STA vs. MARSHALL
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:35 pm
I want Duluth to take this one...i think they have it. Plus i want to see STA lose a darn game and get shut out from a back to back state chapionship shot. Plus Crandall is just not doing so good...the Orono game at one point he had 3 shots and 2 goals. So they all need to step it up.
Duluth-3 OT
STA-2
Duluth-3 OT
STA-2
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:18 am
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:48 pm
Crandal is the weaker goalie. He is not that good. Announcers are just in love with him becuase they can say his name better.Zamboni Guy wrote:St. Thomas - 1
Duluth Marshall - 0
13:59 left in first period.
Last edited by flatontheice on Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:23 pm
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:57 pm
Good callZamboni Guy wrote:Crandal is the weaker goalie. As the game goes on, you will see. He is not that good.

I will say that I don't think any goalie in this tournament is as good as these commentators make them sound, but I do think Crandall is much better than the kid from DM. If STA could have put some shots on in that period it'd be 4-1. Just watch how far the kid gets sucked to the middle of the net. He leaves the short side open and STA has the idea. They were firing there whenever they had chances but missed high or wide every time. Crandall plays good position and has solid technique and is by far the better goaltender.
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California
That wasn't me who said that...sorry.wolfpack33 wrote:Good callZamboni Guy wrote:Crandal is the weaker goalie. As the game goes on, you will see. He is not that good.![]()
I will say that I don't think any goalie in this tournament is as good as these commentators make them sound, but I do think Crandall is much better than the kid from DM. If STA could have put some shots on in that period it'd be 4-1. Just watch how far the kid gets sucked to the middle of the net. He leaves the short side open and STA has the idea. They were firing there whenever they had chances but missed high or wide every time. Crandall plays good position and has solid technique and is by far the better goaltender.

-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:48 pm
Walters
How did walters old man get that goal changed that fast? Someone at the game...please...is he sitting at the score keepers table?
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: Ontario, California
Nope, no controversy...a simple mis-quote. It was flatontheice who said that Crandal was the weaker goalie.who_b_dat wrote:More controversy for this years tourney. Now we hear that there are 2 Zamboni Guys. It's a conspiracy.
I personally disagree with this statement. I would say that Crandal is a far better goalie than Duluth Marshall's goal keeper.flatontheice wrote:Crandal is the weaker goalie. As the game goes on, you will see. He is not that good.
