Are ya coming back next year?

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

HockeyDad41
Posts: 1238
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:40 pm

Post by HockeyDad41 »

DMom wrote:When I look at the list of 98 teams playing in the Caribou Cup (which it is good to see the success of this tournament) I have to wonder if there are really that many coaches available. Coaches who can actually develop the kids. Than I have to think of the skilled instructors who have been canceling skating camps. They have to, their core group are spending 2,000$ on summer hockey teams and have nothing left to spend on skills camps.

District 2 is offering a fabulous Bantam Camp with great instructors with decades of hockey experience, and it didn't fill on the first day??? http://www.d2hockey.org/page/show/10103 ... t-2-events
There's something wrong here when instructors of this caliber are passed over by local families. And I am not as confident as others that lots of summer ice is good, the quality of instruction can give much more improvement than 200 hours of ice with sub-par instruction.
Great point DMom.

In our case, I don't think that the issue was with the coaches. They were just doing what they were told to do. There were a ton of hours at the rink and most of them were spent on basic skating development. A very small proportion of the time was spent on offensive drills and almost nothing on defensive play. The goalies should probably get a free pass for the development they get during these practices. Again not a reflection of the coaches. They have an itinerary.

I really didn't have a problem with all the time being spent on skating skills either, as I am a "Marathoner" rather than a "Sprinter" when it comes to developmental expectations for my 9 year old. As Muck likes to point out a lot of changes happen with these boys when they hit puberty, so I am just making sure my kids have a great foundation of skating skills right now. I'm not too worried about the rest of it.

My concern is with the organization. The tournament scheduling was atrocious. They took a brand new team with new coaches and decided to play in two invite level tournaments. In order to even compete in them we had to have a couple of orange guest players play on our team. We should have played in the open level of the International and Easton Cups. The kids would have been more competitive and maybe won some games on their own, and I wouldn't be so crabby.
Solving all of hockey's problems since Feb 2009.
old goalie85
Posts: 3696
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm

Post by old goalie85 »

IS THAT A NEW PROGRAM D2 - WBL coach have going? Looks like a good deal for 400.00. Kind of cool to skate with some of the other Bantams from around d2 before season. Hows it going to work out with football?
Exnorthstar
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:40 pm

next year?

Post by Exnorthstar »

With such a big difference between open and invite levels, coaches need to be accountable for communication and expectations and taking on kids. If a coach takes a kid at the invite level then he needs to suck it up and fully commit to that kid, even if the kid isn't working out as he wished. Or the coach needs to tell the kid he's not cutting it so go to the practice squad. Also at the beginning of the season an invite coach should say, I will sit kids on the bench etc etc...all expectations up front. In our case we were told by the coordinator that this particular coach never benches kids EVER...plays them all fair and square more into development. WHAT A JOKE!
DMom
Posts: 993
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:46 am

Post by DMom »

old goalie85 wrote:IS THAT A NEW PROGRAM D2 - WBL coach have going? Looks like a good deal for 400.00. Kind of cool to skate with some of the other Bantams from around d2 before season. Hows it going to work out with football?
School ball doesn't interfere, but the younger kids who are in traveling football would have a lot of conflicts. 9th graders are usually shifting 100% to school teams.
Post Reply