Granite City Classic (St. Cloud Dec. 27 - 29)
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Re: tech
thanks man319 wrote:Grant is a very good player. Speed, skill and determination are developing nicely. He needs to grow a little to be a top prospect. (IMO)Dirty Dangler wrote:givememoorehead wrote:what about that grant spanier kid hes quick
That kid gots game.
I like watching him play.
Best team at penalties is what I think he meant?nsideHocKey17 wrote:I think apollo was the best team in the tournement they jus let down the last gamee.
33 penalties for 75 minutes and a Game DQ in 180 minutes of hockey that weekend.

Rogers was the best in the ref’s whistle eye's with 7 penalties for 14 minutes.

Kind of funny how all the top team bracket won the final games?
Would it fair to say that the top was the tougher bracket?
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Waite Park, MN
-
- Posts: 4345
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:27 pm
-
- Posts: 4345
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
- Location: St. Schmo
Size means something to a lot of people. More for d-men than forwards...[gspan] wrote:size doesn't mean crap.
A pretty solid example.
Matt Crandell of the Sioux City Musketeers. Damn good player. Turning in his second solid USHL season.
3rd in the USHL in plus/minus for d-men.
7th in the USHL in points for d-men.
As far as I know, no top-end D-1 offers as of yet. Why? Size.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
The Musketeers have Crandell listed at 5'10" and 190 pounds. Thats not exactly small. What is Ness? Heisenberg has him listed at 5'9" and 155 lbs. Also Chris Student is 5'9" and 160 lbs.George Blanda wrote:Size means something to a lot of people. More for d-men than forwards...[gspan] wrote:size doesn't mean crap.
A pretty solid example.
Matt Crandell of the Sioux City Musketeers. Damn good player. Turning in his second solid USHL season.
3rd in the USHL in plus/minus for d-men.
7th in the USHL in points for d-men.
As far as I know, no top-end D-1 offers as of yet. Why? Size.
How did Carlisle from SCSU get recruited? He CANT be more then 5'8".
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:34 pm
What about Rabouin (sp?) for SCSU or Swanson, who is about 170. Then there are guys in the NHL on the blueline who aren't that big as well, like Keith Ballard of Phoenix. They don't come much more solid in play or in toughness than that kid.
In general size is a factor, better big than small as long as all the skills are there, but there will always be a place in hockey for smaller guys (relatively speaking), who play tough, play bigger than they are and have good skills.
In general size is a factor, better big than small as long as all the skills are there, but there will always be a place in hockey for smaller guys (relatively speaking), who play tough, play bigger than they are and have good skills.
Raboin, just for future reference.zippitydoda wrote:What about Rabouin (sp?) for SCSU or Swanson, who is about 170. Then there are guys in the NHL on the blueline who aren't that big as well, like Keith Ballard of Phoenix. They don't come much more solid in play or in toughness than that kid.
In general size is a factor, better big than small as long as all the skills are there, but there will always be a place in hockey for smaller guys (relatively speaking), who play tough, play bigger than they are and have good skills.

Ben Dover plays BOTH ways.
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
- Location: St. Schmo
You guys did find some smaller defensemen that have made it to a D-1 team. Motzko likes getting offensive defensemen that are smaller.
If you're good enough, like Ness, size doesn't matter. He's an exceptional talent. Ballard is 5'11". Not small, not big.
Smaller D are coming in to the NHL with the new rules...but there aren't that many 5'10" or smaller D in the NHL. I'd say less than 15 D in the NHL are 5'10" or smaller.
If you're good enough, like Ness, size doesn't matter. He's an exceptional talent. Ballard is 5'11". Not small, not big.
Smaller D are coming in to the NHL with the new rules...but there aren't that many 5'10" or smaller D in the NHL. I'd say less than 15 D in the NHL are 5'10" or smaller.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
Is that with the extra inch or two they give you to pad your stats?George Blanda wrote:You guys did find some smaller defensemen that have made it to a D-1 team. Motzko likes getting offensive defensemen that are smaller.
If you're good enough, like Ness, size doesn't matter. He's an exceptional talent. Ballard is 5'11". Not small, not big.
Smaller D are coming in to the NHL with the new rules...but there aren't that many 5'10" or smaller D in the NHL. I'd say less than 15 D in the NHL are 5'10" or smaller.
It makes you wonder alittle what could have been, if Matt had stayed and helped the Crusaders make it to state. I think he would have put them over the edge.
RLStars wrote:you must be buddies with oldtimer then?George Blanda wrote:Size means something to a lot of people. More for d-men than forwards...[gspan] wrote:size doesn't mean crap.
A pretty solid example.
Matt Crandell of the Sioux City Musketeers. Damn good player. Turning in his second solid USHL season.
3rd in the USHL in plus/minus for d-men.
7th in the USHL in points for d-men.
ha i love matt though, i play travel soccer in the summer with him
I'd call you a tool, but even THEY serve a purpose
Would you please do all of us the favor of refraining from making these stupid unintelligent remarks about Apollo. We all know you play for Apollo and all of us have our own little high school pride but honestly get the picture. Apollo is not as good as you have them cracked up to be. So with that being said, please make educated opinions with a little factual information to back up your opinions and not just completly stupid ones.ya they didnt try against bismark.
_____________
illiterate Plug!
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Waite Park, MN
Donkey9 wrote:Would you please do all of us the favor of refraining from making these stupid unintelligent remarks about Apollo. We all know you play for Apollo and all of us have our own little high school pride but honestly get the picture. Apollo is not as good as you have them cracked up to be. So with that being said, please make educated opinions with a little factual information to back up your opinions and not just completly stupid ones.ya they didnt try against bismark.
your name is donkey.
_____________
illiterate Plug!
My name may be donkey, but your the ass (refering to a stubborn mule) that forgot to close the quote brackets before trying to take a stab at me. Well played though.nsideHocKey17
Donkey9 wrote:
Quote:
ya they didnt try against bismark.
Would you please do all of us the favor of refraining from making these stupid unintelligent remarks about Apollo. We all know you play for Apollo and all of us have our own little high school pride but honestly get the picture. Apollo is not as good as you have them cracked up to be. So with that being said, please make educated opinions with a little factual information to back up your opinions and not just completly stupid ones.
your name is donkey.
_____________
illiterate Plug!
________________
Public School Plug!