New Section Assignments
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 7:02 pm
New Section Assignments
MSHSL.org just posted them.
Check it out
Biggest thing to jump out to me STA going to 3AA and
Section 5A becoming as bad as 3A, Htown moving to 7A makes that sections STACKED
Check it out
Biggest thing to jump out to me STA going to 3AA and
Section 5A becoming as bad as 3A, Htown moving to 7A makes that sections STACKED
Re: New Section Assignments
cjmhockey19 wrote:MSHSL.org just posted them.
Check it out
Biggest thing to jump out to me STA going to 3AA and
Section 5A becoming as bad as 3A, Htown moving to 7A makes that sections STACKED
Yep. Not many changes. Certainly none that will please the people looking for more competitive balance. Sorry if I missed any.
AA
1- none
2- adds New Ulm and LeSeur-Henderson. Loses Kennedy
3- adds STA
4- adds Minnehaha and Irondale. Loses Como Park.
5- adds Rogers. loses Irondale
6- none
7- none
8- none
A
1- none
2- adds Kennedy
3- none
4- adds Como. Loses STA and Spring Lake Park
5- Loses Hermantown AND SCC. Adds SLP
6- adds SCC
7- adds Hermantown
8- none
http://mshsl.org/mshsl/competitiveSectionsone3.asp
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:33 pm
-
- Posts: 6480
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:11 am
People arent gonna be happy, but boy oh boy does it make sence in class A for Cathedral and Hermantown.
Unfortunately 5A also becomes a weak section along with 3A.
6AA wasnt broken up and St Thomas has to go through Eagan and Eastview now.
Burnsville or Prior Lake wernt added to 1AA which is suprising.
Cant say im suprised at the lack of change though.
Unfortunately 5A also becomes a weak section along with 3A.
6AA wasnt broken up and St Thomas has to go through Eagan and Eastview now.
Burnsville or Prior Lake wernt added to 1AA which is suprising.
Cant say im suprised at the lack of change though.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Re: New Section Assignments
This is great. Nothing to complain about geographically. They really nailed it this time. Great job to the MSHSL on these sections.DubCHAGuy wrote:http://mshsl.org/mshsl/competitiveSectionsone3.asp
Did Minnehaha opt up, or is their co-op numbers what bumped them into AA?
Looking forward to the STA/CDH section games!
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:13 am
Kennedy is going A? Wow. I know they haven't been competitive, but their enrollment is down too?
Last edited by jonandrews13 on Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
What is the rational for putting co-op teams in AA? Teams don't co-op to form one big "super team." Teams co-op because one or all of the teams can't field a team without co-oping. Putting them in AA makes zero sense to me.karl(east) wrote:Along with LSHSPTCUC. Gotta love these "big schools" getting forced up to the level where they belong!PuckU126 wrote:New Ulm to AA? Really?
![]()
I wish they'd find a way to make longer-term exceptions for these programs that need 5+ schools to put a team together.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:33 pm
Under the rules straight enrolment numbers for all the schools are used to determine the enrolment for a co-op team.HShockeywatcher wrote:What is the rational for putting co-op teams in AA? Teams don't co-op to form one big "super team." Teams co-op because one or all of the teams can't field a team without co-oping. Putting them in AA makes zero sense to me.karl(east) wrote:Along with LSHSPTCUC. Gotta love these "big schools" getting forced up to the level where they belong!PuckU126 wrote:New Ulm to AA? Really?
![]()
I wish they'd find a way to make longer-term exceptions for these programs that need 5+ schools to put a team together.
-
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:41 am
- Location: Orange County, California
- Contact:
Completely agree.HShockeywatcher wrote:What is the rational for putting co-op teams in AA? Teams don't co-op to form one big "super team." Teams co-op because one or all of the teams can't field a team without co-oping. Putting them in AA makes zero sense to me.karl(east) wrote:Along with LSHSPTCUC. Gotta love these "big schools" getting forced up to the level where they belong!PuckU126 wrote:New Ulm to AA? Really?
![]()
I wish they'd find a way to make longer-term exceptions for these programs that need 5+ schools to put a team together.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
I know what the rule is. It's clear. I'm asking for the rational for the rule.paulsonj72 wrote:Under the rules straight enrolment numbers for all the schools are used to determine the enrolment for a co-op team.HShockeywatcher wrote:What is the rational for putting co-op teams in AA? Teams don't co-op to form one big "super team." Teams co-op because one or all of the teams can't field a team without co-oping. Putting them in AA makes zero sense to me.karl(east) wrote: Along with LSHSPTCUC. Gotta love these "big schools" getting forced up to the level where they belong!![]()
I wish they'd find a way to make longer-term exceptions for these programs that need 5+ schools to put a team together.
If we are counting a kid who gets a lunch for free or at a reduced price from the state as less than a person for a very legitimate reason, doesn't it seem that having to co-op is an even better reason to count them differently?
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Re: New Section Assignments
You're as big of a joke as the program you follow.HShockeywatcher wrote:This is great. Nothing to complain about geographically. They really nailed it this time. Great job to the MSHSL on these sections.DubCHAGuy wrote:http://mshsl.org/mshsl/competitiveSectionsone3.asp
Did Minnehaha opt up, or is their co-op numbers what bumped them into AA?
Looking forward to the STA/CDH section games!
-
- Posts: 2679
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:01 pm
New sections
Hshw
Where's the party tonite? Enjoy it while it lasts, success is fleeting.
Where's the party tonite? Enjoy it while it lasts, success is fleeting.
-
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:07 pm
Re: New Section Assignments
Hey now, no need to be snippy.MrBoDangles wrote:You're as big of a joke as the program you follow.HShockeywatcher wrote:This is great. Nothing to complain about geographically. They really nailed it this time. Great job to the MSHSL on these sections.DubCHAGuy wrote:http://mshsl.org/mshsl/competitiveSectionsone3.asp
Did Minnehaha opt up, or is their co-op numbers what bumped them into AA?
Looking forward to the STA/CDH section games!
There's always a chance that STA and CDH would meet in the Section quarterfinals.

-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Re: New Section Assignments
This is great! Epic CDH - STA battles!almostashappy wrote:Hey now, no need to be snippy.MrBoDangles wrote:You're as big of a joke as the program you follow.HShockeywatcher wrote: This is great. Nothing to complain about geographically. They really nailed it this time. Great job to the MSHSL on these sections.
Did Minnehaha opt up, or is their co-op numbers what bumped them into AA?
Looking forward to the STA/CDH section games!
There's always a chance that STA and CDH would meet in the Section quarterfinals.
The kid is a joke!

-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Re: New Section Assignments
Not sure sure what I said he is commenting on. Was it me congratulating the MSHSL for getting section alignments right or for being happy to be in the same section as my alma mater's 100+ year rival?almostashappy wrote:Hey now, no need to be snippy.MrBoDangles wrote:You're as big of a joke as the program you follow.HShockeywatcher wrote: This is great. Nothing to complain about geographically. They really nailed it this time. Great job to the MSHSL on these sections.
Did Minnehaha opt up, or is their co-op numbers what bumped them into AA?
Looking forward to the STA/CDH section games!
There's always a chance that STA and CDH would meet in the Section quarterfinals.

almostashappy, doesn't matter what round it is, the venue will be packed.
The fact that they are placed in AA is a way to prevent teams from trying the "super team" tactic. The logic is, "it's not worth joining those organizations to get better because we'll have to be bumped up." Some associations don't mind the bump up because it only affects them in the postseason.HShockeywatcher wrote:What is the rational for putting co-op teams in AA? Teams don't co-op to form one big "super team." Teams co-op because one or all of the teams can't field a team without co-oping. Putting them in AA makes zero sense to me.karl(east) wrote:Along with LSHSPTCUC. Gotta love these "big schools" getting forced up to the level where they belong!PuckU126 wrote:New Ulm to AA? Really?
![]()
I wish they'd find a way to make longer-term exceptions for these programs that need 5+ schools to put a team together.
Also co-ops aren't usually formed because that's the only way a team can be formed. It's usually a way to get some kids from a school that may not enough players to form a team on their own playing the game. Occasionally the school or schools that get added bump the original school that could have its own team from A to AA, which is unfair to the school that accepts the smaller one. That's how New Ulm has gotten their petitions passed recently.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
That's exactly what I said...MHGr8ness wrote:The fact that they are placed in AA is a way to prevent teams from trying the "super team" tactic. The logic is, "it's not worth joining those organizations to get better because we'll have to be bumped up." Some associations don't mind the bump up because it only affects them in the postseason.HShockeywatcher wrote:What is the rational for putting co-op teams in AA? Teams don't co-op to form one big "super team." Teams co-op because one or all of the teams can't field a team without co-oping. Putting them in AA makes zero sense to me.karl(east) wrote: Along with LSHSPTCUC. Gotta love these "big schools" getting forced up to the level where they belong!![]()
I wish they'd find a way to make longer-term exceptions for these programs that need 5+ schools to put a team together.
Also co-ops aren't usually formed because that's the only way a team can be formed. It's usually a way to get some kids from a school that may not enough players to form a team on their own playing the game. Occasionally the school or schools that get added bump the original school that could have its own team from A to AA, which is unfair to the school that accepts the smaller one. That's how New Ulm has gotten their petitions passed recently.
-
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:07 pm
Re: New Section Assignments
That, I don't doubt.HShockeywatcher wrote: almostashappy, doesn't matter what round it is, the venue will be packed.
I'll be curious to see what Eagan's non-conf schedule looks like next year now that STA is a section opponent. Got a non-conf slot available (assuming no re-invite to HDM).
MSHSL spokesperson (@MSHSLjohn) has a twitter account, and just posted this gem:
Nobody has pushed for a private school league? He obviously hasn't been following some of the threads in this forum.MSHSLjohn No one has pushed for that. RT @jcrpete: @MSHSLjohn Has there been talk of private school league vs. public school league? #mshsl

-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
Re: New Section Assignments
almostashappy wrote:Nobody whose opinion means anything has pushed for a private school league? He obviously hasn't been following some of the threads in this forum.
