Who's on your Dream team?

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

mngopher8
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:03 pm

Re: Re:Dream Team Bantam A

Post by mngopher8 »

Slapshot you would seriously take the majority of that list over the better Edina players?Why? <p></p><i></i>
PAMESH
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:34 am

Re: 2nd year bantams playing high school

Post by PAMESH »

Danny Kristo is a 9th grader but not Bantam eligible. He is a Jun b-day. <p></p><i></i>
BamBlingo
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 7:26 pm

Re: 2nd year bantams playing high school

Post by BamBlingo »

to say hicks and seashore would be nothing with out fink is crazy. they are both everyday players and will show up to play night in and night out. I have not seen a better line in the state thus far. <p></p><i></i>
db30
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:28 pm

Re: 2nd year bantams playing high school

Post by db30 »

Who ever said WBL defense is very solid must have not seen them play very many games. Very average besides Putney. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... 30>db30</A> at: 1/16/06 7:45 am<br></i>
TheHockeyGodsWereWithUs
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:21 pm

Re: 2nd year bantams playing high school

Post by TheHockeyGodsWereWithUs »

Bam...<br><br>I hope you really dont think that Hopkins has the best line in the state. They MAY be somewhere in the 6-8 range ONLY because of two words, and those two words are as follows:MIKE FINK. <p></p><i></i>
grizisastud
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 11:26 pm

slapshot

Post by grizisastud »

hockeygodswerwithus had a 10 times better team then yours. <p></p><i></i>
MNLIGHT39
Posts: 384
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:52 pm

Re: Re:Dream Team Bantam A

Post by MNLIGHT39 »

Slapshot-<br><br>Nick Brunette, doesnt be play for Blake Bantam B's?When I saw him he barely even stood out playing against a team that could barely skate... <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... LIGHT39</A> at: 1/15/06 11:44 pm<br></i>
MnHockeyguy06
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:47 pm

Re: Re:Dream Team Bantam A

Post by MnHockeyguy06 »

Seashore and Hicks would be nothing without Fink, thats said and done. There first line does not compare with Edina, Orono, MG, Centenial and White Bear, not even close. Hopkins would be under .500 without Fink. <p></p><i></i>
slapshot 69
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:50 pm

Re: Re:Dream Team Bantam A

Post by slapshot 69 »

MN.GOPHER <br>I did not say they where better just answering the call to name 20 players that can all play. And yes some of them I would take over some of those edina boys. In my opion there are two edina players I think are and will be the real deal. They both have alot of hockey to look forward to in the future. There are alot of very talented hockey players in this state. I am sure someone else could name 20 more. <p></p><i></i>
mnblds88
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 5:02 pm

Re: Re:Dream Team Bantam A

Post by mnblds88 »

Alex Kelly and Michael Bangs???? put down the crack pipe. <p></p><i></i>
topright1577
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:41 pm

Re: Re:Dream Team Bantam A

Post by topright1577 »

what's wrong with alex kelly? <p></p><i></i>
tender33
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: Re:Dream Team Bantam A

Post by tender33 »

why do people say the White bear goalie i better than mike lee from roseau. he's very good but lee is by far the best goalie in the state. <p></p><i></i>
MNLIGHT39
Posts: 384
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:52 pm

Re: Re:Dream Team Bantam A

Post by MNLIGHT39 »

Lee gets scored on he crumbles. Maple Grove put away 9 on him.... <p></p><i></i>
MnHockeyguy06
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:47 pm

Mhm

Post by MnHockeyguy06 »

MG has one of the best offenses in the state though, so the defense might be part of the blame on the goals as well. Dont put all the blame on Lee. <p></p><i></i>
MNLIGHT39
Posts: 384
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:52 pm

Re: Mhm

Post by MNLIGHT39 »

Oh, im not. Agreed with Maple Grove comment and defense comment. Goalies cant do it all themselves, its not possible. Lee is a very very good goalie no doubt. <p></p><i></i>
MnHockeyguy06
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:47 pm

Re: Mhm

Post by MnHockeyguy06 »

Very good golie, thats forshure. <p></p><i></i>
mnhockey22
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:08 pm

Re: Mhm

Post by mnhockey22 »

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Lee gets scored on he crumbles.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I agree you put a couple of quick ones in on him and he loses all his confidence and the game becomes a blowout. <p></p><i></i>
icehockey08
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 6:15 pm

Re: Who's on your Dream team?

Post by icehockey08 »

mnblds88 is not ryan walters i am ryan walters (icehockey0<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
icantstopthepuck
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:47 am

Re: Who's on your Dream team?

Post by icantstopthepuck »

Thats because you just changed your screen name Walters. You have a total of 3 posts <p></p><i></i>
topshelf27
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:04 pm

Re: Who's on your Dream team?

Post by topshelf27 »

In my opinion Mike Lee IS the BEST goalie in the state and if you put a couple away quick on him he doesn't crumble. The problem is that earlier in the season Roseau's scoring ability was below average, but since that whole Maple game Roseau has been on a 22-24 game winning streak (and not against all weak teams either). They have played a couple against Moorhead, DE, Chaska, Elk River, etc. Roseau has gotten better at scoring and might do some damage down at New Hope. <p></p><i></i>
ITS AJ LOL
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:59 pm

OWEN COLLETTE

Post by ITS AJ LOL »

Collette > everyone.<br><br><br>LOL WUT. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START >D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/grin.gif ALT=" >D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Post Reply