Different Teams at the Xcel

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

greenway1969
Posts: 792
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:29 am

Different Teams at the Xcel

Post by greenway1969 »

Some different teams at the State Tournament would create a more exciting atmospherre. The same teams (Edina, Hill-Murray, Moorhead, Eden Praire, Blaine, Duluth East) year after year takes away some of the interest. What I would like to see.

Section 1: Rochester Mayo - Maybe having a Rochester team in the tournament would give their youth programs a shot in the arm.
Section 2: I'm torn between Burnsville and Prior Lake. I'd like to see Burnsville at the Xcel because they have the best student section in the state. Prior Lake would be good because they have never been to state.
Section 3: Hastings has been absent for a while and they have some decent wins.
Section 4: Like to see Stillwater so Housley wouldn't be able to do any of the broadcasting.
Section 5: Centennial, another team with a long absence.
Section 6: Holy Family
Section 7: Rapids becasue they have the best band.
Section 8: Brainerd, another first timer.

The tournament will be fun whoever makes it, but some fresh blood would add to the excitement.
GPGT
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:24 pm

Post by GPGT »

Good lord. There's a reason those teams probably won't be there. I dunno about you but I want to see the best teams there. Not the team with the best band or fans. If your first post was the tourney, I'd be willing to bet attendance would be way down
preferhockey
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:07 am

Post by preferhockey »

Would also like to see some new teams. Will still be exciting!

From a guy who likes the underdog.
DubCHAGuy
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:44 am

Post by DubCHAGuy »

I'd say there is a pretty good chance you will see some combination of PL/Burnsville, Centennial, Rapids, or Brainerd this year. I also like seeing a few new teams mixed in with the traditional powers.
MNpuckBlog
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:53 pm
Contact:

Post by MNpuckBlog »

Always nice to see new teams at the tourney. I was happy to see Eagan make it in 2011 after making their first appearance in 06. Centennial could be a team that could make it depending on their goaltending. When he plays good he can steal a game for them. I'm not totally against Edina making it since they are always good enough to be there, but they have made 6 or 7 straight tourneys so seeing a new team (Prior Lake) would be exciting to see. Holy Family would be a nice story if they made it, but their section is incredibly deep and they are probably a few years from having their program really grow to where they are a contender in the postseason.
Snap Happy
Posts: 226
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:39 pm

Post by Snap Happy »

Section 6: Wayzata would be nice to see there. HF has zero chance of making it through EP, BSM, then Tonka/Wayzata. They would be a poor representation of the states toughest section.
almostashappy
Posts: 930
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:07 pm

Post by almostashappy »

Snap Happy wrote:HF has zero chance of making it through EP, BSM, then Tonka/Wayzata. They would be a poor representation of the states toughest section.
They would be poor representatives of Section 6 after having beaten EP, BSM and Tonka/Wayzata, one right after the other? ](*,)
Shinbone_News
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:50 am

Post by Shinbone_News »

I know it would be completely crazy and expensive to do this, but it would be kind of cool if they seeded the entire state, sort of like NCAA basketball, and built the brackets that way (keeping A and AA distinct, OK).

Expensive, because you'd have to find a way to have #29 Luverne play #82 Ely, while #19 Roseau hosts #67 Winona. There'd probably be a greyhound traffic jam on I-94.
old goalie85
Posts: 3696
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm

Post by old goalie85 »

I'm sure the touny would make enough to cover it. How much would TV/Ticket /T-shirt/ thype stuff make ?? 64 teams both classes together. A on one side AA on the other. Final four would be top two from each class.
hockeyhockeyhockey
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:44 pm

Re: Different Teams at the Xcel

Post by hockeyhockeyhockey »

greenway1969 wrote:Some different teams at the State Tournament would create a more exciting atmospherre. The same teams (Edina, Hill-Murray, Moorhead, Eden Praire, Blaine, Duluth East) year after year takes away some of the interest. What I would like to see.

Section 1: Rochester Mayo - Maybe having a Rochester team in the tournament would give their youth programs a shot in the arm.
Section 2: I'm torn between Burnsville and Prior Lake. I'd like to see Burnsville at the Xcel because they have the best student section in the state. Prior Lake would be good because they have never been to state.
Section 3: Hastings has been absent for a while and they have some decent wins.
Section 4: Like to see Stillwater so Housley wouldn't be able to do any of the broadcasting.
Section 5: Centennial, another team with a long absence.
Section 6: Holy Family
Section 7: Rapids becasue they have the best band.
Section 8: Brainerd, another first timer.

The tournament will be fun whoever makes it, but some fresh blood would add to the excitement.
Man I go every year but if even half of those teams made it I would skip..what a disaster that would be..bring me Hill Edina, BSM Duluth East, Eagan, blaine, bring in a new section 1 team every so often and a new section 8 team hre and there that is fine
urban iceman
Posts: 388
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Different Teams at the Xcel

Post by urban iceman »

hockeyhockeyhockey wrote:
greenway1969 wrote:Some different teams at the State Tournament would create a more exciting atmospherre. The same teams (Edina, Hill-Murray, Moorhead, Eden Praire, Blaine, Duluth East) year after year takes away some of the interest. What I would like to see.

Section 1: Rochester Mayo - Maybe having a Rochester team in the tournament would give their youth programs a shot in the arm.
Section 2: I'm torn between Burnsville and Prior Lake. I'd like to see Burnsville at the Xcel because they have the best student section in the state. Prior Lake would be good because they have never been to state.
Section 3: Hastings has been absent for a while and they have some decent wins.
Section 4: Like to see Stillwater so Housley wouldn't be able to do any of the broadcasting.
Section 5: Centennial, another team with a long absence.
Section 6: Holy Family
Section 7: Rapids becasue they have the best band.
Section 8: Brainerd, another first timer.

The tournament will be fun whoever makes it, but some fresh blood would add to the excitement.
Man I go every year but if even half of those teams made it I would skip..what a disaster that would be..bring me Hill Edina, BSM Duluth East, Eagan, blaine, bring in a new section 1 team every so often and a new section 8 team hre and there that is fine
Then you might as well do like football and have an "Elite class" that will be the same teams every year at State :roll:
celly93
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:47 pm

Post by celly93 »

I think we can all agree that we like seeing different teams at the tournament as long as they deserve to be there.
north_bear
Posts: 615
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:25 pm
Location: G.R.

Post by north_bear »

^^ Agreed. And by "deserved to be there" you mean they won their section. If they didn't win their section they don't deserve to be at State, pretty simple.
Thunderhawk Fanatic!!
East Side Pioneer Guy
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:43 pm

Post by East Side Pioneer Guy »

People say they want to see new teams. But money talks and you know what walks. And the money says people want to see Hill and Edina. They hope to see them lose,but they will pay to see them.

I want to see the best team from each section.

It's also nice to see the small schools do well. Like Hill.
HShockeywatcher
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm

Post by HShockeywatcher »

Shinbone_News wrote:I know it would be completely crazy and expensive to do this, but it would be kind of cool if they seeded the entire state, sort of like NCAA basketball, and built the brackets that way (keeping A and AA distinct, OK).

Expensive, because you'd have to find a way to have #29 Luverne play #82 Ely, while #19 Roseau hosts #67 Winona. There'd probably be a greyhound traffic jam on I-94.
The other thing the NCAA does is use the top 4 as the top seeds, then they seed each region geographically. It wouldn't be perfect, but if we had 8 "regions" then it wouldn't be that big of a deal.

Like with any change, if enough coaches/ADs care and want something to happen, it will. Coaches seem to not have the same feelings that fans do...
pucknight
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:52 pm

Post by pucknight »

East Side Pioneer Guy wrote:People say they want to see new teams. But money talks and you know what walks. And the money says people want to see Hill and Edina. They hope to see them lose,but they will pay to see them.

I want to see the best team from each section.

It's also nice to see the small schools do well. Like Hill.
I always find the "private schools make for empty buildings" notion funny.

According to the MSHSL, three sessions have drawn over 19,000 going back to 2005. BSM has participated in all three. Edina and Hill-Murray have been in two apiece.

-2008 Thursday Afternoon: 19,232
Edina vs Cloquet
BSM vs Woodbury

-2008 Friday Night: 19,547
BSM vs Edina
Roseau vs Hill-Murray

-2012 Friday Night: 19,197
Moorhead vs Hill-Murray
BSM vs Lakeville South

I find the 2008 Friday night session stands out as the least proportionate to school size. For example, the combined enrollment of those schools is 4,418. The next year, 2009, 18,032 people attended the Friday night session, the lowest Friday night total from 2005-2012. The combined enrollment for those schools (Eden Prairie, Blaine, Moorhead, CDH) is 8,242.

This probably is mostly due to coincidence, but I believe it does dispel the "private schools make for empty buildings" notion, at least for state.

If you find any mistakes in my math or anything like that, let me know in a civilized manor.

Sources:
Teams: minnhock.com
Enrollment: mnhockeyhub.com
Attendance: http://www.mshsl.org/mshsl/publications ... eyBoys.pdf
DubCHAGuy
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:44 am

Post by DubCHAGuy »

pucknight wrote:
East Side Pioneer Guy wrote:People say they want to see new teams. But money talks and you know what walks. And the money says people want to see Hill and Edina. They hope to see them lose,but they will pay to see them.

I want to see the best team from each section.

It's also nice to see the small schools do well. Like Hill.
I always find the "private schools make for empty buildings" notion funny.

According to the MSHSL, three sessions have drawn over 19,000 going back to 2005. BSM has participated in all three. Edina and Hill-Murray have been in two apiece.

-2008 Thursday Afternoon: 19,232
Edina vs Cloquet
BSM vs Woodbury

-2008 Friday Night: 19,547
BSM vs Edina
Roseau vs Hill-Murray

-2012 Friday Night: 19,197
Moorhead vs Hill-Murray
BSM vs Lakeville South

I find the 2008 Friday night session stands out as the least proportionate to school size. For example, the combined enrollment of those schools is 4,418. The next year, 2009, 18,032 people attended the Friday night session, the lowest Friday night total from 2005-2012. The combined enrollment for those schools (Eden Prairie, Blaine, Moorhead, CDH) is 8,242.

This probably is mostly due to coincidence, but I believe it does dispel the "private schools make for empty buildings" notion, at least for state.

If you find any mistakes in my math or anything like that, let me know in a civilized manor.

Sources:
Teams: minnhock.com
Enrollment: mnhockeyhub.com
Attendance: http://www.mshsl.org/mshsl/publications ... eyBoys.pdf

Agreed. Public vs. Private or any small northern school vs. big suburban school make for the largest crowds and best atmosphere.
SPUDNUT
Posts: 978
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: Moorhead

Re: Different Teams at the Xcel

Post by SPUDNUT »

greenway1969 wrote:Some different teams at the State Tournament would create a more exciting atmospherre. The same teams (Edina, Hill-Murray, Moorhead, Eden Praire, Blaine, Duluth East) year after year takes away some of the interest. What I would like to see.

Section 1: Rochester Mayo - Maybe having a Rochester team in the tournament would give their youth programs a shot in the arm.
Section 2: I'm torn between Burnsville and Prior Lake. I'd like to see Burnsville at the Xcel because they have the best student section in the state. Prior Lake would be good because they have never been to state.
Section 3: Hastings has been absent for a while and they have some decent wins.
Section 4: Like to see Stillwater so Housley wouldn't be able to do any of the broadcasting.
Section 5: Centennial, another team with a long absence.
Section 6: Holy Family
Section 7: Rapids becasue they have the best band.
Section 8: Brainerd, another first timer.

The tournament will be fun whoever makes it, but some fresh blood would add to the excitement.


You left out Greenway !
Doc Holliday
Posts: 657
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: SW Suburbs

Post by Doc Holliday »

If you don't have an Edina or Hill-Murray, who's everyone going to cheer against? :D

Villans are necessary for a great state tournament. And I like upsets too, but be careful what you wish for. Everyone loved Lakeville South beating Duluth East last year, but the reward was the drubbing Benilde put on them the next night.
Tenoverpar
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:40 pm

r

Post by Tenoverpar »

Section 4: Like to see Stillwater so Housley wouldn't be able to do any of the broadcasting

that's a funny quote....Stillwater lost their best defensive player to the USHL a month ago..they've struggled to regain their game since
celly93
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:47 pm

Post by celly93 »

Well, you got your wish. Four new teams, three that haven't been to the tournament in quite some time.
HShockeywatcher
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm

Post by HShockeywatcher »

celly93 wrote:Well, you got your wish. Four new teams, three that haven't been to the tournament in quite some time.
While few care about Class A:

EGF: First tournament in 11 years.
Apollo: First tournament in 29 years.
Marshall: First tournament ever.

It'll be cool to see some new teams out there.
thestickler07
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm

Post by thestickler07 »

If you got the top 64 teams out of subsections for a state tournament an interesting twist would be random draw every round FA Cup style.

Just put 64 names in a tumbler and draw them out two by two, played at home sites with the smaller school by enrollment getting home ice. After the first round is done throw the 32 names back in the tumbler and repeat until you are down to 8 when they go to St. Paul.

Obviously would never happen because of the fear of the nightmare #1 vs #2 matchup round one, but it would undoubtedly create some great matchups and a lot of excitement. People would be huddling around radios and TVs starting middle of February listening to who's going to play who and how long the road trip would be. Plus with the smaller enrollment home ice advantage you would have a lot of metro teams heading up north which could make for some excitement.

Think about having Edina or BSM having to go to Amsoil to play East in a state tourney game. Or BSM having to make the trek to Roseau for a first round game.
hawkhockey
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:53 pm

Post by hawkhockey »

thestickler07 wrote:If you got the top 64 teams out of subsections for a state tournament an interesting twist would be random draw every round FA Cup style.

Just put 64 names in a tumbler and draw them out two by two, played at home sites with the smaller school by enrollment getting home ice. After the first round is done throw the 32 names back in the tumbler and repeat until you are down to 8 when they go to St. Paul.

Obviously would never happen because of the fear of the nightmare #1 vs #2 matchup round one, but it would undoubtedly create some great matchups and a lot of excitement. People would be huddling around radios and TVs starting middle of February listening to who's going to play who and how long the road trip would be. Plus with the smaller enrollment home ice advantage you would have a lot of metro teams heading up north which could make for some excitement.

Think about having Edina or BSM having to go to Amsoil to play East in a state tourney game. Or BSM having to make the trek to Roseau for a first round game.
Nice FA cup reference. I bet most people on the board dont get that. Go gunners
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Post by BodyShots »

hawkhockey wrote:
thestickler07 wrote:If you got the top 64 teams out of subsections for a state tournament an interesting twist would be random draw every round FA Cup style.

Just put 64 names in a tumbler and draw them out two by two, played at home sites with the smaller school by enrollment getting home ice. After the first round is done throw the 32 names back in the tumbler and repeat until you are down to 8 when they go to St. Paul.

Obviously would never happen because of the fear of the nightmare #1 vs #2 matchup round one, but it would undoubtedly create some great matchups and a lot of excitement. People would be huddling around radios and TVs starting middle of February listening to who's going to play who and how long the road trip would be. Plus with the smaller enrollment home ice advantage you would have a lot of metro teams heading up north which could make for some excitement.

Think about having Edina or BSM having to go to Amsoil to play East in a state tourney game. Or BSM having to make the trek to Roseau for a first round game.
Nice FA cup reference. I bet most people on the board dont get that. Go gunners
No clue. Free Alcohol? Fred Astaire? Free Agent?
Post Reply