Sartell-St Stephen (10-5) @ Little Falls (14-0) 1-27-09

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:24 am

The first meeting was a one goal win for Little Falls. Sartell-St Stephen had a few tough losses, but will be riding an 8 game win streak into this game.

MNHockey75 · Post by **MNHockey75** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:23 am

I expect a different game this time around.

Sartell - 1
Little Falls - 6

hockeyOAF · Post by **hockeyOAF** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:51 am

My upset of the week, LFalls loses it's first, there next loss will be in the playoffs
Hanowski doesn't get 5+ points tonight
Sabres 4 Flyers 3

RLStars · Post by **RLStars** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:30 am

Sartell has two hotheads on the team that need to stay out of the box if they want to compete with LF. IF LF can get in those two's head, it'll be a blowout, if not, its just another nice win for the Flyers.

LF 6
Sartell 3

ap4mvp · Post by **ap4mvp** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:01 am

The Flyers are on a 41 game unbeaten streak at the Exchange Arena! I think they take this one easily!

Little Falls 6
Sartell 2

EZgoalscorer · Post by **EZgoalscorer** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:27 am

I think this game will be a different story then last time. Firstly LF has just been to tough to beat at home, I realize every team has a slip up here and there but I don't think it will be tomorrow night. Secondly it seems LF has found a way to stay out of the box lately, if thats the case it's going to be tough for anyone to beat them.

Little Falls 6

Sartell 2

gophers101 · Post by **gophers101** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:32 am

If the Flyers are going to lose its going to be this game. They could possibly lose against St. Cloud Tech but I see Sartell pulling this one out in a high scoring affair.

Flyers-4
Sabres-5

sticks · Post by **sticks** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:42 am

Sabres-5
LF-3

The Sabres have been playing well as of late, and a loss for the boys in purple wouldn't be the worst thing right now.

jmann32083 · Post by **jmann32083** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:23 pm

Im going to pick LF in a close one 3-2 with Hanowski getting points on all three goals. If little falls comes out flat in the first period it might go the other way but i dont see that happening well see tomorrow night

joester · Post by **joester** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:20 pm

I go LF 6 Sabres 2

WendyClark · Post by **WendyClark** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:51 pm

Small Falls by a few and somebody other than Mr. Hockey playing a big role in this game

GopherPuckPlayer · Post by **GopherPuckPlayer** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:04 am

I am going with LF and their unbeaten streak at home with a 5-2 victory.

Stealth · Post by **Stealth** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:31 am

2 to 1 Sartell

The Vet · Post by **The Vet** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:31 pm

I'm loving the comment on the Flyers' win streak at home. If anyone is expecting an upset, tonight is not the night. Anytime they play at home, as long as there are fans in the stands, they will win. Flyers win at home and extend the streak.

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:48 pm

sartell by 1

Bigfan · Post by **Bigfan** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:18 pm

LF 3-1 over Sartell 4:30 left in the 2 period. Ben Hano. with three goals
on the night. Shots 13-7 in favor of Sartell.

gophers101 · Post by **gophers101** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:26 pm

Why don't the Sabres just triple team Hanowski. He's the only one that scores. I guess beating up on lowly teams such and getting 3 goals is a huge accomplishment.

Bigfan · Post by **Bigfan** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:49 pm

Flyers 6-1 3 goals scored in 1:02 in the 3 period, Moll, Gosiak and Hirsch scoring. The game seems to be getting a little chippy. Sartell scores 6-2 the score 10:09 left in the game.

defense · Post by **defense** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:55 pm

Bigfan wrote:Flyers 6-1 3 goals scored in 1:02 in the 2 period, Moll, Gosiak and Hirsch scoring. The game seems to be getting a little chippy.

You must have misspelled Hanowski, I don't know how it is spelled but it sure isn't anything like : Moll, Gosiak, or Hirsch, .....get it right Hanowski is the ONLY player on the team, and definitely the ONLY one who scores, .....right gophers101???????

Bigfan · Post by **Bigfan** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:03 pm

Big Ben just scored again 7-2

scarface · Post by **scarface** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:20 pm

Bigfan wrote:LF 3-1 over Sartell 4:30 left in the 2 period. Ben Hano. with three goals
on the night. Shots 13-7 in favor of Sartell.

So Hano has 4 goals.....how many assists? Since Sartell has the shot advantage, clearly Hano isn't the only contributor. Sperl must be standing on his head again stopping 11 shots so far!!!

People beat up on LF for their schedule and some of it is deserved but they are a decent team and it doesn't just begin and end with Ben Hanowski. Looking forward to the Section tourney!!!!!

EZgoalscorer · Post by **EZgoalscorer** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:17 pm

scarface wrote:
Bigfan wrote:LF 3-1 over Sartell 4:30 left in the 2 period. Ben Hano. with three goals
on the night. Shots 13-7 in favor of Sartell.
So Hano has 4 goals.....how many assists? Since Sartell has the shot advantage, clearly Hano isn't the only contributor. Sperl must be standing on his head again stopping 11 shots so far!!!

People beat up on LF for their schedule and some of it is deserved but they are a decent team and it doesn't just begin and end with Ben Hanowski. Looking forward to the Section tourney!!!!!

Hanowski 4 goals 1 assist

MNHockey75 · Post by **MNHockey75** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:15 am

Final shots: 26-21 LF

PP: LF 1/2, S 1/4

LF:
G - Hanowski (4), Moll, Gosiak, Hirsch
A - Hirsch (2), Moll, Waytashek, Berglund, Gosiak, Kalis, Hanowski
Sperl, 19 saves

S:
G - M. Nahan, Husmann
A - Rassmussen, Zierden
Orndof, 13 saves/Nelson, 6 saves

Mite-dad · Post by **Mite-dad** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:05 am

I thought Sartell looked pretty darn good through 2 periods. I thought they were very physical. They just don't have quite enough offensive punch. I thought they kept LF out of sync for 2 periods with Hano keeping LF in the lead. They had a very effective forecheck and made it difficult for LF to get it into their end efficiently. They also finished their checks well. LF clearly won the third. I think Sartell could be tough in sections.

defense · Post by **defense** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:28 pm

Mite-dad wrote:I thought Sartell looked pretty darn good through 2 periods. I thought they were very physical. They just don't have quite enough offensive punch. I thought they kept LF out of sync for 2 periods with Hano keeping LF in the lead. They had a very effective forecheck and made it difficult for LF to get it into their end efficiently. They also finished their checks well. LF clearly won the third. I think Sartell could be tough in sections.

I am very agreeable to that notion.....there could be some surprises..

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Sartell-St Stephen (10-5) @ Little Falls (14-0) 1-27-09

Who wins Tuesday?

Sartell-St Stephen (10-5) @ Little Falls (14-0) 1-27-09

I dont see little falls losing this one.