Park Rapids barking too loud?

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:58 pm

Are PR fans still barking too loud?...id like to know what people think if they WATCHED the game....??....Im taking a wild guess PR needs to beat TRF AND warroad before we can make any noise?...hopefully Im wrong....

I saw a better Park Rapids team come out on top. Although Christianson wasn't in net I still feel PR would have won. It should have been over after 3 anyhow......

SB24 · Post by **SB24** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:20 am

Just like the 5-3 win was a blow out right? Yes, you are barking too loud. You beat EGF without Christensen...congrats. If you are asking for serious responses i would say yes, of course you are over hyping this team...but hey, it gives me entertainment at least.

warriors07 · Post by **warriors07** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:28 am

I would love to see pr come out of this section.

but, this win doesnt mean anything right now, they need to take care of alot of business down the road.

Pr has beaten egf a few times the last few years in the regular season and then egf beat them in sections.

I do think PR is the better team, but they need to prove it down the stretch

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:02 am

warriors07 wrote:I would love to see pr come out of this section.

but, this win doesnt mean anything right now, they need to take care of alot of business down the road.

Pr has beaten egf a few times the last few years in the regular season and then egf beat them in sections.

I do think PR is the better team, but they need to prove it down the stretch

well said...they have ALOT ahead of them....I hope PR keeps winning....on the other hand..MINUS the goalies PR looked like a better team....but SB did u go to the game?...and im not the only one barking....

...

I do agree it is early...and yes I did want a serious response...so thanks SB

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:04 am

warriors07 wrote:I would love to see pr come out of this section.

but, this win doesnt mean anything right now, they need to take care of alot of business down the road.

Pr has beaten egf a few times the last few years in the regular season and then egf beat them in sections.

I do think PR is the better team, but they need to prove it down the stretch

and one more thing...I think this game did and does mean something right now for Park....tonights game could have been a spark to a big fire....but yes they have a lot more tests down the road and good luck to them from PR fans....and yours truely Siouxrecruit...but who besides ChristainsON was missing?...5 players?

schwang17 · Post by **schwang17** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:58 am

When/if we get out of Section 8 then we can start barking. Until then, anything and everything is pretty much worthless. If you want my honest opinion, there is a bit too much hype here...

SB24 · Post by **SB24** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:43 am

a bit of reality from Schwang, refreshing. No, i wasn't at the game last night, Warroad played Hibbing but do you honestly believe you beat the real EGF team last night? didn't think so.

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:47 pm

SB24 wrote:a bit of reality from Schwang, refreshing. No, i wasn't at the game last night, Warroad played Hibbing but do you honestly believe you beat the real EGF team last night? didn't think so.

They sure didn't look fake

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:51 pm

No excuses - a win is a win.
Good job PR.
Sounded like Zach Knapp had a real good game.

1. Warroad

2. Park Rapids
2.5 East Grand Forks

warriors07 · Post by **warriors07** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:55 pm

SB24 wrote:a bit of reality from Schwang, refreshing. No, i wasn't at the game last night, Warroad played Hibbing but do you honestly believe you beat the real EGF team last night? didn't think so.

hey sb24, you picked pr to win anyways, whats ur deal

mnhockey07 · Post by **mnhockey07** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:36 am

Does Zach Luerke have any college offers? I watched him at the nikebauer invite this fall and came away pretty impressed. He was fast, slippery in the corners, good hands, nice shot. Just wondering what others think about him?

Irishmans Shanty · Post by **Irishmans Shanty** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:54 am

mnhockey07 wrote: Just wondering what others think about him?

Just do a little reading in 8A threads, a simple discussion about Hallock's concession stand or TRF's jerseys seems to end up as a discussion about PR.

Warrior18 · Post by **Warrior18** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:01 am

This win means absolutely nothing. EGF was missing yes 5 players and there best player there goalie.

MISSING PLAYERS

1. Christiason Starting G
2. Casey Wood 2nd line D
3. Nick Ohman 1st line D
4. John Peterson 3rd line D
5. Brandon Peabody 2nd line D left after 2nd peroid after the cheap shot from behind.
6. Cody Grassel. 3rd line D

7. Kody Viznor left after 2nd peroid. Best D-Man. 1st line.

So basically they beat half the EGF team. 2 of there forward were playing Defense. So to say there the better team is a joke. a 6-5 win in OT. Wait till sections.

newsguy35 · Post by **newsguy35** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:38 am

Warrior18 wrote:This win means absolutely nothing. EGF was missing yes 5 players and there best player there goalie.

MISSING PLAYERS

1. Christiason Starting G
2. Casey Wood 2nd line D
3. Nick Ohman 1st line D
4. John Peterson 3rd line D
5. Brandon Peabody 2nd line D left after 2nd peroid after the cheap shot from behind.
6. Cody Grassel. 3rd line D

7. Kody Viznor left after 2nd peroid. Best D-Man. 1st line.

So basically they beat half the EGF team. 2 of there forward were playing Defense. So to say there the better team is a joke. a 6-5 win in OT. Wait till sections.

I disagree again... The win means they could get a better seed in the section tournament. Also, it doesnt matter who wasnt dressed, the scoreboard is what matters. Yes, they had players missing but at the same time EGF couldnt pull it out. For now it is legit to say that PR is the better team, but as you pointed out "wait till sections."

SB24 · Post by **SB24** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:12 pm

newsguy35 wrote:
Warrior18 wrote:This win means absolutely nothing. EGF was missing yes 5 players and there best player there goalie.

MISSING PLAYERS

1. Christiason Starting G
2. Casey Wood 2nd line D
3. Nick Ohman 1st line D
4. John Peterson 3rd line D
5. Brandon Peabody 2nd line D left after 2nd peroid after the cheap shot from behind.
6. Cody Grassel. 3rd line D

7. Kody Viznor left after 2nd peroid. Best D-Man. 1st line.

So basically they beat half the EGF team. 2 of there forward were playing Defense. So to say there the better team is a joke. a 6-5 win in OT. Wait till sections.
I disagree again... The win means they could get a better seed in the section tournament. Also, it doesnt matter who wasnt dressed, the scoreboard is what matters. Yes, they had players missing but at the same time EGF couldnt pull it out. For now it is legit to say that PR is the better team, but as you pointed out "wait till sections."

Really? How's that?

TTpuckster · Post by **TTpuckster** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:43 pm

Warrior18 wrote:This win means absolutely nothing. EGF was missing yes 5 players and there best player there goalie.

MISSING PLAYERS

1. Christiason Starting G
2. Casey Wood 2nd line D
3. Nick Ohman 1st line D
4. John Peterson 3rd line D
5. Brandon Peabody 2nd line D left after 2nd peroid after the cheap shot from behind.
6. Cody Grassel. 3rd line D

7. Kody Viznor left after 2nd peroid. Best D-Man. 1st line.

So basically they beat half the EGF team. 2 of there forward were playing Defense. So to say there the better team is a joke. a 6-5 win in OT. Wait till sections.

Wow, if this is true, then I have to disagree with the PR lovers.

Yes, PR gets the win; congrats for that. But, if all of these players were missing for the elves, then, I do not think that anybody can say that one team is better than the other. Certainly, if Lerhke and McMorrow, and the starting goalie were missing for PR, and they lost in overtime, would you be saying that EGF is the better team?

I think not.

It is unfortunate that EGF was missing so many players. Irregardless of the reason for it.

So, as somebody said earlier, we'll see at the sectionals.

sinbombyzermancurve · Post by **sinbombyzermancurve** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:29 pm

SB24 wrote:
newsguy35 wrote:
Warrior18 wrote:This win means absolutely nothing. EGF was missing yes 5 players and there best player there goalie.

MISSING PLAYERS

1. Christiason Starting G
2. Casey Wood 2nd line D
3. Nick Ohman 1st line D
4. John Peterson 3rd line D
5. Brandon Peabody 2nd line D left after 2nd peroid after the cheap shot from behind.
6. Cody Grassel. 3rd line D

7. Kody Viznor left after 2nd peroid. Best D-Man. 1st line.

So basically they beat half the EGF team. 2 of there forward were playing Defense. So to say there the better team is a joke. a 6-5 win in OT. Wait till sections.
I disagree again... The win means they could get a better seed in the section tournament. Also, it doesnt matter who wasnt dressed, the scoreboard is what matters. Yes, they had players missing but at the same time EGF couldnt pull it out. For now it is legit to say that PR is the better team, but as you pointed out "wait till sections."
Really? How's that?

Umm sb24 you picked pr to win, never seen a guy contradict himself as much as you

Undercover Hockey Lover · Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:35 pm

I wouldn't call it barking anyway...remember their just ankle biters... it's more of a yip or a yap than anything.

SiouxRecruit · Post by **SiouxRecruit** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:16 pm

Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:I wouldn't call it barking anyway...remember their just ankle biters... it's more of a yip or a yap than anything.

newsguy35 · Post by **newsguy35** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:48 pm

SB24 wrote:
newsguy35 wrote:
Warrior18 wrote:This win means absolutely nothing. EGF was missing yes 5 players and there best player there goalie.

MISSING PLAYERS

1. Christiason Starting G
2. Casey Wood 2nd line D
3. Nick Ohman 1st line D
4. John Peterson 3rd line D
5. Brandon Peabody 2nd line D left after 2nd peroid after the cheap shot from behind.
6. Cody Grassel. 3rd line D

7. Kody Viznor left after 2nd peroid. Best D-Man. 1st line.

So basically they beat half the EGF team. 2 of there forward were playing Defense. So to say there the better team is a joke. a 6-5 win in OT. Wait till sections.
I disagree again... The win means they could get a better seed in the section tournament. Also, it doesnt matter who wasnt dressed, the scoreboard is what matters. Yes, they had players missing but at the same time EGF couldnt pull it out. For now it is legit to say that PR is the better team, but as you pointed out "wait till sections."
Really? How's that?

I believe the scoreboard is where you need to be looking... I thought it was a PR win... If you lose to that team and have the same record, the tie breaker is head to head. THUS PR is above EGF...

IAMAHOCKEYPLAYER · Post by **IAMAHOCKEYPLAYER** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:37 pm

give me a break, i'm getting sick of EGF blaming the loss on missing players. PR was missing Brandon Mickleson due to injury who was on Lehrke's line against silver bay and got a hat trick. And Bill Winkler got ejected early in the second because of the "cheap hit", which shouldn't have been more than a boarding. EGF wasn't missing any of their studs. A win is a win, get over it. Especially driving 2.5 hrs and beating them in their own barn.

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:52 pm

newsguy35 wrote:
SB24 wrote:
newsguy35 wrote: I disagree again... The win means they could get a better seed in the section tournament. Also, it doesnt matter who wasnt dressed, the scoreboard is what matters. Yes, they had players missing but at the same time EGF couldnt pull it out. For now it is legit to say that PR is the better team, but as you pointed out "wait till sections."
Really? How's that?
I believe the scoreboard is where you need to be looking... I thought it was a PR win... If you lose to that team and have the same record, the tie breaker is head to head. THUS PR is above EGF...

What tie breaker is that?

schwang17 · Post by **schwang17** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:42 pm

elliott70 wrote:What tie breaker is that?

The "we lost and now look at all of our excuses" tie breaker..

Undercover Hockey Lover · Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:04 am

I haven't decided what's more pathetic to read...PR fans gloating about a single win or PR fans over-inflated sense of their team as well as themselves or PR players on here justifying their win or an Elves fan moaning about the loss because of who wasn't playing or PR fans countering with they were missing what is a mediocre forward that plays with their superstar or PR and Elf fans naming themselves Warriors or a Bagleyite on the PR bandwagon spewing half @ssed remarks. Here's what it sounds like in dog speak...yip, yip , yip, yap, yip, yap, yip, yap, yap, yap, yap, yip, yip, yap, yip, yap, yip, yip, yap, yap, yap, yap, yap, yip, yip, yip, yip, yap, yip, yip, yip, yap, yap, yip. Everybody else is sitting back going..

(TRF)

(WAR)

(KC)

(BEM)

(CROX)

(RLF) Get the picture?

greatone · Post by **greatone** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:13 am

UHL-
For downgrading everyone else on commenting on the topic, you sure are pretty quick to reply to EVERYONES posts. As for the post itself... It is a W in the win column no matter who didn't play for EITHER team.