Lakeville North @ Burnsville JAN 19

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply

Who takes it?

North
4
44%
Hendo and Barnes
5
56%
 
Total votes: 9

pioneerhockey12
Posts: 145
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:13 pm

Lakeville North @ Burnsville JAN 19

Post by pioneerhockey12 »

what are your thoughts on todays game. Last matchup burnsville won 3 to 1 with no points from hendrickson or barnes. Can north shut them down agagin? And rumor is that burnsville's number 3 goalie will be in the nets for senior day.
STEV16
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:44 pm
Location: On The Pond

Post by STEV16 »

I think Lake north is capable of winning this game, as well as winning any game in the lake. Burnsville should be fired up with senior night, and if #3 is a senior he should start. With this said, Lake north will have to play a very solid game and be very physical against a quick bville team if they want to win, but Bville at home and being a good team im taking them.

Bville-4
Lake North-2
tjkhavgam
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:15 pm

Post by tjkhavgam »

yes the # 3 goalie is a senior and i think being senior night and all, burnsville will come out flying with a 6-2 win
Indians forever
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: St. Cloud MN

Post by Indians forever »

The Braves win easily in this one!!!! 7-2
koho snipe
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:36 am

Post by koho snipe »

so number 3 goalie is benedict? right? or becker? Lakeville has a chance as always, but benedict is having a nice year.
Burnsville-7
LKN-4
STEV16
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:44 pm
Location: On The Pond

Post by STEV16 »

BVille up 2-0

start of 2nd
SECHockeyFan
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm

Post by SECHockeyFan »

Who's in net?
koho snipe
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:36 am

Post by koho snipe »

Burnsville wins 8-0
#21 was in net for the first 6 and the other vars goalie for the last two.
Benedict shut out for burnsville
Post Reply