Jake Gardiner
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:19 pm
Re: Jake Gardiner
After seeing him play twice, I'm a believer too. This kid can GO.
-
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:55 pm
-
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:33 am
- Location: In the box
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:17 pm
After watching him this fall he reminds me a lot of Paul Martin, same build and frame, same type of playing styles. A very good skater, i will predict he will be the highest Minnesotan drafted. the reason i say this is he is the tallest of the top d-men and could still fill out and as mentioned a very very good skater.
-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:15 pm
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:01 pm
wasn't good, or even noticed until daddy switched him to D, but what a great move for Jake. his hockey life turned arounds instantly in the eyes of scouts maybe Lucia saw him too much as a foward and didn't watch him as a D before he was snatched away by the badgers, or maybe he doesn't want another Erik Johnson leaving after one season of playGinosAreGood wrote:i watched a few of his elite league games this fall and in my opinion was one of the best defenders on the ice every game. i was very impressed with this guy. He'll be very successful wherever he goes
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
The main thing being there was no roster opportunity to recruit him for as the Gophers only lose one d-man to graduation after this year (Peltier) and already had defense commitments from Ness, Lofquist and Grant Scott for next year (although Scott's position has yet to be determined as he can play forward or defense). Given Gardiner's draft stock was likely to make him a college player in 2008, it wasn't a good match.ColdasIce wrote:maybe Lucia saw him too much as a foward and didn't watch him as a D before he was snatched away by the badgers, or maybe he doesn't want another Erik Johnson leaving after one season of play
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:12 pm
- Location: Burnsville
as good as he is...you find a spot for himGopher Blog wrote:The main thing being there was no roster opportunity to recruit him for as the Gophers only lose one d-man to graduation after this year (Peltier) and already had defense commitments from Ness, Lofquist and Grant Scott for next year (although Scott's position has yet to be determined as he can play forward or defense). Given Gardiner's draft stock was likely to make him a college player in 2008, it wasn't a good match.ColdasIce wrote:maybe Lucia saw him too much as a foward and didn't watch him as a D before he was snatched away by the badgers, or maybe he doesn't want another Erik Johnson leaving after one season of play
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
Your comment may be valid if we are talking about pro baseball where funds to spend on players is unlimited for some top teams. But it is different in college hockey where you only have 18 scholarships to work with in building a team. Once you allocated your scholarships for certain spots on the team, there isn't much more you can do. You can't manufacture more scholarships just so you can add another good player.CrossbarandIn99 wrote:as good as he is...you find a spot for him
-
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:12 pm
- Location: Burnsville
Good point, can they borrow one from next years batch ?Gopher Blog wrote:Your comment may be valid if we are talking about pro baseball where funds to spend on players is unlimited for some top teams. But it is different in college hockey where you only have 18 scholarships to work with in building a team. Once you allocated your scholarships for certain spots on the team, there isn't much more you can do. You can't manufacture more scholarships just so you can add another good player.CrossbarandIn99 wrote:as good as he is...you find a spot for him

ColdasIce is correct in a lot of ways. Jake was a good, not great forward. His switch from forward to D was an outstanding move. From the D position he has done very well. GB brings up good points. # of scholarships available at the time played a big part the recruiting picture. On top of that, the jury was out on Jake as a D man. Obviously his stock as a player has grown tremendously. His rise to the Advance 18 team put him on the radar screen as a D man. Jake still needs to understand the position better. He tends to run around and is sometimes too focused on the offensive side of things. Wisconsin's style will bring that around.CrossbarandIn99 wrote:as good as he is...you find a spot for himGopher Blog wrote:The main thing being there was no roster opportunity to recruit him for as the Gophers only lose one d-man to graduation after this year (Peltier) and already had defense commitments from Ness, Lofquist and Grant Scott for next year (although Scott's position has yet to be determined as he can play forward or defense). Given Gardiner's draft stock was likely to make him a college player in 2008, it wasn't a good match.ColdasIce wrote:maybe Lucia saw him too much as a foward and didn't watch him as a D before he was snatched away by the badgers, or maybe he doesn't want another Erik Johnson leaving after one season of play
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
Gopher Blog wrote:By the time he leaves that program, any ounce of offense knack he has will have been drilled out of him by Eaves..... If I didn't know any better, I'd think Eaves doesn't like when guys score goals.breakout wrote:Wisconsin's style will bring that around.
Ya, interesting selection in schools for his high school style of play.
UW-20 games played, 60 goals scored.Gopher Blog wrote:By the time he leaves that program, any ounce of offense knack he has will have been drilled out of him by Eaves..... If I didn't know any better, I'd think Eaves doesn't like when guys score goals.breakout wrote:Wisconsin's style will bring that around.
UM-22 games played, 61 goals scored.


-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:29 pm
Or we don't really know what the "main" thing was - maybe he didn't want to play for the Gophers.Gopher Blog wrote:The main thing being there was no roster opportunity to recruit him for as the Gophers only lose one d-man to graduation after this year (Peltier) and already had defense commitments from Ness, Lofquist and Grant Scott for next year (although Scott's position has yet to be determined as he can play forward or defense). Given Gardiner's draft stock was likely to make him a college player in 2008, it wasn't a good match.ColdasIce wrote:maybe Lucia saw him too much as a foward and didn't watch him as a D before he was snatched away by the badgers, or maybe he doesn't want another Erik Johnson leaving after one season of play
Predictable -a high end player that doesn't come to UM because there was no room for him.
Gardiner was considered a 2009 recruit before his stock went up so the claim that there wasn't any room holds no water.stickboy1956 wrote:Or we don't really know what the "main" thing was - maybe he didn't want to play for the Gophers.Gopher Blog wrote:The main thing being there was no roster opportunity to recruit him for as the Gophers only lose one d-man to graduation after this year (Peltier) and already had defense commitments from Ness, Lofquist and Grant Scott for next year (although Scott's position has yet to be determined as he can play forward or defense). Given Gardiner's draft stock was likely to make him a college player in 2008, it wasn't a good match.ColdasIce wrote:maybe Lucia saw him too much as a foward and didn't watch him as a D before he was snatched away by the badgers, or maybe he doesn't want another Erik Johnson leaving after one season of play
Predictable -a high end player that doesn't come to UM because there was no room for him.
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
As I educate myself more and more on recruiting, I'm starting to find out that straight forward recruiting battles are extremely rare. The school that any particular player ends up at is almost ALWAYS a matter of situation, as it was in Gardiner's case.
That being said, the Gophers have won their share of true battles (ie; Schmidt). They've also lost a few (ie; Mattson, Fink).
As an SCSU fan, it's a reality to face that the Huskies won't win many battles straight up, so they have to maximize their situational opportunities when the come up (Mike Lee, Nick Oliver, LeBlanc, Marvin, etc). None of those guys were a straight up victory, but there's no doubt that any one of them would have been welcome at a UMN and/or UW and/or UND if the situation was right. I didn't include Festler or Hanowski in that group because their local ties gave SCSU an advantage.
That being said, the Gophers have won their share of true battles (ie; Schmidt). They've also lost a few (ie; Mattson, Fink).
As an SCSU fan, it's a reality to face that the Huskies won't win many battles straight up, so they have to maximize their situational opportunities when the come up (Mike Lee, Nick Oliver, LeBlanc, Marvin, etc). None of those guys were a straight up victory, but there's no doubt that any one of them would have been welcome at a UMN and/or UW and/or UND if the situation was right. I didn't include Festler or Hanowski in that group because their local ties gave SCSU an advantage.
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
Nobody said he was unworthy. I could understand your whining if that had been said. I know you are poor with facts but let's point out something so you can get it.stickboy1956 wrote:Predictable -a high end player that doesn't come to UM because there was no room for him.
Gardiner committed at a time (June) when the Gophers projected this group for 2008:
RJ
Fischer
Shack
O'Brien
Wehrs
Fairchild
Bickel
Lofquist
Ness
The above doesn't even list Grant Scott as he could play either forward or defense in college. Of that group at the time, they did not expect to lose much for 2009 (other than RJ to graduation and maybe David Fischer and/or O'Brien to the pros). That would have left them with them with seven to eight defensemen returning and two already recruited for 2009 (Helgeson and Martell). In other words at that time, they already had nine d-men scheduled for 2008 and projected at least nine d-men for 2009. Most teams carry eight to nine defensemen on their roster in college. Maybe you aren't very good with numbers but do you see the room?

Of course, O'Brien left unexpectedly late in the summer so that opened a potential spot for 2009/2010. Nick Leddy gets recruited as a 2009 or 2010 guy.
Look around college hockey and you'll see it is rare for teams to carry more than eight or nine d-men on their roster.
Try taking a look at projected rosters some time and then open your mouth. You'll look far less ignorant than you usually do.
