Scores and Updates: Saturday, Dec. 1, 2012
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 6480
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
- Contact:
Scores and Updates: Saturday, Dec. 1, 2012
Here you go...
Last edited by karl(east) on Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
-
- Posts: 6480
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
final score
White Bear 3
Woodbury 3
OT
Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.
Woodbury 3
OT
Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.
-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:17 pm
Re: final score
Not sure what you men about WB's current ranking, thier not ranked very high. They did pretty much dominate Woodbury (SOG 38-22), but they just could not put the puck in the net.SECBLUES wrote:White Bear 3
Woodbury 3
OT
Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.
Re: final score
38-22 was a lopsided stat, although Woodbury had less shots, they dominated the game, 80% if WB's shots were weak at best, they continue to take stupid penalties as in other years, # 20 has to learn to pass the puck as well as #2. Half the Defense are sleds, and the coach doesn't like slow defense so I thought. They will be lucky to be 500 in conference, with there lack of discipline (as usual) lack of passing ability and shooting ability. There defense not clearing in front of the net, and the typical playing favorites instead of playing as a team will all effect there outcome as history has shown.inthetwine wrote:Not sure what you men about WB's current ranking, thier not ranked very high. They did pretty much dominate Woodbury (SOG 38-22), but they just could not put the puck in the net.SECBLUES wrote:White Bear 3
Woodbury 3
OT
Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:50 pm
Re: final score
Woodbury only dominated the first two periods. WB then took over the game in the third period by putting up two goals and having numerous other chances to score. #20 Jake Wahlin and #2 Thomas Delaney are WB's best players and were trying to step up and make big plays for the team. WB is a young team and will get better as the year goes on.Edwardo wrote:38-22 was a lopsided stat, although Woodbury had less shots, they dominated the game, 80% if WB's shots were weak at best, they continue to take stupid penalties as in other years, # 20 has to learn to pass the puck as well as #2. Half the Defense are sleds, and the coach doesn't like slow defense so I thought. They will be lucky to be 500 in conference, with there lack of discipline (as usual) lack of passing ability and shooting ability. There defense not clearing in front of the net, and the typical playing favorites instead of playing as a team will all effect there outcome as history has shown.inthetwine wrote:Not sure what you men about WB's current ranking, thier not ranked very high. They did pretty much dominate Woodbury (SOG 38-22), but they just could not put the puck in the net.SECBLUES wrote:White Bear 3
Woodbury 3
OT
Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.
-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:17 pm
Re: final score
Are you kidding, Woodbury only had 11 shots on goal until the 3rd when WB got a 5 minute penalty.Edwardo wrote:38-22 was a lopsided stat, although Woodbury had less shots, they dominated the game, 80% if WB's shots were weak at best, they continue to take stupid penalties as in other years, # 20 has to learn to pass the puck as well as #2. Half the Defense are sleds, and the coach doesn't like slow defense so I thought. They will be lucky to be 500 in conference, with there lack of discipline (as usual) lack of passing ability and shooting ability. There defense not clearing in front of the net, and the typical playing favorites instead of playing as a team will all effect there outcome as history has shown.inthetwine wrote:Not sure what you men about WB's current ranking, thier not ranked very high. They did pretty much dominate Woodbury (SOG 38-22), but they just could not put the puck in the net.SECBLUES wrote:White Bear 3
Woodbury 3
OT
Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.