tv coverage
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:16 pm
- Location: St. Paul, MN
tv coverage
Is it me or does it seem like all the "locked" cameras (distant shots) are doing all the coverage? Every once in a while you get a close up (which still looks like a "locked" camera zooming in close), and the handheld cameras are essential to any good high school athletic coverage.
I can splash in the rink puddles!
-
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: tv coverage
Channel 45 doesn't have the equipment budget in place to allocate for HS sports.... The fact that they just jumped on board for HD is remarkable, considering Stanley Hubbard, CEO of Hubbard Broadcasting and KSTP, is one of the pioneers of the satellite digital TV - aka - partners in Direct TV...Nostalgic Nerd wrote:Is it me or does it seem like all the "locked" cameras (distant shots) are doing all the coverage? Every once in a while you get a close up (which still looks like a "locked" camera zooming in close), and the handheld cameras are essential to any good high school athletic coverage.
-
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm
My HD TV isn't a 1080, and it's an older LCD rear projection, but I have Comcast Cable, and with the HD cable box, it's within the HD channels like WCCO, KARE, etc..
It definitely is a digital picture, but I don't know if it's true HD... but apparently they should be broadcasting Wild games and Twins gme in HD... I just know my signal on the HD channel is better than on the original channel..
It definitely is a digital picture, but I don't know if it's true HD... but apparently they should be broadcasting Wild games and Twins gme in HD... I just know my signal on the HD channel is better than on the original channel..
I know it sounds like I'm whinging, but try watching it online. About the worst feed I have seen for online video, poor resolution and much of the time it just quits working. Will the day ever come back when 45 won't be covering the tourny and those of us from outside Minnesota can watch the greatest sports event of the year?
-
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm
-
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:16 pm
- Location: St. Paul, MN
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:18 pm
As I have been beating the dead horse. Let FSN take over the broadcasting. The filters or lighting on the cameras were horrible. It was really hard to see the puck let alone follow it. Plus they didn't have a roaming camera in the fan sections. With 100,000 households watching someones making money. Beside if the airing was worse you'd still have all the Minnesota Hockey Fans watching, It's what your supposed to do this weekend.
bronco2828 wrote:As I have been beating the dead horse. Let FSN take over the broadcasting. The filters or lighting on the cameras were horrible. It was really hard to see the puck let alone follow it. Plus they didn't have a roaming camera in the fan sections. With 100,000 households watching someones making money. Beside if the airing was worse you'd still have all the Minnesota Hockey Fans watching, It's what your supposed to do this weekend.
FSN...FSN...FSN!!!! Please
-
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm
Probably the best picture we've ever had for a state high school tourney, but it was definitely not true HD - looked like the feed was compressed or they were using some non-high def cameras. Not nearly the quality you saw compared to say when NBC televised the Olympics, but compared to the tourney's "olden days" it was a huge improvement.Goldfishdude wrote:My HD TV isn't a 1080, and it's an older LCD rear projection, but I have Comcast Cable, and with the HD cable box, it's within the HD channels like WCCO, KARE, etc..
It definitely is a digital picture, but I don't know if it's true HD... but apparently they should be broadcasting Wild games and Twins gme in HD... I just know my signal on the HD channel is better than on the original channel..
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:47 am
-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:15 pm
How much money does someone make off of 100,000 households? This might be in the running for the dumbest paragraph in 2010. i do not expect a response from the falls.bronco2828 wrote:As I have been beating the dead horse. Let FSN take over the broadcasting. The filters or lighting on the cameras were horrible. It was really hard to see the puck let alone follow it. Plus they didn't have a roaming camera in the fan sections. With 100,000 households watching someones making money. Beside if the airing was worse you'd still have all the Minnesota Hockey Fans watching, It's what your supposed to do this weekend.