You wanna bet your tonka toys and power rangers on it?Dangler243 wrote:Andover struggled this year. They have a bright spot in the future with freshman goaltender Matt Ray. He has helped the huskies defeat Osseo and Coon Rapids and has kept the huskies to 4 one goal games (Centenial, Champlin(twice), and Anoka. The huskies are not graduating any defensemen and has the #2 ranked bantam A team comming up next year. The huskies have a bright future and will be a force in the coming years.
NW Suburban Conference
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Some would call 4 in a row a dynasty
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:26 pm
Do you actually have any idea what your talking about?hockey talk1 wrote:Blaine should finish on top. Schwartz played well again before catching an unlucky bounce on a wrap around. After losing the shut out opportunity Aus let Thompson play the third because most likely that will be his last period at Varsity for the year. Hollerud and Schwartz are both playing well as the rest of the Bengals team. I don't see how Blaine doesn't win the conference
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:38 pm
[quote="TheCentennialCinco"][quote="hockey talk1"]Blaine should finish on top. Schwartz played well again before catching an unlucky bounce on a wrap around. After losing the shut out opportunity Aus let Thompson play the third because most likely that will be his last period at Varsity for the year. Hollerud and Schwartz are both playing well as the rest of the Bengals team. I don't see how Blaine doesn't win the conference[/quote]
Do you actually have any idea what your talking about?[/quote]
Yes I do know what I'm talking about. Blaine is the better team. You guys had to goals that should have never went in the previous game. Bailey and Beaudette both missed empty netter's. I beleive Blaine out shot centennial and I know they outplayed them.
Do you actually have any idea what your talking about?[/quote]
Yes I do know what I'm talking about. Blaine is the better team. You guys had to goals that should have never went in the previous game. Bailey and Beaudette both missed empty netter's. I beleive Blaine out shot centennial and I know they outplayed them.
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
In addition to out scoring Blaine 5-3, they also out shot them 23-19.hockey talk1 wrote:Yes I do know what I'm talking about. Blaine is the better team. You guys had to goals that should have never went in the previous game. Bailey and Beaudette both missed empty netter's. I beleive Blaine out shot centennial and I know they outplayed them.TheCentennialCinco wrote:Do you actually have any idea what your talking about?hockey talk1 wrote:Blaine should finish on top. Schwartz played well again before catching an unlucky bounce on a wrap around. After losing the shut out opportunity Aus let Thompson play the third because most likely that will be his last period at Varsity for the year. Hollerud and Schwartz are both playing well as the rest of the Bengals team. I don't see how Blaine doesn't win the conference
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:53 pm
Hockey Talker
Blaine beat Centennial in every aspect of the game... except on the scoreboard. Tonights game is too close to call, and a good warm-up for sections. It will be a fun one to watch.
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
Re: Hockey Talker
You guys kill me. Missed empty nets, goalie played bad, every aspect.Bench Major wrote:Blaine beat Centennial in every aspect of the game... except on the scoreboard. Tonights game is too close to call, and a good warm-up for sections. It will be a fun one to watch.

Hey Bench Rider, are you sure Tim Wolford open enrolled? It was my understanding that he moved into the district and dent doesn't show him on the list.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:53 pm
Wolford
Maybe the family had multiple residence?
I'm sure he was probably recruited by the Circle Pines tennis coach anyway. 


-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:26 pm
I assume your referring to the wrap around by Hanzalik, but I don't remember any other goals that "shouldn't have gone in." If the Bengal players aren't athletic enough to stop weak goals then they don't deserve to win. It was a one sided game in favor of Centennial....The stats and score point to that...Hopefully tonight will be more of the samehockey talk1 wrote: Yes I do know what I'm talking about. Blaine is the better team. You guys had to goals that should have never went in the previous game. Bailey and Beaudette both missed empty netter's. I beleive Blaine out shot centennial and I know they outplayed them.

-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:54 pm
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:26 pm
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 10:50 pm
Cinco,
I think you mean a share of the title right? True you did beat Blaine 2 times but those are the only 2 losses in Conference play for Blaine. Anyway I am not gonna get into the whole ref thing the game was played and it ended how it ended we have to live with that, yet your mighty Cougars did lose to Maple Grove and Elk River. There were also 6 one goal victories over other NWSC opponents your Cougars managed to squeek out compared to Blaines 3 one goal over conference opponents. So it would be safe to say over all Blaine is the better team however on 2 nights that you played them the game could have gone either way and it went your way. Looking at the comparisions against confrerence oppenents Blaine showed they had what it took to go out and perform on a more consistant basis against conference oppenents than your Cougars....
I think you mean a share of the title right? True you did beat Blaine 2 times but those are the only 2 losses in Conference play for Blaine. Anyway I am not gonna get into the whole ref thing the game was played and it ended how it ended we have to live with that, yet your mighty Cougars did lose to Maple Grove and Elk River. There were also 6 one goal victories over other NWSC opponents your Cougars managed to squeek out compared to Blaines 3 one goal over conference opponents. So it would be safe to say over all Blaine is the better team however on 2 nights that you played them the game could have gone either way and it went your way. Looking at the comparisions against confrerence oppenents Blaine showed they had what it took to go out and perform on a more consistant basis against conference oppenents than your Cougars....
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
All true. Centennial seemed to want to take nights off in conference games. I dont know if it was because of their tough non-conference schedule or what. Both teams ended up with 19-6 overall records also. Congratulations on your fine season, and good luck in sections.FormerBlaineBengal01 wrote:Cinco,
I think you mean a share of the title right? True you did beat Blaine 2 times but those are the only 2 losses in Conference play for Blaine. Anyway I am not gonna get into the whole ref thing the game was played and it ended how it ended we have to live with that, yet your mighty Cougars did lose to Maple Grove and Elk River. There were also 6 one goal victories over other NWSC opponents your Cougars managed to squeek out compared to Blaines 3 one goal over conference opponents. So it would be safe to say over all Blaine is the better team however on 2 nights that you played them the game could have gone either way and it went your way. Looking at the comparisions against confrerence oppenents Blaine showed they had what it took to go out and perform on a more consistant basis against conference oppenents than your Cougars....
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 10:50 pm
Both teams also played their fair share of other opponents outside the conference, Blaine started the year with Cloquet, Theif River and Roseau and also played Brainered, Wayzata, and Burnsville, of which are very respectable teams, along with Centennial who picked up Morehead twice, Roseville, Holy Angels, Duluth East, and White Bear another group of decent teams. Overall it could be said they both played nearly identical schedules against teams who are very highly ranked in the state and came out with the same overall records. Only difference is the number of goals scored with Blaine posting 117 to Centennials 94. Never a bad thing to have both the High School Hockey Programs in Blaine share for the Conference title. . . The Sectional playoffs should be fun to watch and follow....
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:26 pm
I kind of got that vibe too. They seemed to overlook conference opponents for their games against Moorhead, Roseville, ect....But a win is a win no matter how many goals it's by. Blaine did have more goals on the season but that's to be expected, Centennial was never really expected to put up big points (except for games against NMNeutron 14 wrote:All true. Centennial seemed to want to take nights off in conference games. I dont know if it was because of their tough non-conference schedule or what. Both teams ended up with 19-6 overall records also. Congratulations on your fine season, and good luck in sections.FormerBlaineBengal01 wrote:Cinco,
I think you mean a share of the title right? True you did beat Blaine 2 times but those are the only 2 losses in Conference play for Blaine. Anyway I am not gonna get into the whole ref thing the game was played and it ended how it ended we have to live with that, yet your mighty Cougars did lose to Maple Grove and Elk River. There were also 6 one goal victories over other NWSC opponents your Cougars managed to squeek out compared to Blaines 3 one goal over conference opponents. So it would be safe to say over all Blaine is the better team however on 2 nights that you played them the game could have gone either way and it went your way. Looking at the comparisions against confrerence oppenents Blaine showed they had what it took to go out and perform on a more consistant basis against conference oppenents than your Cougars....

-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
Blaines non conference schedule, and Mitch's rankingFormerBlaineBengal01 wrote:Both teams also played their fair share of other opponents outside the conference, Blaine started the year with Cloquet, Theif River and Roseau and also played Brainered, Wayzata, and Burnsville, of which are very respectable teams, along with Centennial who picked up Morehead twice, Roseville, Holy Angels, Duluth East, and White Bear another group of decent teams. Overall it could be said they both played nearly identical schedules against teams who are very highly ranked in the state and came out with the same overall records. Only difference is the number of goals scored with Blaine posting 117 to Centennials 94. Never a bad thing to have both the High School Hockey Programs in Blaine share for the Conference title. . . The Sectional playoffs should be fun to watch and follow....
Roseau____________L 2-5_____6
Thief River Falls______W 4-3___44
Cloquet____________L 2-4_____7
Robb-Armstrong____ W 8-3____56
vs Wayzata________L 1-2____32
vs Brainerd_________L 1-2____38
vs Burnsville________W 7-3____34
Centennials non conference schedule, and Mitch's ranking
Roseville___________L 3-8____3
White Bear Lake_____L 3-4____9
Duluth East________W 4-2____4
vs Moorhead_______W 4-3____2
vs White Bear Lake__W 5-3____9
Holy Angels________ L 2-8____1
Moorhead__________L 2-3____2
Not even close.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:03 pm
so how does a co-champ affect the NWSC points? Both teams had a great year, but it seems like the blaine fans who say they won in every aspect seem to miss the fact that they had a 5-3 that they couldn't finish. The first goal was a little lucky, but you cant find a prettier one-timer the the snipe that singer had
Singa Snipe!