Two schools share title after 7 OTs

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply

Was agreeing to sharing the title the right move?

Poll ended at Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:12 pm

Yes, it was the right thing to do - players become too susceptible to injury when they are completely exhausted
2
7%
No, they should keep playing until someone scores - there should be only one winner
26
93%
 
Total votes: 28

MNHockeyFan
Posts: 7260
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm

Two schools share title after 7 OTs

Post by MNHockeyFan »

goldy313
Posts: 3949
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 11:56 am

Post by goldy313 »

To read the details in the Cleveland Plain Dealer hydration was becoming a major concern. I guess maybe stop it and continue it on another day would be possible but then you have logistics to deal with. Both coaches agreed with decision.

"I know my boys would have kept playing. I know their boys would have kept on playing too, but, at some point the adults have to step in" said St. Ignatius coach Pat O'Rourke. Northview coach Mike Jones said he did not think it would be appropriate to continue as several players on both teams were dealing with cramps and struggling to stay hydrated.

I'd have to defer to people actually there and seeing the kids. If the coaches or trainers are showing concern for safety I think you have to stop.
puckbreath
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm

Post by puckbreath »

Wasn't their a title game here awhile back with a similar scenario, but the teams called a break, and came back the next day ?
Slammer
Posts: 606
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:49 am
Location: Burnsville, MN

Post by Slammer »

I might be the only one that thinks this was the right call..... It's dangerous to keep playing after all of that time, and If both coaches and the refs agreed then obviously it's the right call for that particular game.

If you go to 7 OT's the only way you can really win is by some fluke goal.... The players should be happy that they are getting a state championship rather than 2nd place.
DE could've "easily" won state the last 5 years.
Ref22
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:30 am

Post by Ref22 »

Slammer wrote:I might be the only one that thinks this was the right call..... It's dangerous to keep playing after all of that time, and If both coaches and the refs agreed then obviously it's the right call for that particular game.

If you go to 7 OT's the only way you can really win is by some fluke goal.... The players should be happy that they are getting a state championship rather than 2nd place.
Seven 8 minutes overtimes really isnt that much.
sinbin
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:12 pm

Post by sinbin »

Were they really all 8-minute OT's? The Tonka-LN girls state semi-final game last year went 6 OT's, but this was a mix of 8- and 17-minute OT's. That game lasted 113 minutes (so longer than the Ohio game could have lasted), if I recall and both teams had to play games the next day. And if I further recall, both teams won the next day. Yes, I realize that the boys game is different than the girls and that a semi-final game is required to have a winner advance to the championship game, but those girls did OK. Of course, they're from Minnesota, not Ohio.
MNHockeyFan
Posts: 7260
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm

Post by MNHockeyFan »

sinbin wrote:Of course, they're from Minnesota, not Ohio.
As we all know, that's the real key! :wink:
Post Reply