NHL

The Only Forum for Non-Hockey Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
ChrisK
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 12:39 am

NHL

Post by ChrisK »

I guess I must be desperate for hockey because I taped the Wild game last night and watched it after work.<br><br>Any thoughts on the new rule changes? I thought it looked more open and freewheeling, it was a lot more fun to watch. <br><br>The only changes that I don't like that much are the restrictions on goalies playing the puck. <p></p><i></i>
hawkfan70
Posts: 1316
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:59 am
Location: City of Hockey in Minnesota

Re: NHL

Post by hawkfan70 »

Why not let the goalie play the puck anywhere he wants, but then he is fair game.<br>I am sure that will keep him in the crease <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... wkfan70</A> at: 10/7/05 5:44 am<br></i>
ChrisK
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 12:39 am

Re: NHL

Post by ChrisK »

From an offensive standpoint don't you want to get the goalie out of position? If he has more opportunity to play the puck, chances go up that he'll misplay the puck or otherwise end up out of position. <br><br>The other rules seem to do enough to open the game up (I do hope they keep calling obstruction as tight as they did last night), but the goalie rules for playing the puck seem too restrictive. One of the best high school games in the last few years, Breck v. SSP in the Class A semis two years ago, featured a goalie, Alex Stalock, who constantly played the puck and tried to spark rushes by passing the puck. He ended up out of position a number of times but made some spectacular stops to save himself. I am not that familiar with the NHL, but I'm sure there are NHL goalies who play that way (and probably drive their coaches crazy) and it seems a shame to restrict their talent. <p></p><i></i>
EREmpireStrikesBack
Posts: 5140
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: NHL

Post by EREmpireStrikesBack »

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I'm sure there are NHL goalies who play that way (and probably drive their coaches crazy) and it seems a shame to restrict their talent.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Martin Brodeur & Marty Turco are two that come to mind.<br><br>I totally agree, I think that they should allow the goalies to play the puck, just make them fair game like the other players. The goalies that can't play the puck would stay in the net. <p>Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls</p><i></i>
packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Re: NHL

Post by packerboy »

Say,...um...... ah ...maybe somebody should tell the Wild about all the new rules and how there will be more scoring and stuff. <p></p><i></i>
ChrisK
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 12:39 am

Re: NHL

Post by ChrisK »

They did well in that first game, but old habits die hard packerboy. <p></p><i></i>
slapshooter
Posts: 4100
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:30 pm

Take it all the way.......by SS

Post by slapshooter »

<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>They should let the goalies take it all the way up and</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>score if they want to like I used to when I played goalie<br><br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>at recess in grade school all the time!</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :evil --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/devil.gif ALT=":evil"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ~> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/nerd.gif ALT="8o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <~<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>And the "fair game " thing?</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Who's bound to come out in better shape in the event of a</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>collision?</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The one with the little pads and the skinny stick??</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->( <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/embarassed.gif ALT=":o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> )<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Or the one with with the BIG STICK and the bullet proof</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>outfit on??? </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> { <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :evil --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/devil.gif ALT=":evil"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> } <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ~~> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/nerd.gif ALT="8o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <~~ <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> { <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :evil --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/devil.gif ALT=":evil"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> }<br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>L<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 0] --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/alien.gif ALT="0]"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> E, SL<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :evil --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/devil.gif ALT=":evil"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> PSH<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :evil --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/devil.gif ALT=":evil"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :evil --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/devil.gif ALT=":evil"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> TER.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>(...a legend in his <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/nerd.gif ALT="8o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> wn mind...)</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... shooter</A> at: 10/11/05 2:20 am<br></i>
packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Coast to Coast

Post by packerboy »

Precisely. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
RLStars
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Re: Coast to Coast

Post by RLStars »

Your right on about the "Who's gonna win" senario, but its reather funny watching what the armored guy does when even the slightest contact is made. You would think that they were just run over by a Mack truck. <p></p><i></i>
hawkfan70
Posts: 1316
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:59 am
Location: City of Hockey in Minnesota

in the crease

Post by hawkfan70 »

I doubt that anyone would give up an opportunity to hit a goalie. I think that even a small hit would keep the goalie out of position long enough for many scoring chances. Eventually, they would stay at home in the crease.<br>Is it a penalty now if the goalie plays the puck out of the "trapezoid"? <p></p><i></i>
EREmpireStrikesBack
Posts: 5140
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: in the crease

Post by EREmpireStrikesBack »

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Is it a penalty now if the goalie plays the puck out of the "trapezoid"?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Yes, delay of game I believe <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p>Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls</p><i></i>
ChrisK
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 12:39 am

Re: Trapezoid

Post by ChrisK »

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question, but I thought it was a delay of game if they play it <!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">inside</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--> the trapezoid (the area in the corners) but it's OK to play it outside.<br><br>Hey packerboy, the Wild got a bunch of goals last night! <p></p><i></i>
hawkfan70
Posts: 1316
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:59 am
Location: City of Hockey in Minnesota

Re: Trapezoid

Post by hawkfan70 »

This explains the rule a little better, but does not clarify what type if any penatly is called<br><br>Goaltenders cannot handle the puck behind the goal line, except in a restricted area. <br>The Case: Goalies have too much control in their zone. They play the puck like defensemen, handing it off to teammates, shooting it out, making forward passes. They do so with immunity, protected by goaltender interference rules. Many say the goalie should be declared "fair game" - outside his crease, he should be open to bodychecking and puck battles. But NHL GMs will never increase the injury risk for their most important assets. <br>Impact: The idea is to encourage forechecking. If the goalie can't play a shoot-in, the attackers have a better chance to retrieve the puck. But this rule still allows goalies to play the puck in a zone directly behind the net. The restriction is a minor one and its effect on scoring will likely be negligible. <br>Down Side: Defensemen won't like it, as they count on the goalie to help them win races for the puck. This rule also encourages a dump-and-chase attack, not always the most exciting style of hockey. <br> <p></p><i></i>
EREmpireStrikesBack
Posts: 5140
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: Trapezoid

Post by EREmpireStrikesBack »

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question, but I thought it was a delay of game if they play it inside the trapezoid (the area in the corners) but it's OK to play it outside.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I thought by trapezoid you meant the small area behind the net. The goalies are allowed to play the puck back there, but they can't in the corners without getting a penalty.<br><br>Here is a video that explains the rule:<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://nhl.speedera.net/laceemup/howtop ... ov">Goalie Restrictions Video</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p>Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls</p><i></i>
koren808
Posts: 314
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 11:42 am

Odd Stat

Post by koren808 »

In Minnesota's 3-2 win over St. Louis, only 1 player on the Wild (Brent Burns) had a plus/minus rating above 0. St. Louis had 7, while 7 Wild players had -1 or worse, and 5 Blues players had -1 or worse. That just struck me as very odd.<br><br>Bouchard is really impressing me this year. He is making the new rules work to his advantage big time. Also, Rolston and White look like very good additions to the team. <p>-------------------<br><br>Who is the orca? Who is the octopus? I AM THE WALRUS!</p><i></i>
Post Reply