Your Thoughts On Seeding

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

What are your thoughts about seeding the top 4 now?

Like it more after today
18
42%
Like it less after today
10
23%
I think the same as I did yesterday
15
35%
 
Total votes: 43

Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Your Thoughts On Seeding

Post by Govs93 »

Now that we've seen 3 of the top 4 seeds go down in the AA tournament, have your thoughts on seeding the top 4 changed?
Last edited by Govs93 on Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joey (nine toes) Marcoux
Posts: 339
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:13 pm

Post by Joey (nine toes) Marcoux »

Seed them all :!:
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

Not a bit. They got it right.
GopherPuckPlayer
Posts: 808
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:09 pm
Location: Little Falls

Post by GopherPuckPlayer »

It's awesome to see the best of the best, which I believe it was a good move to do!
i play hockey
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:49 pm
Location: fightin in the corner

Post by i play hockey »

Yesterday every team that was supposed to win won and today practically the opposite has happened. Yesterday i thought that the seeding was just going to make the first games less interesting to make the final more competitive. Today, i am loving the upsets. I dont think the seeding is really changing things too much; the play throughout the tournament still comes down to how close the field of competition is. 2 tournaments, 2 different examples of what seeding can do... I like it
Carom Karma
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:18 am

Post by Carom Karma »

i play hockey wrote:Yesterday every team that was supposed to win won and today practically the opposite has happened. Yesterday i thought that the seeding was just going to make the first games less interesting to make the final more competitive. Today, i am loving the upsets. I dont think the seeding is really changing things too much; the play throughout the tournament still comes down to how close the field of competition is. 2 tournaments, 2 different examples of what seeding can do... I like it
The more I think about it, I almost wish they would just seed all 8 teams, but then again I sort of like the system in place. I feel like everyone who got to the state hockey tourny is their for a reason, because they had to beat some tough competition, granted some sections can rightfully be argued for being stronger than others. However, in the grand scheme of things, anyone can beet anybody on any given night! It has been shown time and time again, and the MSHSL will never be able to please everyone, because there will always be disagreements over how something turned out. Personally, I feel bad for teams that must carry an extra burden now. They are offically ranked on the tv, and the announcers have to offically call it an upset like the Edina vs. GR game, which just seemed weird considering we don't need rankings usually to determine if the game is a huge upset or not. However, I would not call every game a huge upset either. How knows were this leads us in the future...? :?
Minnesota hockey, the sport of 10,000 memories.
Fargo
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:19 pm

Post by Fargo »

Joey (nine toes) Marcoux wrote:Seed them all :!:
Ditto - take the last poll where they fall to seed 1-8 and it will make it exciting. Today was awsome. :lol:
Govs93
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Formerly Eastside - now Wayzata area

Post by Govs93 »

Since neither Burnsville nor Grand Rapids were seeded, anybody know how the home team is going to be determined tomorrow? Coin toss?
Carom Karma
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:18 am

Post by Carom Karma »

Govs93 wrote:Since neither Burnsville nor Grand Rapids were seeded, anybody know how the home team is going to be determined tomorrow? Coin toss?
Paper, Rock, Scissors I heard... best two out of three between the team captains! :P :idea: :idea: :idea:
Minnesota hockey, the sport of 10,000 memories.
carpenterguy
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:55 am

Post by carpenterguy »

Rapids will be since they are on top of the bracket.
PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN »

Take the seed and flush them didnt prove a thing.
pipersniper12
Posts: 632
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:26 pm

Post by pipersniper12 »

At first I thought the seeding of the top 4 was ridiculous. After today, I think it is alright. Two of the top teams lost. This made all of the games more competitive and a bit closer. I'm not much for blowouts and none of the quarter-final games were, at least not until late in the game.
Carom Karma
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:18 am

Post by Carom Karma »

pipersniper12 wrote:At first I thought the seeding of the top 4 was ridiculous. After today, I think it is alright. Two of the top teams lost. This made all of the games more competitive and a bit closer. I'm not much for blowouts and none of the quarter-final games were, at least not until late in the game.
Correction 3 of the top 4 ranked teams lost, bc HM, Edina, and Blaine. 8)
Minnesota hockey, the sport of 10,000 memories.
Carom Karma
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:18 am

Post by Carom Karma »

PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:Take the seed and flush them didnt prove a thing.
Agree, however, it proved the coaches didn't have much faith in GR or section 7AA in general. How sad, when will they ever learn... I mean how can the team who wins section 7AA not be a top 4 seed. Thats a crime in my eyes, Cloquet, DE, ER, GR! Please...but oh well. They saw why its a flawed system here tonight! UPSET CITY 3/4 in AA :!: :lol: :P
Minnesota hockey, the sport of 10,000 memories.
Fargo
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:19 pm

Post by Fargo »

Carom Karma wrote:
PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:Take the seed and flush them didnt prove a thing.
Agree, however, it proved the coaches didn't have much faith in GR or section 7AA in general. How sad, when will they ever learn... I mean how can the team who wins section 7AA not be a top 4 seed. Thats a crime in my eyes, Cloquet, DE, ER, GR! Please...but oh well. They saw why its a flawed system here tonight! UPSET CITY 3/4 in AA :!: :lol: :P
I don't think the coaches lacked faith in GR. They did not want to be setting the seeding. They collectively seeded them according to the last poll. They probably should have gone 1-8, instead of 1-4. The concept is good, but today shows again that it does not matter what it looks like on paper; the game is played on the ice.
edinahornetz9
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 4:28 am

Seedings are pointless

Post by edinahornetz9 »

The seedings don't mean anything at all. Not during the playoffs either. Any team can win on any night. What they should do is divide the state tournament up geographically. Have 4 teams represent the north and seed them 1 thru 4 in one bracket. Then the 4 other teams could be the metro side of the bracket and they get seeded 1 thru 4.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Re: Seedings are pointless

Post by wbmd »

edinahornetz9 wrote:The seedings don't mean anything at all. Not during the playoffs either. Any team can win on any night. What they should do is divide the state tournament up geographically. Have 4 teams represent the north and seed them 1 thru 4 in one bracket. Then the 4 other teams could be the metro side of the bracket and they get seeded 1 thru 4.
What about the southern half?
goldy313
Posts: 3949
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 11:56 am

Post by goldy313 »

Great idea, if you divide the state in half North and South the North has 5 AA teams, Roseau, Moorhead, East, Cloquet and Grand Rapids. And you want 4 of them to make it?

Grand Rapids didn't win 11 of their 28 games coming into the State Tournament plus they were a #3 seed they didn't deserve a top 4 seed.
Fargo
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:19 pm

Post by Fargo »

goldy313 wrote:Great idea, if you divide the state in half North and South the North has 5 AA teams, Roseau, Moorhead, East, Cloquet and Grand Rapids. And you want 4 of them to make it?

Grand Rapids didn't win 11 of their 28 games coming into the State Tournament plus they were a #3 seed they didn't deserve a top 4 seed.
Not a bad idea but that does not seem quite fair.
carpenterguy
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:55 am

Post by carpenterguy »

It's a great idea. I think it makes for better drama. Some of the teams come in with a chip on their shoulder because they didn't get a top 4 seed. And some of the top seeds may take the opponent a little lightly. This equals the possibiblity of some so called upsets.
PanthersIn2011
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:27 am

Post by PanthersIn2011 »

Look at the bright side: the consolation bracket is going to be awesome :lol:

They got the seedings right. In the end, the games were decided on the ice, as it should be. And by the goaltenders. Jensen was incredible for GR!
gatzke
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:16 am

Post by gatzke »

Fargo wrote:
goldy313 wrote:Great idea, if you divide the state in half North and South the North has 5 AA teams, Roseau, Moorhead, East, Cloquet and Grand Rapids. And you want 4 of them to make it?

Grand Rapids didn't win 11 of their 28 games coming into the State Tournament plus they were a #3 seed they didn't deserve a top 4 seed.
Not a bad idea but that does not seem quite fair.
It doesn't seem fair either that there is a possibility of having all metro teams in the AA state and the most out of state teams they would ever have is 3 (1AA,7AA, 8AA). It would be a sad day to see 1 represented by lakeville, 7 represented by elk river, and 8 by buffalo.
STC18
Posts: 838
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 1:11 am

Post by STC18 »

I really strongly believe they should seed it like sections 1 through 8.
gatzke
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:16 am

Post by gatzke »

STC18 wrote:I really strongly believe they should seed it like sections 1 through 8.
do you mean section 1 plays 8, 7 plays 2, etc. cause if thats the case the majority of the years Moorhead or Roseau will have an easy year. Not saying that RC is incabable (as they proved yesterday), but it was the first time this Century that 1AA won in the first round
61ache
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Roseau

Post by 61ache »

IMHO seeding only benifits metro teams--they will almost always get the higher ranking. A majority of coaches voting on ranking come from the metro, most of the teams they watch are metro teams, and will only be using an educated guess on ranking teams coming out of 1,7, and 8.
Post Reply