'll have to wait and see!
ghshockeyfan
Registered Member
Posts: 5026
(5/14/06 9:03 pm)
Reply | Edit Re: Top team in each section
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSP will find a way to be competitive I'm sure.
Blake:
Player Stats G A Pts.
1 Katharine Chute 27 24 51 (Jr)
2 Clare Zutz 19 30 49 (Sr)
3 Berit Johnson 10 31 41 (Sr)
4 Laura Komarek 18 14 32 (Jr)
5 Alyssa Saunders 13 17 30 (Sr)
6 Margaret Chute 13 16 29 (Fr)
7 Sally Komarek 15 14 29 (Fr)
8 Molly Stankovsky 2 13 15 (Sr)
Some key losses, but also some nice returning players (including a few real nice young players)...
NP is a top choice to win it all with the majority of their team returning, but I have a hunch that Farmington in section 2 won't be an easy team to get past... I'm sure that NP won't look past the section, even though they are a very likely state champion.
Section 2A will play with only 6 teams, with 2 QF high-seed-host games on Wed 2/7, and then will play the SF 1p/3p on Sat 2/10 & Championship on Fri 2/16 7PM @ Aldrich. Seeds 1 & 2 both get a bye to the semis.
Registered Member
Posts: 14
(5/14/06 8:39 pm)
Reply Re: Top team in each section
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ssp probably takes the biggest loss to graduation in class a. from what i saw of them during the state tourney this past year, they didn't have much depth, rotating through only two lines. unless they get new transfers in, i'd guess this could be one of the first "rebuilding" years for ssp. a question i have is- has ssp ever had a losing season? i heard somewhere that this was the first year they didn't win their conference??
looking ahead, i would take blake to win that section, i was impressed by them all year long, and if i recall right, most of them are underclassmen?? i agree on new prague also having a great shot at the class a title, but i think overall, anyone could win it. i guess we'll have to wait and see!
ghshockeyfan
Registered Member
Posts: 5026
(5/14/06 9:03 pm)
Reply | Edit Re: Top team in each section
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSP will find a way to be competitive I'm sure.
Blake:
Player Stats G A Pts.
1 Katharine Chute 27 24 51 (Jr)
2 Clare Zutz 19 30 49 (Sr)
3 Berit Johnson 10 31 41 (Sr)
4 Laura Komarek 18 14 32 (Jr)
5 Alyssa Saunders 13 17 30 (Sr)
6 Margaret Chute 13 16 29 (Fr)
7 Sally Komarek 15 14 29 (Fr)
8 Molly Stankovsky 2 13 15 (Sr)
Some key losses, but also some nice returning players (including a few real nice young players)...
NP is a top choice to win it all with the majority of their team returning, but I have a hunch that Farmington in section 2 won't be an easy team to get past... I'm sure that NP won't look past the section, even though they are a very likely state champion.
Section 2A will play with only 6 teams, with 2 QF high-seed-host games on Wed 2/7, and then will play the SF 1p/3p on Sat 2/10 & Championship on Fri 2/16 7PM @ Aldrich. Seeds 1 & 2 both get a bye to the semis.