Section 3A

flameofshame69 · Post by **flameofshame69** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:50 pm

Does it really matter 3A everybody in this section is garbage. When the state tournament starts this section will be totally irrelevant. You'll lose the first one 12-0 or 12-1 then you'll go over to the U and lose 8-0 or 8-1 sending you home. I saw better JV teams in northern MN then any of 3A teams. So stop posting all you 3A people and stop wasting your time

Thegoldenjet · Post by **Thegoldenjet** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:55 pm

You're an idiot.

flameofshame69 · Post by **flameofshame69** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:39 pm

And this section is still garbage too bad the high school league screwed this up

sick_dangles08 · Post by **sick_dangles08** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:03 pm

well when new ulm played albert lea, albert lea had 11 players out for grades.. im just throwing that out there...

minnhockey33 · Post by **minnhockey33** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:12 pm

sick_dangles08 wrote:well when new ulm played albert lea, albert lea had 11 players out for grades.. im just throwing that out there...

Albert Lea really started to play some great hockey around christmas and it's been uphill for them since..At this point i think they are playing the best they have in a long time

puuck · Post by **puuck** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:34 pm

New Ulm lost to both Marshall and Willmar, barely beat winless Austin by 2, Marshall just beat them by 4. They did beat Fairmont, way to go.
One line and no "D" that I have seen.

SC.elite918 · Post by **SC.elite918** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:33 pm

I no for a fact that Albert Lea had all their players against New Ulm Because i have spoken to the Albert Lea coach. And Marshall also tied Windom who New Ulm beat i believe

HockeytownUSA · Post by **HockeytownUSA** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:59 pm

is that all you got elite? how about some more sweet stats about how good new ulm is? they are obviously the best team in the section by far right?

bombsquad06 · Post by **bombsquad06** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:23 pm

We'll see who's better after Thursday night!

SC.elite918 · Post by **SC.elite918** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:48 pm

Here is another fun fact for you i got off the Shattuck web page. The team New Ulm just lost to went up to Canada the next weekend to play Fort Francis
They also played Duluth Marshall Varsity and beat them 3 to 1.

puuck · Post by **puuck** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:57 pm

Did they beat Fort Francis? They lost to them earlier in the month. So that makes New Ulm good? Thats not even Shattucks best team.

SC.elite918 · Post by **SC.elite918** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:03 pm

I believe they split with them and no that does not make New Ulm good but they wanted more stats. So what if its not shattucks best team its the one who beat Duluth and New Ulm

RLStars · Post by **RLStars** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:23 pm

SC.elite918 wrote:I believe they split with them and no that does not make New Ulm good but they wanted more stats. So what if its not shattucks best team its the one who beat Duluth and New Ulm

It was a scrimmage against DM.

mnhockey09 · Post by **mnhockey09** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:01 pm

even if it was just a scrimmage new ulm only lost 4-0 and shattuck had 1 short handed goal and scored one with 12 seconds left just some other info on the game. Any other predictions for the new ulm-marshal game thursday?

Innocentbystander · Post by **Innocentbystander** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:08 pm

Also the team New Ulm played from Shattuck beat St. Thomas Acadamy. So its not like the team new ulm played wasn't very good. but Thursday should be a good game.

Thegoldenjet · Post by **Thegoldenjet** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:22 pm

Ya think?

RLStars · Post by **RLStars** » Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:47 am

Innocentbystander wrote:Also the team New Ulm played from Shattuck beat St. Thomas Acadamy. So its not like the team new ulm played wasn't very good. but Thursday should be a good game.

I don't think it was St. Thomas Academy in MN. The schedule just states St. Thomas. The date it was played was Jan 13th. The MSHSL will not allow a HS team to play or practice on a Sunday.

minnhockey33 · Post by **minnhockey33** » Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:43 am

RLStars wrote:
Innocentbystander wrote:Also the team New Ulm played from Shattuck beat St. Thomas Acadamy. So its not like the team new ulm played wasn't very good. but Thursday should be a good game.
I don't think it was St. Thomas Academy in MN. The schedule just states St. Thomas. The date it was played was Jan 13th. The MSHSL will not allow a HS team to play or practice on a Sunday.

Very true, and there was nothing of this sort on St Thomas Academy's schedule, therefore i don't think it was them.

justplay22 · Post by **justplay22** » Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:22 pm

Marsahall 5
New Ulm 3

flameofshame69 · Post by **flameofshame69** » Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:25 pm

How does this thread have 15 pages it doesn't take that long to talk about how you are gonna lose in the state tournament

minnhockey33 · Post by **minnhockey33** » Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:36 pm

flameofshame69 wrote:How does this thread have 15 pages it doesn't take that long to talk about how you are gonna lose in the state tournament

You could probably type this in 6 other section threads too, because well, I would say roughly 7 out of 8 teams in the class A state tournament will in fact lose at least one time during the state tournament.

mnhockey09 · Post by **mnhockey09** » Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:31 pm

minnhockey33 wrote:
flameofshame69 wrote:How does this thread have 15 pages it doesn't take that long to talk about how you are gonna lose in the state tournament
You could probably type this in 6 other section threads too, because well, I would say roughly 7 out of 8 teams in the class A state tournament will in fact lose at least one time during the state tournament.

Ya he does have a good point haha and i dont see why you guys have to come in these threads and bash this section. We have things we like to dicuss about the teams in 3a so just stay out of our thread and go talk up your team in your own thread if there so damn good.

Innocentbystander · Post by **Innocentbystander** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:47 pm

New Ulm 9
Marshall 0

Marshall had 10 shots on net after the 2nd period...New Ulm had 37

RLStars · Post by **RLStars** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:56 pm

Willmar 4
Sauk Rapids 5

mnhockey09 · Post by **mnhockey09** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:40 pm

New Ulm played well tonight. shots were 51-18 and running time whole 3rd period.