What was your most memorable moment of this years tournament

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

HockeyFan1
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: post 10172

Post by HockeyFan1 »

PuckTime wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
boblee wrote: You must not have been sitting by their fans Friday night...

And who could blame them after watching the UNofficiating that took place :roll:
No excuse for classless behavior.


Ah yes, all the other fan sections chanting insults in unison were much more well behaved? Give me a break. :roll:

Let's see - cross checks from behind at the end of a period, taking forever reviewing a goal - then making the wrong signal........and eventually waving it off....more rough / "cheap" shots? Not saying it gives a right to be unclassy, but you can see where it may have come from!
hm88
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:18 pm

Re: post 10172

Post by hm88 »

HockeyFan1 wrote:
PuckTime wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
And who could blame them after watching the UNofficiating that took place :roll:
No excuse for classless behavior.


Ah yes, all the other fan sections chanting insults in unison were much more well behaved? Give me a break. :roll:

Let's see - cross checks from behind at the end of a period, taking forever reviewing a goal - then making the wrong signal........and eventually waving it off....more rough / "cheap" shots? Not saying it gives a right to be unclassy, but you can see where it may have come from!
Um he actually did make the right signal "hockeyfan" he pointed to the faceoff dot, maybe he should have waved it off first but technically it was the right signal. Hockey is a rough game, but you should know that "hockeyfan" and as for cheap shots yes we had a few but you cannot say the cheap shots were completely onesided.
SB24
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 9:36 pm

Post by SB24 »

Give me a break "hockeyfan"- The xcheck you are referring to was a real fine dive by Ness, you could see it on all the replays, clear as day. Roso is a northern team and now you're going to complain that a cities team was playing too rough? Now i've heard it all!
RIP suzy 12.10.2006 - 2.27.2008
EREmpireStrikesBack
Posts: 5140
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Minnesota

Post by EREmpireStrikesBack »

The "grab" after Hill-Murray's third goal in the state tourney.

:idea:
Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls
dherman8
Posts: 863
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:45 pm

Post by dherman8 »

SB24 wrote:Give me a break "hockeyfan"- The xcheck you are referring to was a real fine dive by Ness, you could see it on all the replays, clear as day. Roso is a northern team and now you're going to complain that a cities team was playing too rough? Now i've heard it all!
Is this the one where the horn blew and he had his back to the guy and the guy pushed him. If your not ready for it you're going to fall and I don't think you can take a dive on something you don't see coming.
SB24
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 9:36 pm

Post by SB24 »

oh he saw it coming, he turned his back as he saw the kid coming for him. Soon as he felt something touch his back, down he went... :lol:
RIP suzy 12.10.2006 - 2.27.2008
dherman8
Posts: 863
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:45 pm

Post by dherman8 »

SB24 wrote:oh he saw it coming, he turned his back as he saw the kid coming for him. Soon as he felt something touch his back, down he went... :lol:
Show me the turning of the head. Even if he saw him coming who in their right mind would think someone would be DUMB enough to do that after the whistle? You and your idiotic thoeries. :roll: :roll:
SB24
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 9:36 pm

Post by SB24 »

what?! a hit after the whistle in high school hockey? say it aint so !!!!

what is with you roso people these days, can't you see when someone is just trying to get you going?

Obviously Ness is a great high school player, no argument there from anyone, you guys are just a bit too touchy with him. :wink:
RIP suzy 12.10.2006 - 2.27.2008
dherman8
Posts: 863
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:45 pm

Post by dherman8 »

SB24 wrote:what?! a hit after the whistle in high school hockey? say it aint so !!!!

what is with you roso people these days, can't you see when someone is just trying to get you going?

Obviously Ness is a great high school player, no argument there from anyone, you guys are just a bit too touchy with him. :wink:
I'm not from Roseau but i'm mad at them and Aaron Ness for playing poorly and losing. I think it has shown I hate privates and city schools but HM was a bit dirty in that game. I don't blame that for the outcome and don't want to make a huge deal about it. I won't congratulate HM even though they played good last week.....that's just the way I am.
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Post by Sparlimb »

dherman8 wrote:
SB24 wrote:what?! a hit after the whistle in high school hockey? say it aint so !!!!

what is with you roso people these days, can't you see when someone is just trying to get you going?

Obviously Ness is a great high school player, no argument there from anyone, you guys are just a bit too touchy with him. :wink:
I'm not from Roseau but i'm mad at them and Aaron Ness for playing poorly and losing. I think it has shown I hate privates and city schools but HM was a bit dirty in that game. I don't blame that for the outcome and don't want to make a huge deal about it. I won't congratulate HM even though they played good last week.....that's just the way I am.

I don't think I'd agree that Roseau played that poorly. Hill-Murray just had their game of the season that night. They are normally a finesse team, so the game they played wasn't their normal game and yet it worked perfectly. Roseau was defending champs, so they have nothing to be ashamed of. I don't think they would have beaten Edina either, but we'll never know. Somehow I think it will be Edina's tournament to lose next year.
HockeyFan1
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: post 10172

Post by HockeyFan1 »

hm88 wrote:
HockeyFan1 wrote:
PuckTime wrote: No excuse for classless behavior.


Ah yes, all the other fan sections chanting insults in unison were much more well behaved? Give me a break. :roll:

Let's see - cross checks from behind at the end of a period, taking forever reviewing a goal - then making the wrong signal........and eventually waving it off....more rough / "cheap" shots? Not saying it gives a right to be unclassy, but you can see where it may have come from!
Um he actually did make the right signal "hockeyfan" he pointed to the faceoff dot, maybe he should have waved it off first but technically it was the right signal. Hockey is a rough game, but you should know that "hockeyfan" and as for cheap shots yes we had a few but you cannot say the cheap shots were completely onesided.
I'm not going to sit and argue with you - I know what I saw. If you read my post, I said those are some of the reasons Roseau fans may have been upset. I know what the refs call was, and I also know the "cheap shots" you are referring to, mostly were retalitory.

Congrats to Hill - they played the game plan they needed to play against Roseau, and Edina.
Goldy Gopher
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Post by Goldy Gopher »

dherman8 wrote:
SB24 wrote:what?! a hit after the whistle in high school hockey? say it aint so !!!!

what is with you roso people these days, can't you see when someone is just trying to get you going?

Obviously Ness is a great high school player, no argument there from anyone, you guys are just a bit too touchy with him. :wink:
I'm not from Roseau but i'm mad at them and Aaron Ness for playing poorly and losing. I think it has shown I hate privates and city schools but HM was a bit dirty in that game. I don't blame that for the outcome and don't want to make a huge deal about it. I won't congratulate HM even though they played good last week.....that's just the way I am.
How can you be mad at a Aaron Ness? He's a 18 year old kid and I'm sure he did the best he could. Disappointed? Acceptable. Mad? Not.
The U invented swagger.
SB24
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 9:36 pm

Re: Hill 3 - Roseau 2

Post by SB24 »

SiouxRecruit wrote:
northwoods oldtimer wrote:Waiting around Excel for the Refs to decide if the Roseau goal would stand (tick tok) than to have the Ref signal goal.... the crowd goes nuts. Only to have the Off Ice Official kindly remind the referee that it was disallowed, quite a turn of events to take in live in St. Paul. Not seeing any replay on it at all and not arguing the call it just would have been a hell of a game the last 10 minutes had it gone 3-2. And now will be talked about for years to come as a wild turn of events in our great annual Minnesota tournament.
Ditto....and the HUGE hit in Warroads first game..#22 for Warroad laid a big hit on someone and pretty muched KO'd himself...it was pretty sweet
http://youtube.com/watch?v=t-YfE7Dyoro
RIP suzy 12.10.2006 - 2.27.2008
boblee
Posts: 9146
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Fargo, ND
Contact:

post 10201

Post by boblee »

HockeyFan1 wrote:
PuckTime wrote:
BIAFP wrote:
And who could blame them after watching the UNofficiating that took place :roll:
No excuse for classless behavior.


Ah yes, all the other fan sections chanting insults in unison were much more well behaved? Give me a break. :roll:

Let's see - cross checks from behind at the end of a period, taking forever reviewing a goal - then making the wrong signal........and eventually waving it off....more rough / "cheap" shots? Not saying it gives a right to be unclassy, but you can see where it may have come from!
The cross check was given the 2:00 minor it warranted. It was a long review to do. It was tough to tell if the goalie was affected by the clip. That was after they looked to see if it was kicked. Yes, the ref made the right signal also. He forgot to wave it off but he made the right signal and the right call. The Rams just didn't know how to deal with the extreme physical play of Hill-Murray.
HockeyFan1
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: post 10201

Post by HockeyFan1 »

boblee wrote:
HockeyFan1 wrote:
PuckTime wrote: No excuse for classless behavior.


Ah yes, all the other fan sections chanting insults in unison were much more well behaved? Give me a break. :roll:

Let's see - cross checks from behind at the end of a period, taking forever reviewing a goal - then making the wrong signal........and eventually waving it off....more rough / "cheap" shots? Not saying it gives a right to be unclassy, but you can see where it may have come from!
The cross check was given the 2:00 minor it warranted. It was a long review to do. It was tough to tell if the goalie was affected by the clip. That was after they looked to see if it was kicked. Yes, the ref made the right signal also. He forgot to wave it off but he made the right signal and the right call. The Rams just didn't know how to deal with the extreme physical play of Hill-Murray.
dherman8
Posts: 863
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:45 pm

Post by dherman8 »

Goldy Gopher wrote:
dherman8 wrote:
SB24 wrote:what?! a hit after the whistle in high school hockey? say it aint so !!!!

what is with you roso people these days, can't you see when someone is just trying to get you going?

Obviously Ness is a great high school player, no argument there from anyone, you guys are just a bit too touchy with him. :wink:
I'm not from Roseau but i'm mad at them and Aaron Ness for playing poorly and losing. I think it has shown I hate privates and city schools but HM was a bit dirty in that game. I don't blame that for the outcome and don't want to make a huge deal about it. I won't congratulate HM even though they played good last week.....that's just the way I am.
How can you be mad at a Aaron Ness? He's a 18 year old kid and I'm sure he did the best he could. Disappointed? Acceptable. Mad? Not.
Disappointed and mad go hand in hand with me. I love Roseau and I really wanted them to win and see Aaron Ness, Mike Lee, and the boys play good. They got my hopes up with a great game on Thursday so I was more excited. Friday was a let down. I don't like seeing them lose, especially to a city team. So, yes, I was mad. Quite frankly, I don't care if you see it as acceptable or not
dherman8
Posts: 863
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:45 pm

Re: Hill 3 - Roseau 2

Post by dherman8 »

SB24 wrote:
SiouxRecruit wrote:
northwoods oldtimer wrote:Waiting around Excel for the Refs to decide if the Roseau goal would stand (tick tok) than to have the Ref signal goal.... the crowd goes nuts. Only to have the Off Ice Official kindly remind the referee that it was disallowed, quite a turn of events to take in live in St. Paul. Not seeing any replay on it at all and not arguing the call it just would have been a hell of a game the last 10 minutes had it gone 3-2. And now will be talked about for years to come as a wild turn of events in our great annual Minnesota tournament.
Ditto....and the HUGE hit in Warroads first game..#22 for Warroad laid a big hit on someone and pretty muched KO'd himself...it was pretty sweet
http://youtube.com/watch?v=t-YfE7Dyoro
That was the most exciting part of the game. I love how they show it ten times on tv and then toward the end of this video it shows it a dozen more times. Great music. :lol:
Post Reply