Preseason Predictions for Section 3A

sick_dangles08 · Post by **sick_dangles08** » Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:08 pm

Puckyeah1 wrote:New Ulm wins last night vs. St. peter 5-2, reinarts 2 goals, sophomore Kaleb Juntunen steps up with 2 goals..They are my pick for sections this year. Solid group of sophomores and returners.

I wouldn't be so sure of that... I think someone from this section beat them already this year. I'm not sure though.

wild4hockey9 · Post by **wild4hockey9** » Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:34 pm

Puckyeah1 wrote:
New Ulm wins last night vs. St. peter 5-2, reinarts 2 goals, sophomore Kaleb Juntunen steps up with 2 goals..They are my pick for sections this year. Solid group of sophomores and returners.

ya um new ulm got beat pretty good by Hutch this year already 4-1

Puckyeah1 · Post by **Puckyeah1** » Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:07 pm

New Ulm got spanked by Marshall last year early in the season 7-1, beat them 9-0, and 7-3, in their next two meetings, New Ulm also beat Litchfield early in the season last year, and lost the section finals. They may have already been beat but they are still my pick. They have the most depth in their returning seniors, and a very good group of sophomores, they are going to make some noise this year and hopefully stick it out come section time.

BSU93 · Post by **BSU93** » Sat Dec 06, 2008 12:29 am

Who the hell are these sophomores I've been hearing about, I havnt seen PLEASE BAN ME yet from there sophomores, let alone I dont know who the hell they are...

Koolice · Post by **Koolice** » Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:06 am

I've seen there sophmores play last year in bantams a few times. They have no real standouts but are a solid group of kids that play well together. But i don't know if its enough for them to win the Sec.

Puckyeah1 · Post by **Puckyeah1** » Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:43 pm

Some of their sophomores have been on select hockey teams over the past few summers, and one even played elite II. Their bantam years have held strong records, and competed late in their regional tournaments. People say that New Ulm will be bad every year, and every year they prove you wrong. Come to terms with the fact that most of the time, they are better than your pick...and give them a little respect.

BSU93 · Post by **BSU93** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:05 am

Elitle II is trash if you have to money and time to play it you can be in it

Puckyeah1 · Post by **Puckyeah1** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:38 am

Ohh, so you mean in tryouts, when they TRYOUT, they really aren't trying out? Explain your reasoning....

BSU93 · Post by **BSU93** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:41 pm

If you have the money and the time to do it and can skate like a normal person you can be in elite II

breakthestreak · Post by **breakthestreak** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:24 pm

Koolice wrote:I've seen there sophmores play last year in bantams a few times. They have no real standouts but are a solid group of kids that play well together. But i don't know if its enough for them to win the Sec.

That isn't true I watched them last year at the hermantown tournament and they had a couple standouts,but i don't know their names. number 16 and 11 caught my attention and also my friend Chuck Spruso the head coach of a lower jr team out west in canada

breakthestreak · Post by **breakthestreak** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:26 pm

BSU93 wrote:Elitle II is trash if you have to money and time to play it you can be in it

It isn't trash it's a good way to bring underclassmen into improving their hockey skills, sort of like any jr. gold teams

breakthestreak · Post by **breakthestreak** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:39 pm

jackstraw

Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 226

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:01 pm Post subject: ?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is Juntenun #16 for New Ulm and doesn't he DangleallDay? If it is the player I am thinking of he is a much improved player from a year ago.

Thanks straw,so 16 is Juntenun and 11 is undetermind

danglepastdmen · Post by **danglepastdmen** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:53 pm

BSU, tell that to the 60 kids who didnt make the team.

BSU93 · Post by **BSU93** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 7:05 pm

Jr. Gold is like the worst thing you could be on haha if you get cut from JV and play Jr. Gold you should quit because you suck, and when NU played Hutch I didnt see any kid that could dangle?

danglepastdmen · Post by **danglepastdmen** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 7:40 pm

BSU93 wrote:Jr. Gold is like the worst thing you could be on haha if you get cut from JV and play Jr. Gold you should quit because you suck, and when NU played Hutch I didnt see any kid that could dangle?

but did ypu watch the st peter game? 1st game jitters can do alot

sick_dangles08 · Post by **sick_dangles08** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:58 pm

danglepastdmen wrote:
BSU93 wrote:Jr. Gold is like the worst thing you could be on haha if you get cut from JV and play Jr. Gold you should quit because you suck, and when NU played Hutch I didnt see any kid that could dangle?
but did ypu watch the st peter game? 1st game jitters can do alot

Yeah, so can playing against a terrible team. That usually helps out.

Puckyeah1 · Post by **Puckyeah1** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:46 am

good team, terrible team, the goal goes on the score sheet, he earned the goals, he put the puck in the net, that takes some talent... if he keeps putting pucks in the net doesnt that make him an asset to the team? A strong asset considering you need goals to win a game...

letsgowild · Post by **letsgowild** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:11 am

I agree you need players who can score.

sick_dangles08 · Post by **sick_dangles08** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:38 am

Puckyeah1 wrote:good team, terrible team, the goal goes on the score sheet, he earned the goals, he put the puck in the net, that takes some talent... if he keeps putting pucks in the net doesnt that make him an asset to the team? A strong asset considering you need goals to win a game...

There has been two games??? You talk like he should be the captain or something... Did he score in the first one? I guess we will have to see how he pans out, but I'm assuming that he wont be much of an asset to his team, unless of course they are playing against bad teams when everyone is an asset.

1HOCK1 · Post by **1HOCK1** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:02 pm

Hes not that good.

Koolice · Post by **Koolice** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:27 pm

Its been 2 games you can't tell me that this player is that good after 2 games. Give it some time, lets see if anything happens down the road. There must be some other good players on NU as well. What about good players on other teams in the sec? There must be some, who are they?

BSU93 · Post by **BSU93** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 5:37 pm

Mitchell Cowger Hutch he's 6th leading scorer in the state and Kyle Reinharts NU he is a very fast kid, strong on his skates, great shot and not afraid to take the body. Nate Adams Litchfields best player great shot, strong on his skates, he's about 6'4 so hes a big mofo and he's not afraid to take the body also

Puckyeah1 · Post by **Puckyeah1** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 5:42 pm

Cody Kohn for NU is a strong defenseman, this is his 4th varsity year. Kyle Reinarts, Thomas Novak, also Sr. foreward, quick, smart with the puck, and works very hard.

danglepastdmen · Post by **danglepastdmen** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:07 pm

Puckyeah1 wrote:good team, terrible team, the goal goes on the score sheet, he earned the goals, he put the puck in the net, that takes some talent... if he keeps putting pucks in the net doesnt that make him an asset to the team? A strong asset considering you need goals to win a game...

he scored two goals in that game, 1st one was a snipe short side.it powered their team,he was taking the role of a leader

danglepastdmen · Post by **danglepastdmen** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:22 pm

BSU93 wrote:If you have the money and the time to do it and can skate like a normal person you can be in elite II

sounds like somebody diidn't make elite II's