SEC Next Season

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply

Who will win the SEC in 2008-09?

Cretin-Derham Hall
14
16%
Forest Lake
3
3%
Hastings
8
9%
Mounds View
3
3%
Park
1
1%
Roseville
3
3%
Stillwater
6
7%
White Bear Lake
28
31%
Woodbury
23
26%
 
Total votes: 89

komada77
Posts: 505
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:16 pm

SEC Next Season

Post by komada77 »

Is it just me, or is this conference looking ridiculously weak on paper? The 3 traditional powers in the SEC-Roseville, CDH, and WBL-do not appear to have anything special coming up. The emerging SEC power, Woodbury, is losing a TON of talent from their state tourney team. The rest of the conference-Park, Mounds View, FLake, Hastings, and Stillwater-look like they will be mediocre as usual. Who is going to win this conference?
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
SEC Scotty
Posts: 1037
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
Location: East Metro

Post by SEC Scotty »

White Bear with Wolter, Swanson, Pasma, and Lowell up front. Putney and Gjerde on D, and Collette in goal.

Woodbury and Cretin will be good, as will Stillwater.
formerlybackofnet
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:25 am

Re: SEC Next Season

Post by formerlybackofnet »

komada77 wrote:Is it just me, or is this conference looking ridiculously weak on paper? The 3 traditional powers in the SEC-Roseville, CDH, and WBL-do not appear to have anything special coming up. The emerging SEC power, Woodbury, is losing a TON of talent from their state tourney team. The rest of the conference-Park, Mounds View, FLake, Hastings, and Stillwater-look like they will be mediocre as usual. Who is going to win this conference?
" weak on paper"?, I think they play on ice. Even when the SEC has an average year, it is still one of the toughest conferences.
Daulton911
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:37 pm

Post by Daulton911 »

Woodbury, cretin and WBL on top
Last edited by Daulton911 on Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ROOK EYE
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:33 pm

Post by ROOK EYE »

Who in their right mind would pick Hastings? Must be a glue sniffer.. Hastings won't win 5 games. Welsch couldn't win WITH talent. How in the world do you think he'll get anything out of this collection? I'm not sure they've got enough talent to field a good JV team. The SEC will be bad again this year. Anyone's guess..
gopherhockey1234
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:44 pm

More players leaving Hastings???????

Post by gopherhockey1234 »

The latest rumor in Hastings is that Jon Gleisner there goalie is leaving to go play Junior hockey. Can anyone in Hastings confirm that? If this is the case that team will not win 3 games all year. He is the one bright spot on that team.
major4
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:28 pm

Post by major4 »

Both Cretin and White Bear Lake are strong programs and should be in the running for SEC title
gopherhockey1234
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:44 pm

Post by gopherhockey1234 »

I know for a fact...i am one of gleinser best friends and i know for a fact that he will not be leaving to go play juniors next season
komada77
Posts: 505
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:16 pm

Re: SEC Next Season

Post by komada77 »

formerlybackofnet wrote:
komada77 wrote:Is it just me, or is this conference looking ridiculously weak on paper? The 3 traditional powers in the SEC-Roseville, CDH, and WBL-do not appear to have anything special coming up. The emerging SEC power, Woodbury, is losing a TON of talent from their state tourney team. The rest of the conference-Park, Mounds View, FLake, Hastings, and Stillwater-look like they will be mediocre as usual. Who is going to win this conference?
" weak on paper"?, I think they play on ice. Even when the SEC has an average year, it is still one of the toughest conferences.
Agreed, but I think this looks like it will be a well below average year for the SEC. I just don't see a clear-cut winner because I don't think anyone is very good.
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
komada77
Posts: 505
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:16 pm

Post by komada77 »

Another question for you all: Is there a team in the SEC who will make the state tourney next year?
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

gopherhockey1234 wrote:I know for a fact...i am one of gleinser best friends and i know for a fact that he will not be leaving to go play juniors next season
gopherhockey1234



Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 43

Posted: 06 Jul 2008 17:41 Post subject: More players leaving Hastings???????

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The latest rumor in Hastings is that Jon Gleisner there goalie is leaving to go play Junior hockey. Can anyone in Hastings confirm that? If this is the case that team will not win 3 games all year. He is the one bright spot on that team.

Back to top

Then why did you even bring up the topic that Gleisner was leaving Hastings to play junior hockey?? :roll:
packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Post by packerboy »

komada77 wrote:Another question for you all: Is there a team in the SEC who will make the state tourney next year?
Sure.

Most SEC teams go into Section 3 or 4. HM is in 4 but other than that, things are pretty wide open.

Remember last year, everybody was falling over themselves to hand the section 3 title to Rosemount and Woodbury crushed them in the finals.

Absolutely a SEC team could make it to state.
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

wbmd wrote:
gopherhockey1234 wrote:I know for a fact...i am one of gleinser best friends and i know for a fact that he will not be leaving to go play juniors next season
gopherhockey1234



Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 43

Posted: 06 Jul 2008 17:41 Post subject: More players leaving Hastings???????

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The latest rumor in Hastings is that Jon Gleisner there goalie is leaving to go play Junior hockey. Can anyone in Hastings confirm that? If this is the case that team will not win 3 games all year. He is the one bright spot on that team.

Back to top

Then why did you even bring up the topic that Gleisner was leaving Hastings to play junior hockey?? :roll:
Excellent catch wbmd...good grief ! :?
komada77
Posts: 505
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:16 pm

Post by komada77 »

packerboy wrote:
komada77 wrote:Another question for you all: Is there a team in the SEC who will make the state tourney next year?
Sure.

Most SEC teams go into Section 3 or 4. HM is in 4 but other than that, things are pretty wide open.

Remember last year, everybody was falling over themselves to hand the section 3 title to Rosemount and Woodbury crushed them in the finals.

Absolutely a SEC team could make it to state.
But is WBL or Roseville good enough to beat Hill?
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

komada77 wrote:
packerboy wrote:
komada77 wrote:Another question for you all: Is there a team in the SEC who will make the state tourney next year?
Sure.

Most SEC teams go into Section 3 or 4. HM is in 4 but other than that, things are pretty wide open.

Remember last year, everybody was falling over themselves to hand the section 3 title to Rosemount and Woodbury crushed them in the finals.

Absolutely a SEC team could make it to state.
But is WBL or Roseville good enough to beat Hill?
Just about anybody is good enough to beat Hill - just ask Tartan.
komada77
Posts: 505
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:16 pm

Post by komada77 »

wbmd wrote:
komada77 wrote:
packerboy wrote: Sure.

Most SEC teams go into Section 3 or 4. HM is in 4 but other than that, things are pretty wide open.

Remember last year, everybody was falling over themselves to hand the section 3 title to Rosemount and Woodbury crushed them in the finals.

Absolutely a SEC team could make it to state.
But is WBL or Roseville good enough to beat Hill?
Just about anybody is good enough to beat Hill - just ask Tartan.
:D :D :D
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
gopherhockey1234
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:44 pm

Post by gopherhockey1234 »

It was a different person on this account and he's trying to start rumors about gleisner leaving
wbmd wrote:
gopherhockey1234 wrote:I know for a fact...i am one of gleinser best friends and i know for a fact that he will not be leaving to go play juniors next season
gopherhockey1234



Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 43

Posted: 06 Jul 2008 17:41 Post subject: More players leaving Hastings???????

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The latest rumor in Hastings is that Jon Gleisner there goalie is leaving to go play Junior hockey. Can anyone in Hastings confirm that? If this is the case that team will not win 3 games all year. He is the one bright spot on that team.

Back to top

Then why did you even bring up the topic that Gleisner was leaving Hastings to play junior hockey?? :roll:
RBK26
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:50 pm

Post by RBK26 »

cretin will take it. they got three guys in elite league. WBL has zero. Woodbury has two. and the rest have zero. cdh has the most returners and elite league guys. plus everyone besides cdh, Flake, WBL and woodbury are gonna blow, so not much competition.
komada77
Posts: 505
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:16 pm

Post by komada77 »

RBK26 wrote:cretin will take it. they got three guys in elite league. WBL has zero. Woodbury has two. and the rest have zero. cdh has the most returners and elite league guys. plus everyone besides cdh, Flake, WBL and woodbury are gonna blow, so not much competition.
You can't base a team's success on 3 players. I think Woodbury is the most talented team in the conference, but the goalie situation is shaky and we all know a team is not going to go real far with a bad goalie. And are Woodbury's elite player Pittman and Gaede?
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
RBK26
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:50 pm

Post by RBK26 »

no hyland and gaede. What talent do they have. Are you talking about ther 5 returners and 15 jv kids. Ya sweet team they got, all jv kids.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

RBK26 wrote:no hyland and gaede. What talent do they have. Are you talking about ther 5 returners and 15 jv kids. Ya sweet team they got, all jv kids.
And a jv team that was pretty good last season for Woodbury.
komada77
Posts: 505
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:16 pm

Post by komada77 »

RBK26 wrote:no hyland and gaede. What talent do they have. Are you talking about ther 5 returners and 15 jv kids. Ya sweet team they got, all jv kids.
OK so Hyland and Gaede are the 2 elite players on Woodbury. Pittman is definitely good enough to play elite but doesn't because he plays on 2 baseball teams in the summer. Ill take those 3 over CDH's Zimmerman, Bangs, and Alt every day of the week. And with regard to the talent they have, you need to remeber that experience and talent are 2 completely different things.
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
RBK26
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:50 pm

Post by RBK26 »

ha wow well if he was good enough to make elite than he obviously would have. And better than Alt, i hope your kidding. the cretin boys are much better than those three woodbury boys, and they proved it by all making elite, and alt making the gophers and nationals. Their JV team barely beat cretins JV team last year. Come on now barely any of the cretin jv kids will play varsity this year. nice try though.
komada77
Posts: 505
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:16 pm

Post by komada77 »

RBK26 wrote:ha wow well if he was good enough to make elite than he obviously would have. And better than Alt, i hope your kidding. the cretin boys are much better than those three woodbury boys, and they proved it by all making elite, and alt making the gophers and nationals. Their JV team barely beat cretins JV team last year. Come on now barely any of the cretin jv kids will play varsity this year. nice try though.
I never said anybody in Woodbury is better than Alt. Mark Alt is clearly the best player of the 6 mentioned in the last few posts. Unfortunately for you, one player does not make a team. This is a case of 1 great player (Alt) and 2 decent players (Bangs, Zimmerman) vs. 3 good players (Pittman, Hyland, Gaede). I'll take the 3 good ones 100% of the time. And no one cares if somebody barely beat someone else. A win is a win and a loss is a loss. O and Pittman chose not to tryout for elite because of baseball. He would have made it had he tried out.
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
RBK26
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:50 pm

Post by RBK26 »

you think pittman would have made it, but you don't know for sure. He is not very good. can barely skate. Wasn't hard for him to rack up a few points playing with the best forward in the SEC last year, David Eddy. Cdh's 3 are better than woodbury's 3. and my point on the jv team barely beating cretins is because woodburys whole team is gonna be that jv team and if they can barely beat that jv team how are they gonna beat the cdh varsity team which returns practically most their team who had two very close games with last years woodbury varsity team.
Post Reply