Section 1A
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
EaglesFan06
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:40 am
-
grafmaster
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:59 pm
- Location: State of Hockey
Tomorrow
Tomorrow should be interesting. The lower seeds with definitly play their hearts out to keep their seasons alive, maybe even making some games out of it!
Puttin' on the foil! Every game! Want some? 
Nothing else. Luverne hasn't beaten any team other than Marshall with a winning record. We all are looking for the one upset but sorry Luverne this won't be it. Top seeds will all win Thursday and Saturday will be very interesting at GACGrizwald wrote:golfreak and hockeystar... why have you picked luverne over new ulm? i havent heard much about luverne except that they have beat marshall but what else?
-
LetsPlayHockey
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:54 am
-
SEMinnHockeyNut
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:01 pm
- Location: Rochester
I like SEMinnHockeyNut's picks. Now to justify the Luverne pick:
1) They have a good goalie who has potential to play great and a goalie can steal a game
2) They are the underdog which should be a motivator
3) New Ulm has had some problems this year putting the puck in the net
I still think that NU wins because they are very good defensively and and have a great goalie (not sure on the name). I don't think that Luverne has the firepower up front to beat NU.
1) They have a good goalie who has potential to play great and a goalie can steal a game
2) They are the underdog which should be a motivator
3) New Ulm has had some problems this year putting the puck in the net
I still think that NU wins because they are very good defensively and and have a great goalie (not sure on the name). I don't think that Luverne has the firepower up front to beat NU.
-
ilovelife23
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:25 pm
-
bigbabyblue
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:01 am
-
pondhockey07
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:57 pm
Albert Lea Update
After one period
AL 1, Waseca 0
Shots were 14-3 AL
AL 1, Waseca 0
Shots were 14-3 AL
-
bigbabyblue
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:01 am
-
minnhockey33
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:59 pm
-
MNHockey75
- Posts: 2144
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 7:12 pm
- Location: Bemidji, MN
-
bigbabyblue
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:01 am
-
minnhockey33
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:59 pm
-
ilovelife23
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:25 pm
west 6
windom 0
20 or so shots for windom but not any good scoring chances. west dominates 5 on 5. they had about 50 or so shots. west advances to play new ulm.
anderson hurt in the beginning of the game and didnt finish...
look's like anderson and campbell are hurt for next game.
windom 0
20 or so shots for windom but not any good scoring chances. west dominates 5 on 5. they had about 50 or so shots. west advances to play new ulm.
anderson hurt in the beginning of the game and didnt finish...
look's like anderson and campbell are hurt for next game.
Last edited by ilovelife23 on Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
[quote="bigbabyblue"][quote="minnhockey33"]Austin: Disallowed goal Second period - In the crease
Austin: Disallowed goal end of game - time expired[/quote]
doesnt surprise me they got 2 disallowed over in Marshall!
ya 3-2 FINAL![/quote]
bigbaby: please be very clear on the following. The refs were not in anyway hired or associated with Marshall. The truth is the high school league is who hires and brings the refs in for section play. To be honest they were about as bad as I've seen. Called off one goal in second period for Austin. It was a two on one break away with the puck sent across the crease. Puck and Austin player arrived in crease at same time. Tough not to condiser this a goal. Second potential goal was a shot that rang all three pipes. I personally didn't think this was a goal but could have been called either way. Third controversial call end of game with fans counting down. Soft shot into net with what appeared to be a goal. Marshall goalie seemed to be listening to fans count-down and quit about 1/2 second early. Fans were counting early.
I've never seen refs hit by more pucks or fall down more than these three refs. It was not a good display of officiating.
Austin: Disallowed goal end of game - time expired[/quote]
doesnt surprise me they got 2 disallowed over in Marshall!
ya 3-2 FINAL![/quote]
bigbaby: please be very clear on the following. The refs were not in anyway hired or associated with Marshall. The truth is the high school league is who hires and brings the refs in for section play. To be honest they were about as bad as I've seen. Called off one goal in second period for Austin. It was a two on one break away with the puck sent across the crease. Puck and Austin player arrived in crease at same time. Tough not to condiser this a goal. Second potential goal was a shot that rang all three pipes. I personally didn't think this was a goal but could have been called either way. Third controversial call end of game with fans counting down. Soft shot into net with what appeared to be a goal. Marshall goalie seemed to be listening to fans count-down and quit about 1/2 second early. Fans were counting early.
I've never seen refs hit by more pucks or fall down more than these three refs. It was not a good display of officiating.