Personally, I think they are a bit off (putting it kindly). I don't think minnesota-scores.net is a hockey site, it's good for scores, but leave the rankings to the professional like PS2.
So, in summery PS2 wins.
PS2 vs. QRF
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
PS2 vs. QRF
Anybody see the QRF rankings on minnesota-scores.net
Personally, I think they are a bit off (putting it kindly). I don't think minnesota-scores.net is a hockey site, it's good for scores, but leave the rankings to the professional like PS2.
So, in summery PS2 wins.
Personally, I think they are a bit off (putting it kindly). I don't think minnesota-scores.net is a hockey site, it's good for scores, but leave the rankings to the professional like PS2.
So, in summery PS2 wins.
-
Can't Never Tried
- Posts: 4345
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm
-
Neutron 14
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
Hey, listen... I have made it to the 2nd of the 5 Stages of Grief. Cut me some slack.Neutron 14 wrote:Somebody is bitter about something......Govs93 wrote:
So what you're saying is that there's virtually no difference?
-
Can't Never Tried
- Posts: 4345
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm
Would'nt have anything to do with this now would it????Neutron 14 wrote:Somebody is bitter about something......Govs93 wrote:
So what you're saying is that there's virtually no difference?
Last edited by Can't Never Tried on Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
O-townClown
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
- Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town
-
Indians forever
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
- Location: St. Cloud MN
-
PuckRanger
- Posts: 1829
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:15 am
- Location: Iron Range
- Contact:
That's why they play them on the ice and not on paper! Thats also why they are called "rankings" and not "results".Indians forever wrote:Rankings are nothing, all that matters is who wins the big Dance come March.
If you took 100 "experts" and sat them down individually and had them rank the top 20 in each class, I bet you would get 100 different results, with none duplicating either the QRF of the PS2 system. Everyone has different perceptions and reasoning methods.
-
HShockeywatcher
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
The PS2 uses the previous season's results and therefore always has a number for each team. Then that number and the number of the opponent is used, along with the outcome of the game.
With the QRF, it just uses classes. Beating Moorhead 7-2 is the same as beating North St Paul 7-2.
By the end of the season, both are generally right on.
Just like the BCS, NBA power rankings, etc, nothing is perfect. They all use their own criteria and are all "right" for what they use.
With the QRF, it just uses classes. Beating Moorhead 7-2 is the same as beating North St Paul 7-2.
By the end of the season, both are generally right on.
Just like the BCS, NBA power rankings, etc, nothing is perfect. They all use their own criteria and are all "right" for what they use.
-
EREmpireStrikesBack
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
- Location: Minnesota
HShockeywatcher wrote:The PS2 uses the previous season's results and therefore always has a number for each team. Then that number and the number of the opponent is used, along with the outcome of the game.
With the QRF, it just uses classes. Beating Moorhead 7-2 is the same as beating North St Paul 7-2.
By the end of the season, both are generally right on.
Just like the BCS, NBA power rankings, etc, nothing is perfect. They all use their own criteria and are all "right" for what they use.
Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls
-
EREmpireStrikesBack
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
- Location: Minnesota
Re: post 9494
So does that mean that a manly man like you can't use it?boblee wrote:QRF works very good for the girls I know.
Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls
post 9495
I should rephrase that. The girls HS hockey QRF rankings are very accurate.EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:So does that mean that a manly man like you can't use it?boblee wrote:QRF works very good for the girls I know.
-
HShockeywatcher
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
Neutron 14
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
Re: uh oh
Perfect Hawk!hawkfan70 wrote:HShockeywatcher wrote:Still wondering what I "have got" wrong...
The only soft spot I see is the one between my legs
-
EREmpireStrikesBack
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
- Location: Minnesota
Re: uh oh
Man I've missed him...Neutron 14 wrote:Perfect Hawk!hawkfan70 wrote:HShockeywatcher wrote:Still wondering what I "have got" wrong...
Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls
-
HShockeywatcher
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
EREmpireStrikesBack
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
- Location: Minnesota
-
HShockeywatcher
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Really? Well I'm worth enough that you'd reply to my message at 8:15 on a Friday night.
While you were "not wasting your time on me" responding in this thread three times and responding to my PMs saying you're not going to waste your time responding to me you could have spent less time on one response explaining yourself...
While you were "not wasting your time on me" responding in this thread three times and responding to my PMs saying you're not going to waste your time responding to me you could have spent less time on one response explaining yourself...
-
EREmpireStrikesBack
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:28 am
- Location: Minnesota
Damn. You got me there. What was the topic again? You are really good at getting off of it...HShockeywatcher wrote:Really? Well I'm worth enough that you'd reply to my message at 8:15 on a Friday night.
While you were "not wasting your time on me" responding in this thread three times and responding to my PMs saying you're not going to waste your time responding to me you could have spent less time on one response explaining yourself...
Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls
you 2 need to get a roomEREmpireStrikesBack wrote:Damn. You got me there. What was the topic again? You are really good at getting off...HShockeywatcher wrote:Really? Well I'm worth enough that you'd reply to my message at 8:15 on a Friday night.
While you were "not wasting your time on me" responding in this thread three times and responding to my PMS saying you're not going to waste your time responding to me you could have spent less time on one response explaining yourself...
-
Can't Never Tried
- Posts: 4345
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm
No........ one of em just needs to go >>hawkfan70 wrote:you 2 need to get a roomEREmpireStrikesBack wrote:Damn. You got me there. What was the topic again? You are really good at getting off...HShockeywatcher wrote:Really? Well I'm worth enough that you'd reply to my message at 8:15 on a Friday night.
While you were "not wasting your time on me" responding in this thread three times and responding to my PMS saying you're not going to waste your time responding to me you could have spent less time on one response explaining yourself...
