Your Thoughts On Seeding
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Your Thoughts On Seeding
Now that we've seen 3 of the top 4 seeds go down in the AA tournament, have your thoughts on seeding the top 4 changed?
Last edited by Govs93 on Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:09 pm
- Location: Little Falls
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:49 pm
- Location: fightin in the corner
Yesterday every team that was supposed to win won and today practically the opposite has happened. Yesterday i thought that the seeding was just going to make the first games less interesting to make the final more competitive. Today, i am loving the upsets. I dont think the seeding is really changing things too much; the play throughout the tournament still comes down to how close the field of competition is. 2 tournaments, 2 different examples of what seeding can do... I like it
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:18 am
The more I think about it, I almost wish they would just seed all 8 teams, but then again I sort of like the system in place. I feel like everyone who got to the state hockey tourny is their for a reason, because they had to beat some tough competition, granted some sections can rightfully be argued for being stronger than others. However, in the grand scheme of things, anyone can beet anybody on any given night! It has been shown time and time again, and the MSHSL will never be able to please everyone, because there will always be disagreements over how something turned out. Personally, I feel bad for teams that must carry an extra burden now. They are offically ranked on the tv, and the announcers have to offically call it an upset like the Edina vs. GR game, which just seemed weird considering we don't need rankings usually to determine if the game is a huge upset or not. However, I would not call every game a huge upset either. How knows were this leads us in the future...?i play hockey wrote:Yesterday every team that was supposed to win won and today practically the opposite has happened. Yesterday i thought that the seeding was just going to make the first games less interesting to make the final more competitive. Today, i am loving the upsets. I dont think the seeding is really changing things too much; the play throughout the tournament still comes down to how close the field of competition is. 2 tournaments, 2 different examples of what seeding can do... I like it

Minnesota hockey, the sport of 10,000 memories.
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:18 am
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:55 am
-
- Posts: 3013
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm
-
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:26 pm
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:18 am
Correction 3 of the top 4 ranked teams lost, bc HM, Edina, and Blaine.pipersniper12 wrote:At first I thought the seeding of the top 4 was ridiculous. After today, I think it is alright. Two of the top teams lost. This made all of the games more competitive and a bit closer. I'm not much for blowouts and none of the quarter-final games were, at least not until late in the game.

Minnesota hockey, the sport of 10,000 memories.
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:18 am
Agree, however, it proved the coaches didn't have much faith in GR or section 7AA in general. How sad, when will they ever learn... I mean how can the team who wins section 7AA not be a top 4 seed. Thats a crime in my eyes, Cloquet, DE, ER, GR! Please...but oh well. They saw why its a flawed system here tonight! UPSET CITY 3/4 in AAPASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:Take the seed and flush them didnt prove a thing.



Minnesota hockey, the sport of 10,000 memories.
I don't think the coaches lacked faith in GR. They did not want to be setting the seeding. They collectively seeded them according to the last poll. They probably should have gone 1-8, instead of 1-4. The concept is good, but today shows again that it does not matter what it looks like on paper; the game is played on the ice.Carom Karma wrote:Agree, however, it proved the coaches didn't have much faith in GR or section 7AA in general. How sad, when will they ever learn... I mean how can the team who wins section 7AA not be a top 4 seed. Thats a crime in my eyes, Cloquet, DE, ER, GR! Please...but oh well. They saw why its a flawed system here tonight! UPSET CITY 3/4 in AAPASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:Take the seed and flush them didnt prove a thing.![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 4:28 am
Seedings are pointless
The seedings don't mean anything at all. Not during the playoffs either. Any team can win on any night. What they should do is divide the state tournament up geographically. Have 4 teams represent the north and seed them 1 thru 4 in one bracket. Then the 4 other teams could be the metro side of the bracket and they get seeded 1 thru 4.
Re: Seedings are pointless
What about the southern half?edinahornetz9 wrote:The seedings don't mean anything at all. Not during the playoffs either. Any team can win on any night. What they should do is divide the state tournament up geographically. Have 4 teams represent the north and seed them 1 thru 4 in one bracket. Then the 4 other teams could be the metro side of the bracket and they get seeded 1 thru 4.
Great idea, if you divide the state in half North and South the North has 5 AA teams, Roseau, Moorhead, East, Cloquet and Grand Rapids. And you want 4 of them to make it?
Grand Rapids didn't win 11 of their 28 games coming into the State Tournament plus they were a #3 seed they didn't deserve a top 4 seed.
Grand Rapids didn't win 11 of their 28 games coming into the State Tournament plus they were a #3 seed they didn't deserve a top 4 seed.
Not a bad idea but that does not seem quite fair.goldy313 wrote:Great idea, if you divide the state in half North and South the North has 5 AA teams, Roseau, Moorhead, East, Cloquet and Grand Rapids. And you want 4 of them to make it?
Grand Rapids didn't win 11 of their 28 games coming into the State Tournament plus they were a #3 seed they didn't deserve a top 4 seed.
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:55 am
-
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:27 am
It doesn't seem fair either that there is a possibility of having all metro teams in the AA state and the most out of state teams they would ever have is 3 (1AA,7AA, 8AA). It would be a sad day to see 1 represented by lakeville, 7 represented by elk river, and 8 by buffalo.Fargo wrote:Not a bad idea but that does not seem quite fair.goldy313 wrote:Great idea, if you divide the state in half North and South the North has 5 AA teams, Roseau, Moorhead, East, Cloquet and Grand Rapids. And you want 4 of them to make it?
Grand Rapids didn't win 11 of their 28 games coming into the State Tournament plus they were a #3 seed they didn't deserve a top 4 seed.
do you mean section 1 plays 8, 7 plays 2, etc. cause if thats the case the majority of the years Moorhead or Roseau will have an easy year. Not saying that RC is incabable (as they proved yesterday), but it was the first time this Century that 1AA won in the first roundSTC18 wrote:I really strongly believe they should seed it like sections 1 through 8.