Unfair advantage for Grand Rapids?

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Sartellcelly
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 8:12 am

Unfair advantage for Grand Rapids?

Post by Sartellcelly »

So, why did the Grand Rapids bench have hand-warming contraptions for Saturday's outdoor game and the Benilde bench did not?
fastncrash
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:42 pm

Re: Unfair advantage for Grand Rapids?

Post by fastncrash »

Sartellcelly wrote:So, why did the Grand Rapids bench have hand-warming contraptions for Saturday's outdoor game and the Benilde bench did not?
Uhhhhh... they were smart enough to think ahead? :?
PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Re: Unfair advantage for Grand Rapids?

Post by PuckU126 »

Sartellcelly wrote:So, why did the Grand Rapids bench have hand-warming contraptions for Saturday's outdoor game and the Benilde bench did not?
Image

Its called a sunflower heater, which are fueled by propane or electricity.

Most ice fishermen use them.

I assume GR brought their own, and I don't consider it an unfair advantage considering the fact they came prepared and BSM did not.

8)
The Puck
LGW
TTpuckster
Posts: 2783
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
Location: State of Hockey

Re: Unfair advantage for Grand Rapids?

Post by TTpuckster »

Sartellcelly wrote:So, why did the Grand Rapids bench have hand-warming contraptions for Saturday's outdoor game and the Benilde bench did not?
I think they should replay it again.
this time at the Excel.

Hey, maybe they will...................... :mrgreen:
almostashappy
Posts: 930
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:07 pm

Re: Unfair advantage for Grand Rapids?

Post by almostashappy »

PuckU126 wrote: Its called a sunflower heater, which are fueled by propane or electricity.

Most ice fishermen use them.

I assume GR brought their own, and I don't consider it an unfair advantage considering the fact they came prepared and BSM did not.

8)
The Venn Diagram intersection of "ice fishermen" and "BSM" is sparsely populated.

But I bet that the full-length fur coats that some of those moms were wearing in the VIP section were warm enough, though. :wink:
Tenoverpar
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:40 pm

a

Post by Tenoverpar »

I'm looking forward to these 2 teams meeting again at the X.

Should they both make it through the sections, the seeding people would do the state hockey fans justice to have these teams play in game 1 for AA.
almostashappy
Posts: 930
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:07 pm

Re: a

Post by almostashappy »

Tenoverpar wrote:I'm looking forward to these 2 teams meeting again at the X.

Should they both make it through the sections, the seeding people would do the state hockey fans justice to have these teams play in game 1 for AA.
Well, since they only seed the top 5 teams (wink, nudge, say no more), then it'd have to be #4 Hill vs #5 BSM, right?

Works for me. :)
Tenoverpar
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:40 pm

s

Post by Tenoverpar »

almosthappy....I see what you're saying but I would just love to see BSM and the G R go at it on a clean sheet of ice with no wind.
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Unfair advantage for Grand Rapids?

Post by BodyShots »

Sartellcelly wrote:So, why did the Grand Rapids bench have hand-warming contraptions for Saturday's outdoor game and the Benilde bench did not?
Maybe coach didn't want them. Much like Bud use to do with the Vikings. :idea:
PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Re: Unfair advantage for Grand Rapids?

Post by PuckU126 »

almostashappy wrote:The Venn Diagram intersection of "ice fishermen" and "BSM" is sparsely populated.
=D> :lol:

More than likely true.

8)
The Puck
LGW
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Post by MrBoDangles »

But the BSM kids were all able to train with Bernie at the "Made". :cry:


The mink wearing BSM daddies have probably never even heard of hand warmers.... 99 cents at Gander.
Metrohockeyfan
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:06 pm

Post by Metrohockeyfan »

I would love to see these two meet at the X, but it is going to be tough seeing how they come out of the two hardest sections in the state.
ShakestheClown
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:11 pm

Post by ShakestheClown »

GR was prepared for the elements and BSM's team wasn't. It's not like nobody had any idea that it was going to be that cold.
northwoods oldtimer
Posts: 2679
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:01 pm

Post by northwoods oldtimer »

MrBoDangles wrote: The mink wearing BSM daddies have probably never even heard of hand warmers.... 99 cents at Gander.
Now that is too darn funny :lol: :lol: :lol:

Teams had to rely on providing their own heat.
Roy01
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:29 pm

Post by Roy01 »

ShakestheClown wrote:GR was prepared for the elements and BSM's team wasn't. It's not like nobody had any idea that it was going to be that cold.
It's cold in Minnesota in January? More so, further up north..? Well, this is news to me.. :-k
defense
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: right here

Post by defense »

How many bsm parents or players even knew where grand rapids was beforehand ? Much less think of heaters.. which most probly didn't even know existed.
I have to agree, seems it was an advantage which rapids took advantage of unfairly.. had any of them ever been on a frozen lake?
east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7428
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Post by east hockey »

defense wrote:How many bsm parents or players even knew where grand rapids was beforehand ? Much less think of heaters.. which most probly didn't even know existed.
I have to agree, seems it was an advantage which rapids took advantage of unfairly.. had any of them ever been on a frozen lake?
The only advantages I see Rapids having were intelligence and foresight. BSM parents and players didn't know where Rapids was? If that is true (and I don't believe it is), then it only speaks to arrogance.

Bet they know where Grand Rapids is now. Knowledge of tradition in Minnesota high school hockey should have taught them that beforehand.

Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7428
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Post by east hockey »

Roy01 wrote:
ShakestheClown wrote:GR was prepared for the elements and BSM's team wasn't. It's not like nobody had any idea that it was going to be that cold.
It's cold in Minnesota in January? More so, further up north..? Well, this is news to me.. :-k
God help them if they had to play outside in Roseau or Warroad, eh? :wink:

Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Post by PuckU126 »

defense wrote:I have to agree, seems it was an advantage which rapids took advantage of unfairly.. had any of them ever been on a frozen lake?
Really?

Being well prepared is now an unfair advantage?

That's pushing it, D... Unless you are being sarcastic.

8)
The Puck
LGW
East Side Pioneer Guy
Posts: 1660
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:43 pm

Post by East Side Pioneer Guy »

So which is it? Are private school parents parochial and ignorant of anything outside of the metro area, or are they so wealthy they can take lavish vacations and own comfortable cabins in lake country? Decide which it is, be consistent.

And if BSM parents are acceptable targets, is it OK to call the rubes from the Range a bunch of bumpkins?

I'd love to see that BSM-Grand Rapids rematch in March. It'll be a lot better on the big sheet at Mariucci.
east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7428
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Post by east hockey »

East Side Pioneer Guy wrote:So which is it? Are private school parents parochial and ignorant of anything outside of the metro area, or are they so wealthy they can take lavish vacations and own comfortable cabins in lake country? Decide which it is, be consistent.

And if BSM parents are acceptable targets, is it OK to call the rubes from the Range a bunch of bumpkins?

I'd love to see that BSM-Grand Rapids rematch in March. It'll be a lot better on the big sheet at Mariucci.
I'd prefer to see an East-Wayzata rematch myself. :)

Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
East Side Pioneer Guy
Posts: 1660
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:43 pm

Post by East Side Pioneer Guy »

east hockey wrote:
East Side Pioneer Guy wrote:So which is it? Are private school parents parochial and ignorant of anything outside of the metro area, or are they so wealthy they can take lavish vacations and own comfortable cabins in lake country? Decide which it is, be consistent.

And if BSM parents are acceptable targets, is it OK to call the rubes from the Range a bunch of bumpkins?

I'd love to see that BSM-Grand Rapids rematch in March. It'll be a lot better on the big sheet at Mariucci.
I'd prefer to see an East-Wayzata rematch myself. :)

Lee
That, too, would be a great game at Mariucci. I'll sell you my consolation tickets.
defense
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: right here

Post by defense »

Sorry guys.. I wrote a totally sarcastic post.. forgot the lol's I guess. My bad.
PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Post by PuckU126 »

East Side Pioneer Guy wrote:So which is it? Are private school parents parochial and ignorant of anything outside of the metro area, or are they so wealthy they can take lavish vacations and own comfortable cabins in lake country? Decide which it is, be consistent.
It would be a blanket statement either way.

And both show true ignorance as well.

Perhaps people were merely poking fun, and we shouldn't take it to heart.

8)
The Puck
LGW
HShockeywatcher
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm

Post by HShockeywatcher »

defense wrote:Sorry guys.. I wrote a totally sarcastic post.. forgot the lol's I guess. My bad.
Interesting no one noticed. It's okay to be rude back sarcasm flies right on by #-o
Post Reply