MSHSL Game Limit
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 2:30 am
MSHSL Game Limit
Is there any circumstance where a MN HS team could play more the 25 games in the regular season?
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:23 am
Re: MSHSL Game Limit
.GoldenBear69 wrote:Is there any circumstance where a MN HS team could play more the 25 games in the regular season?
Goldenbear69: I did read on a thread a couple weeks back that 2 teams were allowed to play 26 games to help fill out a couple schedules. Otherwise I am unaware of this happening before.
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 2:30 am
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:25 pm
- Location: G.R.
Bantam season is at least 30 - 40 days longer.
Boys HS league is 17 weeks. First practice to state final game. Actually it is a couple days under 17 weeks if you are really counting.
Academics is for real at the HS level (it counts and colleges are looking). The vast majority of HS players will not play college hockey. A HS game is an all evening affair. Leave afterschool, JV and Varsity games, often long bus rides and not home until 10 or so.
There is a fine line between tip-top conditioned and worn down. True for any team entering the play offs in the NHL, College Hockey, and the HS hockey levels.
Boys HS league is 17 weeks. First practice to state final game. Actually it is a couple days under 17 weeks if you are really counting.

Academics is for real at the HS level (it counts and colleges are looking). The vast majority of HS players will not play college hockey. A HS game is an all evening affair. Leave afterschool, JV and Varsity games, often long bus rides and not home until 10 or so.
There is a fine line between tip-top conditioned and worn down. True for any team entering the play offs in the NHL, College Hockey, and the HS hockey levels.
It would be very easy to increase games...
The league will not increase the 17 weeks,period.
1. Allow double-header games on non-school days(no Sun)..with mandated time between games
2. Only 1 game per week allowed on school days,
creating 4 days of practice/week on typical school week
You now have more games and more practices
The league will not increase the 17 weeks,period.
1. Allow double-header games on non-school days(no Sun)..with mandated time between games
2. Only 1 game per week allowed on school days,
creating 4 days of practice/week on typical school week
You now have more games and more practices
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
The cry for more games has always puzzled me. You have the school factor for the student athletes as well as what many families/parents are already doing to make it work for their children. Beyond that, though, practice is an integral part of sports. Not sure how you have games 1/3 of the season and do everything you need to at practice; it could compromise the integrity of games and/or the validity of their results.
One thing that makes MN very unique, something many here take for granted, is the distinction of 3 unique seasons. Unless you make it far in state, you can play 3 sports and not miss time in any. In many other places, mainly ones with no snow, when the fall sport ends, the spring one begins, and if a winter sport is your main sport, you many not be able to play another sport because of the overlap.
One thing that makes MN very unique, something many here take for granted, is the distinction of 3 unique seasons. Unless you make it far in state, you can play 3 sports and not miss time in any. In many other places, mainly ones with no snow, when the fall sport ends, the spring one begins, and if a winter sport is your main sport, you many not be able to play another sport because of the overlap.
Not a terrible idea. It would increase games and "the season" by over 15% without doing much.thestickler07 wrote:It would be easier for all involved to just increase period lengths to 20 minutes.
-
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:12 pm
-
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm
-
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm
Many teachers are in favor of year round schooling and it would not really be the teachers Unions final decision. Regardless, it seems unlikely they add games to the hockey season unless they extend the seasons length. But they most likely won't extend the seasons length without extending the other sport's seasons too. The best you could hope for I believe is 20 minute periods.MNHockeyFan wrote:The powerful teachers' unions would never go along with this. Instead, I think they should raise the maximum number of regular season games to 30 and play 20 minute periods.green4 wrote:Something totally out of their control, but if school ever became year round...
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
This^green4 wrote:Many teachers are in favor of year round schooling and it would not really be the teachers Unions final decision. Regardless, it seems unlikely they add games to the hockey season unless they extend the seasons length. But they most likely won't extend the seasons length without extending the other sport's seasons too. The best you could hope for I believe is 20 minute periods.MNHockeyFan wrote:The powerful teachers' unions would never go along with this. Instead, I think they should raise the maximum number of regular season games to 30 and play 20 minute periods.green4 wrote:Something totally out of their control, but if school ever became year round...
Many nations around the world have about 30 more contact days than the US while about 60% of the contact hours. Change is something many teachers are behind.
I honestly think change is possible if hockey people get out of the mindset that hockey's different and work within the framework that we'd need to make it work for all of the sports.
As is, half of teams are eliminated from playoffs after the first week and some teams sit around for a while before the next season starts. You could easily add a week on the front and back of most seasons. You could further change playoffs to something you have to qualify for and add more. Teams in state may miss the beginning of some seasons. Etc, etc.
Ultimately, the biggest issue I see is being "fair" to spring. A couple of the last 5 springs have seen basically month long seasons. Out of our control but a very real consideration.
-
- Posts: 2679
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:01 pm
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:50 pm
Yeah, I see teachers picketing all the time trying to work summers, they hate having summer offgreen4 wrote:Many teachers are in favor of year round schooling and it would not really be the teachers Unions final decision. Regardless, it seems unlikely they add games to the hockey season unless they extend the seasons length. But they most likely won't extend the seasons length without extending the other sport's seasons too. The best you could hope for I believe is 20 minute periods.MNHockeyFan wrote:The powerful teachers' unions would never go along with this. Instead, I think they should raise the maximum number of regular season games to 30 and play 20 minute periods.green4 wrote:Something totally out of their control, but if school ever became year round...

-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Without lengthening the season, what is the advantage of adding 10-15 games at the moment? That's more travel, higher expenses for schools/parents, doing something not in line with other MSHSL sports, and what advantage does it give?northwoods oldtimer wrote:Need to play 35-40 game HS season. 25 games is a total joke. HS season can easily manage 35 game season. GET IT DONE!
You must not know many teachers...silentbutdeadly3139 wrote:Yeah, I see teachers picketing all the time trying to work summers, they hate having summer offIf you don't think the teachers union is powerful, you need to think again. I think most parents would prefer year round school just as they pushed for full time kindergarten because it is very difficult to find summer daycare.
The teacher's unions are quite powerful, no one would dispute that and there are plenty of examples of it, but if they had the control you'd like us to think they do, education around the country would look a lot different than it does in many ways.
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:47 am
I think the mindset needs to BE that hockey is different. What other sport is losing their top/elite athletes to perceived better alternatives like hockey? There's no junior football or basketball.HShockeywatcher wrote:This^green4 wrote:Many teachers are in favor of year round schooling and it would not really be the teachers Unions final decision. Regardless, it seems unlikely they add games to the hockey season unless they extend the seasons length. But they most likely won't extend the seasons length without extending the other sport's seasons too. The best you could hope for I believe is 20 minute periods.MNHockeyFan wrote: The powerful teachers' unions would never go along with this. Instead, I think they should raise the maximum number of regular season games to 30 and play 20 minute periods.
Many nations around the world have about 30 more contact days than the US while about 60% of the contact hours. Change is something many teachers are behind.
I honestly think change is possible if hockey people get out of the mindset that hockey's different and work within the framework that we'd need to make it work for all of the sports.
As is, half of teams are eliminated from playoffs after the first week and some teams sit around for a while before the next season starts. You could easily add a week on the front and back of most seasons. You could further change playoffs to something you have to qualify for and add more. Teams in state may miss the beginning of some seasons. Etc, etc.
Ultimately, the biggest issue I see is being "fair" to spring. A couple of the last 5 springs have seen basically month long seasons. Out of our control but a very real consideration.
-
- Posts: 2679
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:01 pm
Better yet return hockey to the associations that way players don't have to put up with mediocre liberal bias of equal opportunity. Parents don't gripe about 50 games at bantams. Better coaching/development around the state at youth/Bantam level. That would carry into HS if changed. CHANGEHShockeywatcher wrote:Without lengthening the season, what is the advantage of adding 10-15 games at the moment? That's more travel, higher expenses for schools/parents, doing something not in line with other MSHSL sports, and what advantage does it give?northwoods oldtimer wrote:Need to play 35-40 game HS season. 25 games is a total joke. HS season can easily manage 35 game season. GET IT DONE!
You must not know many teachers...silentbutdeadly3139 wrote:Yeah, I see teachers picketing all the time trying to work summers, they hate having summer offIf you don't think the teachers union is powerful, you need to think again. I think most parents would prefer year round school just as they pushed for full time kindergarten because it is very difficult to find summer daycare.
The teacher's unions are quite powerful, no one would dispute that and there are plenty of examples of it, but if they had the control you'd like us to think they do, education around the country would look a lot different than it does in many ways.
IT!
Last edited by northwoods oldtimer on Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
I was at Schwans Arena this weekend and looming all over the complex were 4'x6' signs for AAA hockey. Their big selling point is more games. In Minnesota we're very lucky to still have high school hockey. Most states don't. The talk out there is to be competitive with AAA hockey the MSHSL is going to have to bend or we will start having large scale defections to AAA hockey. Most so called experts outside of this state don't understand how we are still getting away with it. Of course look at the high number of D-1 players we put out and it shuts them up.... for now. More and more of our local skaters have parents who are not hockey traditionalists. If the MSHSl doesn't progress with demand we can expect our current system to change. 

-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
To this comment and the others similar; what does more games accomplish without a longer season?sticksave wrote:I was at Schwans Arena this weekend and looming all over the complex were 4'x6' signs for AAA hockey. Their big selling point is more games. In Minnesota we're very lucky to still have high school hockey. Most states don't. The talk out there is to be competitive with AAA hockey the MSHSL is going to have to bend or we will start having large scale defections to AAA hockey. Most so called experts outside of this state don't understand how we are still getting away with it. Of course look at the high number of D-1 players we put out and it shuts them up.... for now. More and more of our local skaters have parents who are not hockey traditionalists. If the MSHSl doesn't progress with demand we can expect our current system to change.
I have no inside knowledge of anything, but from the way things have been handled in recent years with the MSHSL, the student in student athlete comes first and they aren't going to do things for one sport they aren't doing for others.
If you want these changes and aren't going to address the legitimate issues at play, the changes won't happen.
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
A lot of opinions here... might as well add mine!
Ask any D1 or higher hockey player from Minnesota if high school aged kids should play hockey year-round. I'd be surprised if you can find a single yes. In accordance with that, I think particular care should be taken to allow kids to play separate fall, winter, and spring sports. That could make it difficult to extend the calendar length of the season.
As for games, I think it's only a good idea if we're adding actual hours of ice time. If we're just swapping out games for practice or conditioning time, I don't see the benefit. Also, academic eligibility should NEVER be sacrificed, even though additional hours of ice time will certainly put a strain on homework.
So, in conclusion, I'm all for more ice time (games, practice, length of season, etc.) as long as kids can still play multiple sports and manage their academics.
Ask any D1 or higher hockey player from Minnesota if high school aged kids should play hockey year-round. I'd be surprised if you can find a single yes. In accordance with that, I think particular care should be taken to allow kids to play separate fall, winter, and spring sports. That could make it difficult to extend the calendar length of the season.
As for games, I think it's only a good idea if we're adding actual hours of ice time. If we're just swapping out games for practice or conditioning time, I don't see the benefit. Also, academic eligibility should NEVER be sacrificed, even though additional hours of ice time will certainly put a strain on homework.
So, in conclusion, I'm all for more ice time (games, practice, length of season, etc.) as long as kids can still play multiple sports and manage their academics.
-
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:28 am
I'd be in favor of teams adding in games. A 30 game schedule seems to make sense, and for those teams that have budget/travel issues, they can play 25. It would probably only add another week to the season, as I'm sure most teams could factor in an additional 5 as is.
I've always been in favor of adding games.
I've always been in favor of adding games.
"Virtual high five to chest bump" (MP)