FINAL MN HOCKEY RANKINGS "BNT A"

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
oldtimer64
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:15 am

FINAL MN HOCKEY RANKINGS "BNT A"

Post by oldtimer64 »

Here are the 2007-2008 final Bantam A rankings.


1 Eden Prairie Eagles A 62-4-2 17.17 4.22 12.95
2 Wayzata Trojans A 39-11-1 15.58 2.39 13.19
3 St Cloud Huskies A 39-9-2 15.57 3.52 12.05
4 Duluth East A 37-13-1 15.47 2.37 13.10
5 Edina Hornets A 43-16-5 15.12 2.15 12.97
6 Champlin Park Rebels A 31-11-0 14.91 3.02 11.89
7 Moorhead Spuds A 42-4-1 14.58 4.00 10.58
8 Minnetonka Skippers A 33-13-3 14.17 1.73 12.44
9 Burnsville Blaze A 37-12-4 14.16 2.05 12.11
10 Maple Grove Crimson A 29-13-3 13.85 1.55 12.30
11 Centennial Cougars A 29-28-3 13.66 0.18 13.48
12 Stillwater Stallions A 35-12-9 13.45 1.69 11.76
13 Rochester (1) Red A 24-13-3 13.42 1.62 11.80
14 Roseville Raiders A 40-18-2 13.39 2.10 11.29
15 White Bear Lake Bears A 33-28-8 13.37 0.40 12.97
16 Grand Rapids Thunderhawks A 30-13-0 13.36 2.04 11.32
17 Bloomington Jefferson Jaguars A 22-19-3 13.24 0.79 12.45
18 Roseau Rams A 33-16-1 13.19 2.28 10.91
19 Woodbury Royals A 21-15-2 13.09 0.78 12.31
20 Bemidji Lumberjacks A 27-9-1 12.80 2.10 10.70
Chuck Norris Fan
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:01 pm
Location: North Metro
Contact:

B as in B, S as in S

Post by Chuck Norris Fan »

This just proves that stats and numbers mean nothing. You can not rank teams on scores, strength of schedule and wins and losses.

Those numbers are terrible, for example when it really mattered #4 beat #3 that makes them better!! And #11 beat everyone they had to in order to be the runner up in state. This is a foolish way to look at teams, it doesn't take into consideration which goalie played, who was hurt, where the game was played, did they just lock up a district title, did they have a player out on susupension. WHat really matters is who wins when it counts and I hate blowing the same horn over and over again. But it is the same coaches and the same teams in the dance every year, that can not be denied.....so you can take the numbers and well...... be creative
SuperStar
Posts: 1284
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:26 am

Post by SuperStar »

CNF - I have to disagree with you - These rankings are much more accurate than LPH, lets say.

MN Hocking rankings goes by Stregnth of schedule, final score, GA, GF - They take out all emotionally excuses..

Like which goalie played - Like that matters! The kid is a part of the team.

Who was hurt - who wasn't - suspensions, etc. Should another team just not show up and play cause Johhny Superstar is hurt or better yet - He's playing

You are right one thing - what really matters when it comes to rankings is Wins against strong teams and how often you play stronger teams, regardless of who is playing - how bad the refs where and anything else comes to mind. And your rightabout the same teams being in the dance every other year - It's those pesky good associations and coaches that take hockey serious...And please lets not use the SIZE of the program for an excuse - Big or small.
Hockey22
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Post by Hockey22 »

MN Hockey rankings does not have all the games included that were played by all teams, that is what is wrong with their rankings.
BantamAhockey1
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:56 pm

Post by BantamAhockey1 »

rapids and jefferson shouldnt be in there
Post Reply