who loses the most to private school transfers?
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:34 pm
who loses the most to private school transfers?
what school loses the most talent to private schools?
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:46 pm
Well within the last couple of years, in my opinion Orono was hit pretty hard by losing:
Taylor Matson- AHA-committed to UofM (Des Moines) I think
Adam Estoclet-BSM-Dartmouth
There are multiple schools that lose alot of good talent, Orono is probly the most recent that I know of.
Please let me know of more schools.
Taylor Matson- AHA-committed to UofM (Des Moines) I think
Adam Estoclet-BSM-Dartmouth
There are multiple schools that lose alot of good talent, Orono is probly the most recent that I know of.
Please let me know of more schools.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:34 pm
im gonna say woodbury. there were 14 players playing in the 2006 state tournament (not last year, 2 years ago) that live in woodbury. woodbury HS did not play in the state tournament that year. notable recent players include tyler zepeda at hill, dan cecka at hill, dom pitera at CDH, mike bangs at cdh, and ben hause at cdh. nick pryor is another one who lived in woodbury but went to hill, but he plays in ann arbor now for the national team
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:39 am
-
- Posts: 861
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:09 pm
Cottage Grove has;
7 @ Hill = Sova, Hill, Meier, Pulanco, Holler and P Johnson who has quit hockey(he might have graduated last year thou) younger Sova will be here also.
3 @ CDH = McClelland, Deflorin and Weyandt (left after peewees)
2 @ STA = Jirele brothers 9th grade jv goalie(soild for bantams last year) and older brother who has quit
3 @ St Bernard's = Hoke brothers and Fornier
Also 3 @ WBL = Putney and Hauswirth bros played up to Bantams then moved.
7 @ Hill = Sova, Hill, Meier, Pulanco, Holler and P Johnson who has quit hockey(he might have graduated last year thou) younger Sova will be here also.
3 @ CDH = McClelland, Deflorin and Weyandt (left after peewees)
2 @ STA = Jirele brothers 9th grade jv goalie(soild for bantams last year) and older brother who has quit
3 @ St Bernard's = Hoke brothers and Fornier
Also 3 @ WBL = Putney and Hauswirth bros played up to Bantams then moved.
You Win - ouchPucknutz69 wrote:Cottage Grove has;
7 @ Hill = Sova, Hill, Meier, Pulanco, Holler and P Johnson who has quit hockey(he might have graduated last year thou) younger Sova will be here also.
3 @ CDH = McClelland, Deflorin and Weyandt (left after peewees)
2 @ STA = Jirele brothers 9th grade jv goalie(soild for bantams last year) and older brother who has quit
3 @ St Bernard's = Hoke brothers and Fornier
Also 3 @ WBL = Putney and Hauswirth bros played up to Bantams then moved.
Peter johnson cant play hockey after his concussion from last yearPucknutz69 wrote:Cottage Grove has;
7 @ Hill = Sova, Hill, Meier, Pulanco, Holler and P Johnson who has quit hockey(he might have graduated last year thou) younger Sova will be here also.
3 @ CDH = McClelland, Deflorin and Weyandt (left after peewees)
2 @ STA = Jirele brothers 9th grade jv goalie(soild for bantams last year) and older brother who has quit
3 @ St Bernard's = Hoke brothers and Fornier
Also 3 @ WBL = Putney and Hauswirth bros played up to Bantams then moved.
-
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:19 pm
-
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:28 am
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
gee whiz, who would have thought of thisHShockeywatcher wrote:Henry Sibley has lots that go to Cretin or St Thomas.
One thing that needs to be remembered is that it's not "losing" the players if they were always private school kids. Lots of kids who are listed went to private schools all their life. They would have done that regardless of where they lived.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
1. There's that, which people can't just assume. If you're going to send your kids to a private school you can live wherever you want.
2. It also happens with public schools. If you live in the Kennedy district, you'll try to OE early to Jefferson to be on a better team, for example. Well, for some with Woodbury, Sibley, Cottage Grove, etc (none of those are hockey powers) so if you live near them, you'll just choose to go somewhere else for hockey.
2. It also happens with public schools. If you live in the Kennedy district, you'll try to OE early to Jefferson to be on a better team, for example. Well, for some with Woodbury, Sibley, Cottage Grove, etc (none of those are hockey powers) so if you live near them, you'll just choose to go somewhere else for hockey.
-
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
- Location: East Metro
Hopefully Jay Moser can take the CG program in a differant direction than the former coach and get the association players to stay in the community.Pucknutz69 wrote:Cottage Grove has;
7 @ Hill = Sova, Hill, Meier, Pulanco, Holler and P Johnson who has quit hockey(he might have graduated last year thou) younger Sova will be here also.
3 @ CDH = McClelland, Deflorin and Weyandt (left after peewees)
2 @ STA = Jirele brothers 9th grade jv goalie(soild for bantams last year) and older brother who has quit
3 @ St Bernard's = Hoke brothers and Fornier
Also 3 @ WBL = Putney and Hauswirth bros played up to Bantams then moved.
Besides, W.B.L. is a public school.Pucknutz69 wrote:Cottage Grove has;
7 @ Hill = Sova, Hill, Meier, Pulanco, Holler and P Johnson who has quit hockey(he might have graduated last year thou) younger Sova will be here also.
3 @ CDH = McClelland, Deflorin and Weyandt (left after peewees)
2 @ STA = Jirele brothers 9th grade jv goalie(soild for bantams last year) and older brother who has quit
3 @ St Bernard's = Hoke brothers and Fornier
Also 3 @ WBL = Putney and Hauswirth bros played up to Bantams then moved.
There's a difference between moving and transferring.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:45 am
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:55 pm
I think you can only use the word "transfer" if they switched AFTER they first attended the public high school.
Maybe the initial question should have been written like this:
How many youth associations which are feeder programs (but can't say that they are feeder programs) had kids (which they don't own, but think they own) go to schools other than the local high school?
I don't know what the solution is other than to start a new youth association and call it "The anyone who is considering attending a private school must play here Youth Hockey Association" If they did this, then there would be complaints from the neighboring youth associations that this team would be stacked. And where would you start......at mini mites? It sure sounds silly and besides....think of all the opportunities which have opened up to other kids because this small group chooses to attend a different school.
Maybe the initial question should have been written like this:
How many youth associations which are feeder programs (but can't say that they are feeder programs) had kids (which they don't own, but think they own) go to schools other than the local high school?
I don't know what the solution is other than to start a new youth association and call it "The anyone who is considering attending a private school must play here Youth Hockey Association" If they did this, then there would be complaints from the neighboring youth associations that this team would be stacked. And where would you start......at mini mites? It sure sounds silly and besides....think of all the opportunities which have opened up to other kids because this small group chooses to attend a different school.
-
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:26 pm
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:01 pm
charliedog wrote
Everyone would be happy if the privates would go back to the independent state championship pre '75 then they can "stack" all they want. There would be no complaints of who owns what kid from what feeder school. Hill could claim all the central catholic conference championships they can handle
It might keep more kids at home however which also keeps the public school
teams happy
End of the private vs public debate
this team would be stacked.
Everyone would be happy if the privates would go back to the independent state championship pre '75 then they can "stack" all they want. There would be no complaints of who owns what kid from what feeder school. Hill could claim all the central catholic conference championships they can handle
It might keep more kids at home however which also keeps the public school
teams happy
End of the private vs public debate
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:55 pm