Preseason Predictions for Section 3A

sregit34 · Post by **sregit34** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am

Dangle4life wrote:Both teams played pretty well.. Redwood came out hitting..shots were around 25- 28...

Hope all is well with number 5.... I beileve he broke his wrist in a few places

yeah redwood came out firing. Although were very stupid and took alot of penalties and honestly probably should have got more. they got extremely lucky that marshall has trouble putting the puck in the net.

Koolice · Post by **Koolice** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:33 pm

How close was the willmar game last night? Looks like Hutch got beat pretty bad, and NU beat an easy team. Is NU making a move for the #1 seed? I still like Hutch but that could change.

iced_out99 · Post by **iced_out99** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 5:04 pm

Koolice wrote:How close was the willmar game last night? Looks like Hutch got beat pretty bad, and NU beat an easy team. Is NU making a move for the #1 seed? I still like Hutch but that could change.

Alexandria 4
Willmar 2

New Ulm 8
Northfield 1

Red Wing 6
Hutch 1

goalieguy_14 · Post by **goalieguy_14** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:37 pm

Marshall is number one. seriously. marshall is a darkhorse i wouldnt be surprised if they took this thing. They can play with anyone and seeing how inconsistent everyone is its all open.[/quote]

Is Marshal still your dark horse? Losing to Redwood? wow...

sregit34 · Post by **sregit34** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:33 pm

sregit34 wrote:
Dangle4life wrote:Both teams played pretty well.. Redwood came out hitting..shots were around 25- 28...

Hope all is well with number 5.... I beileve he broke his wrist in a few places
yeah redwood came out firing. Although were very stupid and took alot of penalties and honestly probably should have got more. they got extremely lucky that marshall has trouble putting the puck in the net.

i believe actually it was #14 who broke his wrist on Marshall. He broke it in 4 places i believe

hock99 · Post by **hock99** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:29 pm

If marshall could of put the puck in the net with those godsent powerplay opportunities for the majority of the 2nd period they would have easily one.

Puckyeah1 · Post by **Puckyeah1** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:40 pm

hutch beats new prague then gets whooped by red wing?? anyone info on the game?

Ducks09 · Post by **Ducks09** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:29 pm

true hock99....rediculous 5-3 for 5 minutes and no goals....game summarized

iced_out99 · Post by **iced_out99** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:35 pm

Ducks09 wrote:true hock99....rediculous 5-3 for 5 minutes and no goals....game summarized

I heard that marshall actually did put one away but the net was off or something....is that true?

TriedThat2 · Post by **TriedThat2** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:38 am

I can't believe this is EIGHT pages long! It could be summarized in one page, one and done.

sregit34 · Post by **sregit34** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:08 am

If marshall and Redwood play in sections. Marshall will not only kick their a$$ but they will burn down there houses and steal their women. woooh woooh.!!!!

sregit34 · Post by **sregit34** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am

Oh yeah and they are gonna make them scream and beg for mercy as they are systematically destroyed.

letsgowild · Post by **letsgowild** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:58 pm

any updates on scores tonight

PoNd HocKey ChAmP67 · Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:04 am

Hutch beat Northfield 3-0.

Shots
Hutch 19
Northfield 22

Koolice · Post by **Koolice** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:47 am

Hutch beat Nothfeld 3 - 0, didn't NU beat Northfield 8 - 1 on Tuesday? Willmar lost to Brainard 5 - 2. Maybe NU is making a move for the #1 seed. With the record that Wilmar has ( under 500 ) I think it would be hard to give them the top seed, so its down to Hutch and NU. Who will play there best down the stretch?

hock1 · Post by **hock1** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:01 pm

first of all sregit34 needs to get over the fact that his team sucks. It's obvious you play for marshall cuz all you do is talk them up. Stop listening to your coach tell you guys that anything can happen and you can beat anyone if you put your mind to it. You can't. If you wanna prove to me that you belong in this section, then beat New Ulm when they come to your barn on thursday. Until then shut up. Anyways... i agree, it's gonna more than likely come down to NU and Hutch for the top seed. Willmar needs a better record. Hutch and NU could reach 20 wins. I don't know how Hutch only won 3-0, but they seem to be slipping. NU is blowing people out night after night. Part of that is due to their easy schedule, but they are still playing good. A week ago i had Hutch at number 1, now it's New ulm.

Puckyeah1 · Post by **Puckyeah1** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:30 pm

very true on both cases, new ulm has an easier schedule than they used to, but its obvious considering the scores, they are still my pick. Unless there is an upset, which may happen in both cases, i see New Ulm vs. Hutch finals, New Ulm taking the trip
bring on the hate..

Puckyeah1 · Post by **Puckyeah1** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:12 pm

sregit34, come on...be realistic here, marshall wont even go past round one of sections..bad seed=hutch, new ulm, or willmar first round. your done.

hock1 · Post by **hock1** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:22 pm

Puckyeah1 wrote:sregit34, come on...be realistic here, marshall wont even go past round one of sections..bad seed=hutch, new ulm, or willmar first round. your done.

amen to that!!!! so true. So seedings are just a couple weeks away and here's how i got it:
1. New Ulm= good record-partly in fact to the weaker schedule- but nonetheless on fire. As long as they win the games they should the rest of the year (@litch, @Marshall, @ dodge county) then they could get the #1. PLus that huge senior class should lead well come playoffs.
2. Hutch= good schedule, but flopping as of late. The thing they got going for them that could ride them through the playoffs is good goaltending as of late. But they seem to be struggling against the teams that NU has killed so that's why they are #2
3. Willmar= they did beat hutch, that's good, but they have a poor record.They need to find scoring in order to go all the way
4. Redwood Falls= i can't believe i'm saying this, but they are the best of the very worst right now. But will not go far.
5. Marshall= stop running your mouths and shut up. You might be able to beat redwood in the playoffs, but that's it. So quit thinking your in the big boys league, cuz your not.
6. Luverne= need to find more scoring other than paquette.
7. Litchfield= needs more scoring and more consistancy. You can't lose to Marshall and expect to do anything come playoffs.
8. Windom= i don't know why. From here on down i'm just guessing.
9. Worthington= one and done
10. Fairmont= needs some talent...sometime in this century.
11. Sleepy Eye= Is there another sport your town is good at? Cuz if there is then try and stick to that, cuz you got nothing going in this sport. It's like watching a bunch of squirts slapping the puck around.

iced_out99 · Post by **iced_out99** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:33 pm

hock1 wrote:
Puckyeah1 wrote:sregit34, come on...be realistic here, marshall wont even go past round one of sections..bad seed=hutch, new ulm, or willmar first round. your done.
amen to that!!!! so true. So seedings are just a couple weeks away and here's how i got it:
1. New Ulm= good record-partly in fact to the weaker schedule- but nonetheless on fire. As long as they win the games they should the rest of the year (@litch, @Marshall, @ dodge county) then they could get the #1. PLus that huge senior class should lead well come playoffs.
2. Hutch= good schedule, but flopping as of late. The thing they got going for them that could ride them through the playoffs is good goaltending as of late. But they seem to be struggling against the teams that NU has killed so that's why they are #2
3. Willmar= they did beat hutch, that's good, but they have a poor record.They need to find scoring in order to go all the way
4. Redwood Falls= i can't believe i'm saying this, but they are the best of the very worst right now. But will not go far.
5. Marshall= stop running your mouths and shut up. You might be able to beat redwood in the playoffs, but that's it. So quit thinking your in the big boys league, cuz your not.
6. Luverne= need to find more scoring other than paquette.
7. Litchfield= needs more scoring and more consistancy. You can't lose to Marshall and expect to do anything come playoffs.
8. Windom= i don't know why. From here on down i'm just guessing.
9. Worthington= one and done
10. Fairmont= needs some talent...sometime in this century.
11. Sleepy Eye= Is there another sport your town is good at? Cuz if there is then try and stick to that, cuz you got nothing going in this sport. It's like watching a bunch of squirts slapping the puck around.

You do know that some kids play hockey to have fun. Sleepy Eye may be horrible but at least they try and have some fun doing it. You dont have to be the best in the state or section to play. So just cool out bud.

Ducks09 · Post by **Ducks09** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:40 pm

That kid doesnt have a cool down button....he talks like hes gretzky. so quit running your mouth so much.. -k?

Bdangles14 · Post by **Bdangles14** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:30 pm

really shut the hell up hock1

Bdangles14 · Post by **Bdangles14** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:33 pm

my money is on hutch to win sections and seems like new ulm kids on this are getting pretty cocky and i think they will go into that game thinking theyr the top dog of the section and i got hutchinson beating them by 3 in sections if they meet up

eaglescout06 · Post by **eaglescout06** » Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:07 pm

FYI:I heard that the NU coach told the players to stay off this site. So prob not players from NU. As far as top dogs, Hutch beat NU right. I hope they wouldn't be cockey about getting beat.

Koolice · Post by **Koolice** » Tue Feb 03, 2009 5:52 pm

Right now my money is still on Hutch, they play better teams and have a good record. But I think NU has closed the gap. I hope the top teams play there best come playoff time so we can see some good games.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Preseason Predictions for Section 3A

3a