Hope fully tour tourneys are decided by a play like this
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
ndhockeyrep
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:12 pm
post 10140
hockeywatcher4 wrote:did they count the goal?
Yes they did, but I am tired of people saying it cost Grand Forks Red River a title. They had three overtimes to just score and make it irrelevant and they couldn't do it. Also, the six guys had nothing to do with the goal. Yes, it still wasn't legal, but that goal likely would have been scored with five guys on the ice.
-
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:54 pm
Re: post 10140
boblee wrote:hockeywatcher4 wrote:did they count the goal?
Yes they did, but I am tired of people saying it cost Grand Forks Red River a title. They had three overtimes to just score and make it irrelevant and they couldn't do it. Also, the six guys had nothing to do with the goal. Yes, it still wasn't legal, but that goal likely would have been scored with five guys on the ice.
-
ndhockeyrep
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:12 pm
-
newSPUDfan
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:15 pm
post 10142
Just watch it and you'll see what I am saying. Or maybe you won't actually. He came on thinking someone else was coming off. The guy who ended up not coming off had nothing to do with the play. Nothing at all. Plus out of the six guys on the ice how many touch the puck?ndhockeyrep wrote:Im neither a GFRR or GPR fan but how can you say that they woudl ascored wiht 5 guys o the ice when the 6th man that came off the bench scored? lmao
-
east hockey
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
Re: Hope fully tour tourneys are decided by a play like this
This is the Minnesota high school hockey forum, not North Dakota.ndhockeyrep wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZ0gxs2m350
Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky