Wisconsin vs Minnesota

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Better

minnesota
44
96%
wisconsin
2
4%
 
Total votes: 46

JSR
Posts: 1673
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:26 pm

Post by JSR »

O-townClown wrote:Obviously the Minnesota list is going to be about the same every year. Not the names, but the team strength. Like Canada's team for the World Juniors.

Do you feel this group from Wisconsin is a really good group coming through, or is it like this every year?

Yes, the OHL is a peg above the USHL. That said, you are picking guys that are simply on the teams and not setting the world on fire. (Don't take this the wrong way.) Are middle-of-the-pack guys there better than the upper-end of the USHL? No. Ambroz - and others - could play up there too.

Sure you want to list Batcha? One point this year in the USHL.
To answer your first question, I actually think this WI group is average to slightly above average for WI. I have seen years where there has been better and deeper talent and I have also seen years where it's been worse. Because WI doesn't have the aformentioned yearly depth it can be a bit "cardiac" so to speak from year to year but I'd call this a good group, deeper defensively than some years but not as good offensively so it evens out I guess.

I agree Ambrosz and others could play up there too. However, how would a middle of the pack guy in the OHL (since it is a notch above) do in the USHL. It's hard to say because we haven't seen those exact players play in both. I know when Racino as an example played for TW, H.S. and AAA mm he lit it up everywhere he went so I know he is pretty darn good, so tough to say how he'd do in USHL but I suspect he'd do well, just a hunch though.

As for Batcha, I listed more than 9 forwards and I omitted some really good players off of TW and the AAA MM and mm teams, so he may or may not make the final cut. But Batcha was never a pure goal scorer though IMHO, he's be more of a role player, you need good role players to make good teams, not everyone can be the scorer or playmaker, someone's gotta forecheck and backcheck and do the dirty work. There is a player on TW who's TW stats are nonexistant and who's high school stats would even make you go "What is he doing on TW, how did he make it over this guy or this guy??" etc.... but he is the high energy forechecking bust a gut role player forward and that is why he makes that team consistantly. You make the whole team out of "stars" and in my experience you don't end up having a "team", it's like Brook's says in "Miracle", "I'm not looking for the best players, I'm looking for the right players". :wink:

P.S. I've enjoyed the articulate nonconfrontaitonal discussion on the topic with you. It's fun to speculate on such things.
O-townClown
Posts: 4422
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town

Post by O-townClown »

JSR, I was thinking about the whole role player thing as we guessed on what would happen. If you formed a real team and practiced a bit, the chances for Wisconsin improve. Kind of like how the U.S. has lost to Puerto Rico in basketball.

At the end of the day, it just seems like such a stretch to declare Wisconsin the winner because if everything goes right they'd have enough talent to be as good as the offering from Minnesota. Take Wisconsin (where you live) and Minnesota (where I grew up) out of it and ask, can Saskatchewan or British Columbia beat Ontario?

Finland and Sweden have proven they can hang with Canada on a world stage, so that's probably the biggest case you can make. Still, the next Olympics (if it includes the NHL) will have people expecting Canada over Finland.

Fingers crossed this game happens down the road. Minnesota sent some teams to Massachusetts in the 80s. (And got killed.)
Be kind. Rewind.
JSR
Posts: 1673
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:26 pm

Post by JSR »

O-townClown wrote:JSR, I was thinking about the whole role player thing as we guessed on what would happen. If you formed a real team and practiced a bit, the chances for Wisconsin improve. Kind of like how the U.S. has lost to Puerto Rico in basketball.

At the end of the day, it just seems like such a stretch to declare Wisconsin the winner because if everything goes right they'd have enough talent to be as good as the offering from Minnesota. Take Wisconsin (where you live) and Minnesota (where I grew up) out of it and ask, can Saskatchewan or British Columbia beat Ontario?

Finland and Sweden have proven they can hang with Canada on a world stage, so that's probably the biggest case you can make. Still, the next Olympics (if it includes the NHL) will have people expecting Canada over Finland.

Fingers crossed this game happens down the road. Minnesota sent some teams to Massachusetts in the 80s. (And got killed.)
I never declared WI the winner, in fact I said MN would still probably win a 7 game series. I merely said that WI could field a team that could "hang" on it's own and the series would be competitive with mostly close games but MN would most likely win the series. I was only combating the idea that MN would win by huge margins in and sweep it if it were only the one team. hope that makes sense.
Gopher Blog
Posts: 1548
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
Contact:

Post by Gopher Blog »

What's next? Are we gonna start a debate on what is better between the NCAA and CHL? At least that debate has solid arguments for both. This debate is laughable. :lol:

Can WI field a team that can compete? Sure. Not really a big deal when you consider how a great goaltending performance can keep things competitive. But making a sincere argument that a team of top WI kids are going to be on par with the top MN kids in a typical year? Yeah, right. :roll:

If you look at the original post (and the poll), he asks which is better. There's not a lot of debate there if you have your feet on the ground and your head out of the clouds.
observer
Posts: 2225
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:45 pm

Post by observer »

Whoa, you're wrong, and I'm from Minnesota. The top 15 skaters and a goalie from Wisconsin would compete very well with the top 15 and a goalie from Minnesota. And, as I mentioned in an earlier post, I've found them to be a little tougher and grittier. I'll add that the top players from Michigan and Illinois would compete very well with the Minnesota boys too.

Gopher Blog has his head in a 70s cloud. We used to own these discussions but things have changed.
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: This could be Minnesota's entry

Post by MrBoDangles »

JSR wrote:
O-townClown wrote:I'm impressed that Wisconsin can field a great team. So does Minnesota. I never implied a 15-year-old can't play in the USHL. What you'll see, however, is that when you go looking for a Junior player to put on the team you get a kid with a lot of potential. Minnesota retrieves a HS senior like Ben Marshall (already drafted) or Andy Welinski (likely drafted in a couple months). You find a kid playing in the OHL and Minnesota brings Seth Ambroz, a top contributor in the USHL.

Here is a rough idea of who could play. Of course, I'm leaving out dozens of quality players - a point you readily concede. Adding one at the expense of someone listed below will not weaken the team.

You get the point.


G

Matt McNeely (93) - NTDP
Collin Olson (94) - NTDP
Alex Lyon (Sr) - Lake of the Woods
Adam Wilcox (92) - Green Bay

D

Max Everson (Sr/93) - Edina/NTDP
Brady Skjei (94) - NTDP
Matt Van Voorhis (93) - NTDP
Eddie Wittchow (Sr) - Burnsville
Andy Welinski (93) - Green Bay
Mike Reilly (Sr) - Shattuck-St. Mary's
Ben Marshall (Sr) - Omaha

F

Travis Boyd (93) - NTDP
Dan Carlson (93) - NTDP
Kyle Osterberg (94) - NTDP
Seth Ambroz (93) - Omaha Lancers
Mario Lucia (Jr/93) - Wayzata/NTDP
Tony Camaranesi (Sr) - Wayzata
Steven Fogarty (Sr) - Edina
Joseph LaBate (Sr) - Holy Angels
Kyle Rau (Sr) - Eden Prairie
An impressive list, never said it wouldn't be, and you could probably add twice that to it as I've already admitted.

To some of your other points. Some would argue the OHL is a higher caliber league than the USHL so that may or may not negate your point about that. And some of these WI guys are top contributors in the USHL as well. As for potential, this WI list contains current NHL draft picks, and a couple more in the up coming draft (Navin as one example). As for the "potential" of the other guys, to be playing in the USHL while still in high school you need to be pretty darn good, so lets just leave that at that and not split hairs.

G
- Saxton Soley (Sr) - Eau Claire / TW
- Nick Schreiter (95) - Madison Capitols AAA
- Eric Smith (92/Sr.) - Middleton H.S. / TW

D
- Joe Fiala (93/Sr.) - USNTDP
- Jake McCabe (93/Jr. though accelerated studies to graduate this year) - USNTDP
- Will Butcher (95/Soph) - AAA Capitals / USNTDP
- Jordan Schmaltz (93/Sr) - Fargo USHL
- Aaron Harstad (92/Sr.) - USHL / starts at CC in the fall
- Tim Davison (94/Jr.) - Notre Dame G.B. / TW (turned down USNTDP & USHL offers to return to HS for one more year)
- Ian McCoshen (95/Soph) - Waterloo USHL
- Cliff Watson (Sr) - Appleton H.S. / TW / tOSU recruit

F
- Peter Maric (92/Sr) - Cedar Rapids USHL
- Brad Navin (92/Sr) - Waupaca HS / TW / 3rd in Elite LEague in scoring/ UW recruit likely to go right to UW next season (he is right on par with Labate or Cameranesi)
- Jakob Batcha (93/Sr) - Fargo USHL
- Nick Szopinski (93/Sr) - Beaver Dam HS / TW / WI Wilderness SIJHL
- Trevor Morbeck (93/Sr) - OHL
- Alex Racino (93/Sr) - OHL
- Brett Skibba (93/Sr) - Middleton HS / TW
- Simon Leahy (92/Sr.) - Univ. School Milw / TW (tied with Rau for 8th in pts in Elite League)
- Kyle Lee (93/Sr) - Wausau West H.S. / (formerly Schattuck STM) / TW
- Lane King (93/Sr) - Chicago Mission AAA
- Kyle Schmidt (94/Jr.) - Milwaukee Jr. Admirals AAA

Please, note I only included 4 AAA MM kids as I honestly don't know them as well as I do the high school, junior and USNTDP kids but I am sure there are a few more out there that could likely improve this roster.

Anyway, I see an advantage in goal for MN, other than that, honestly I would actually take the WI defenseman and I think the forwards are pretty darn close, maybe slight edge to MN but only by the slightest of hairs. Like I said before, would not need the other states to "hang" and this team would do just fine in a 7 game series with the team you listed above. Probably come down to goal tending where I admit MN seems ot have the edge on paper but you never know. I could see MN winning a seven game series 4-3 and it going all seven in tight games.

Now just to make sure, I get that if we put together a second team after this, the MN 2nd team would wax the WI 2nd team from here to the moon, sweep them and probably do it without breaking a sweat, but that first team for WI would be very tough.
How about we do some numbers..?
I saw about half of these Wisconsin kids(your list) in the Elite League last Summer.
Wisconsin was a middle of the road team.
Minnesota had five teams.
We'll call it five and a half because of a few talented MN players on SSM.
Add in our many other players in other places and you will see we could match your list many times over. :wink:

Example Two-

Current Minnesota D-1 players- 306
Current Wisconsin D-1 players- 48

D-1 players put out per year- by all routes
Minnesota 70-80 (306 divided by the four years of college)
Wisconsin 10 -15
If Wisconsin's 10-15 are better than a team picked from 70-80........ :?: :idea:

NHL
MN-51
W-9

Hope this helps
JSR
Posts: 1673
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:26 pm

Re: This could be Minnesota's entry

Post by JSR »

MrBoDangles wrote:
JSR wrote:
O-townClown wrote:I'm impressed that Wisconsin can field a great team. So does Minnesota. I never implied a 15-year-old can't play in the USHL. What you'll see, however, is that when you go looking for a Junior player to put on the team you get a kid with a lot of potential. Minnesota retrieves a HS senior like Ben Marshall (already drafted) or Andy Welinski (likely drafted in a couple months). You find a kid playing in the OHL and Minnesota brings Seth Ambroz, a top contributor in the USHL.

Here is a rough idea of who could play. Of course, I'm leaving out dozens of quality players - a point you readily concede. Adding one at the expense of someone listed below will not weaken the team.

You get the point.


G

Matt McNeely (93) - NTDP
Collin Olson (94) - NTDP
Alex Lyon (Sr) - Lake of the Woods
Adam Wilcox (92) - Green Bay

D

Max Everson (Sr/93) - Edina/NTDP
Brady Skjei (94) - NTDP
Matt Van Voorhis (93) - NTDP
Eddie Wittchow (Sr) - Burnsville
Andy Welinski (93) - Green Bay
Mike Reilly (Sr) - Shattuck-St. Mary's
Ben Marshall (Sr) - Omaha

F

Travis Boyd (93) - NTDP
Dan Carlson (93) - NTDP
Kyle Osterberg (94) - NTDP
Seth Ambroz (93) - Omaha Lancers
Mario Lucia (Jr/93) - Wayzata/NTDP
Tony Camaranesi (Sr) - Wayzata
Steven Fogarty (Sr) - Edina
Joseph LaBate (Sr) - Holy Angels
Kyle Rau (Sr) - Eden Prairie
An impressive list, never said it wouldn't be, and you could probably add twice that to it as I've already admitted.

To some of your other points. Some would argue the OHL is a higher caliber league than the USHL so that may or may not negate your point about that. And some of these WI guys are top contributors in the USHL as well. As for potential, this WI list contains current NHL draft picks, and a couple more in the up coming draft (Navin as one example). As for the "potential" of the other guys, to be playing in the USHL while still in high school you need to be pretty darn good, so lets just leave that at that and not split hairs.

G
- Saxton Soley (Sr) - Eau Claire / TW
- Nick Schreiter (95) - Madison Capitols AAA
- Eric Smith (92/Sr.) - Middleton H.S. / TW

D
- Joe Fiala (93/Sr.) - USNTDP
- Jake McCabe (93/Jr. though accelerated studies to graduate this year) - USNTDP
- Will Butcher (95/Soph) - AAA Capitals / USNTDP
- Jordan Schmaltz (93/Sr) - Fargo USHL
- Aaron Harstad (92/Sr.) - USHL / starts at CC in the fall
- Tim Davison (94/Jr.) - Notre Dame G.B. / TW (turned down USNTDP & USHL offers to return to HS for one more year)
- Ian McCoshen (95/Soph) - Waterloo USHL
- Cliff Watson (Sr) - Appleton H.S. / TW / tOSU recruit

F
- Peter Maric (92/Sr) - Cedar Rapids USHL
- Brad Navin (92/Sr) - Waupaca HS / TW / 3rd in Elite LEague in scoring/ UW recruit likely to go right to UW next season (he is right on par with Labate or Cameranesi)
- Jakob Batcha (93/Sr) - Fargo USHL
- Nick Szopinski (93/Sr) - Beaver Dam HS / TW / WI Wilderness SIJHL
- Trevor Morbeck (93/Sr) - OHL
- Alex Racino (93/Sr) - OHL
- Brett Skibba (93/Sr) - Middleton HS / TW
- Simon Leahy (92/Sr.) - Univ. School Milw / TW (tied with Rau for 8th in pts in Elite League)
- Kyle Lee (93/Sr) - Wausau West H.S. / (formerly Schattuck STM) / TW
- Lane King (93/Sr) - Chicago Mission AAA
- Kyle Schmidt (94/Jr.) - Milwaukee Jr. Admirals AAA

Please, note I only included 4 AAA MM kids as I honestly don't know them as well as I do the high school, junior and USNTDP kids but I am sure there are a few more out there that could likely improve this roster.

Anyway, I see an advantage in goal for MN, other than that, honestly I would actually take the WI defenseman and I think the forwards are pretty darn close, maybe slight edge to MN but only by the slightest of hairs. Like I said before, would not need the other states to "hang" and this team would do just fine in a 7 game series with the team you listed above. Probably come down to goal tending where I admit MN seems ot have the edge on paper but you never know. I could see MN winning a seven game series 4-3 and it going all seven in tight games.

Now just to make sure, I get that if we put together a second team after this, the MN 2nd team would wax the WI 2nd team from here to the moon, sweep them and probably do it without breaking a sweat, but that first team for WI would be very tough.
How about we do some numbers..?
I saw about half of these Wisconsin kids(your list) in the Elite League last Summer.
Wisconsin was a middle of the road team.
Minnesota had five teams.
We'll call it five and a half because of a few talented MN players on SSM.
Add in our many other players in other places and you will see we could match your list many times over. :wink:

Example Two-

Current Minnesota D-1 players- 306
Current Wisconsin D-1 players- 48

D-1 players put out per year- by all routes
Minnesota 70-80 (306 divided by the four years of college)
Wisconsin 10 -15
If Wisconsin's 10-15 are better than a team picked from 70-80........ :?: :idea:

NHL
MN-51
W-9

Hope this helps
Not really.

Actually read all of my posts then get back to me.......
darkhorse
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:47 pm

Post by darkhorse »

JSR, most rational people understand the point you were making and for the most part agree with you. For a few, the chest pounding never gets old.
wagon burner
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 12:14 pm

Post by wagon burner »

The fact is that you could compare the "elite" players from any sport and from any state considered to be a major contributor and it would be fairly even. That's why most of them are at the top level, lets say the NHL, NFL or whatever. You can also break it down into a number of categories like birth year, league, when they left high school, drafted players and a list of other factors. The only real question to be asked is who produces the most and better overall talent and in that category, Wisconsin doesnt come close to the Land of 10,000 Lakes.

I am not bashing Wisco hockey because they have come up with some very talented players, but for every 1 player that Wisconsin produces who could make it to the top, Minny has 5 or more to match. Take players such as Kessel, Pavelski, and Stafford as recent examples all hailing from WI. All began their NHL careers around 07. Now take MN representatives: David Backes, Alex Goligoski, Erik Johnson, Paul Martin, Jamie McBain, Peter Mueller, Kyle Okposo, Matt Niskanen, Zach Parise, Ryan Stoa, Mark Stuart, Blake Wheeler. MN still has the advantage when it comes to hockey talent.
Gopher Blog
Posts: 1548
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
Contact:

Post by Gopher Blog »

observer wrote:Whoa, you're wrong, and I'm from Minnesota. The top 15 skaters and a goalie from Wisconsin would compete very well with the top 15 and a goalie from Minnesota. And, as I mentioned in an earlier post, I've found them to be a little tougher and grittier. I'll add that the top players from Michigan and Illinois would compete very well with the Minnesota boys too.
As I said, can they compete? Sure. But that really wasn't the gist of the original post. The original post asked which is "better" at the high end. I don't see much of a debate there.

I am not here to say the MN team would consistently blow out a WI team. But I do think it is clear that MN would defeat the WI team a healthy percentage of the time (80%+). year in and year out, MN produces more high end players and those high end players tend to be better players.
darkhorse
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: Wisconsin vs Minnesota

Post by darkhorse »

wisminhockeyfan88 wrote:We all know that minnesota high school produces more college and pro players. They have a larger number of elite hockey players too. So we know that minnesota has more good hockey players. The question that I want to debate is If you made a team with the top high school players from the whole state of minnesota and did the same with wisconsin, Who would win?
So basically what I am asking is who elite is the best?
Also have links to back up your numbers, if you want to prove your point
THIS is the original post. No one is debating that MN has more top end depth.
HShockeywatcher
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm

Post by HShockeywatcher »

Getting off topic on this forum? No way, that never happens.

As darkhorse just commented on, the question wasn't about mass, it was about the top end. I can (almost) guarantee that if MN and WI to make teams of their #81-100 players, MN would win that game 95 times out of 100, or more, simply because of depth. Same with Texas in basketball, baseball and football, for the same reason.

But the question wasn't about depth. It's really a question for discussion, not numbers, as it can't be answered on a spreadsheet. I'd like to say MN, but I really have no clue about them, probably similar to most other with a lot of MN pride.
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Post by MrBoDangles »

HShockeywatcher wrote:Getting off topic on this forum? No way, that never happens.

As darkhorse just commented on, the question wasn't about mass, it was about the top end. I can (almost) guarantee that if MN and WI to make teams of their #81-100 players, MN would win that game 95 times out of 100, or more, simply because of depth. Same with Texas in basketball, baseball and football, for the same reason.

But the question wasn't about depth. It's really a question for discussion, not numbers, as it can't be answered on a spreadsheet. I'd like to say MN, but I really have no clue about them, probably similar to most other with a lot of MN pride.
You're saying Texas's top 22 High school football players would have a tough challenge against Minnesota's top 22? :roll:

"no clue"
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: This could be Minnesota's entry

Post by MrBoDangles »

JSR wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote:
JSR wrote: An impressive list, never said it wouldn't be, and you could probably add twice that to it as I've already admitted.

To some of your other points. Some would argue the OHL is a higher caliber league than the USHL so that may or may not negate your point about that. And some of these WI guys are top contributors in the USHL as well. As for potential, this WI list contains current NHL draft picks, and a couple more in the up coming draft (Navin as one example). As for the "potential" of the other guys, to be playing in the USHL while still in high school you need to be pretty darn good, so lets just leave that at that and not split hairs.

G
- Saxton Soley (Sr) - Eau Claire / TW
- Nick Schreiter (95) - Madison Capitols AAA
- Eric Smith (92/Sr.) - Middleton H.S. / TW

D
- Joe Fiala (93/Sr.) - USNTDP
- Jake McCabe (93/Jr. though accelerated studies to graduate this year) - USNTDP
- Will Butcher (95/Soph) - AAA Capitals / USNTDP
- Jordan Schmaltz (93/Sr) - Fargo USHL
- Aaron Harstad (92/Sr.) - USHL / starts at CC in the fall
- Tim Davison (94/Jr.) - Notre Dame G.B. / TW (turned down USNTDP & USHL offers to return to HS for one more year)
- Ian McCoshen (95/Soph) - Waterloo USHL
- Cliff Watson (Sr) - Appleton H.S. / TW / tOSU recruit

F
- Peter Maric (92/Sr) - Cedar Rapids USHL
- Brad Navin (92/Sr) - Waupaca HS / TW / 3rd in Elite LEague in scoring/ UW recruit likely to go right to UW next season (he is right on par with Labate or Cameranesi)
- Jakob Batcha (93/Sr) - Fargo USHL
- Nick Szopinski (93/Sr) - Beaver Dam HS / TW / WI Wilderness SIJHL
- Trevor Morbeck (93/Sr) - OHL
- Alex Racino (93/Sr) - OHL
- Brett Skibba (93/Sr) - Middleton HS / TW
- Simon Leahy (92/Sr.) - Univ. School Milw / TW (tied with Rau for 8th in pts in Elite League)
- Kyle Lee (93/Sr) - Wausau West H.S. / (formerly Schattuck STM) / TW
- Lane King (93/Sr) - Chicago Mission AAA
- Kyle Schmidt (94/Jr.) - Milwaukee Jr. Admirals AAA

Please, note I only included 4 AAA MM kids as I honestly don't know them as well as I do the high school, junior and USNTDP kids but I am sure there are a few more out there that could likely improve this roster.

Anyway, I see an advantage in goal for MN, other than that, honestly I would actually take the WI defenseman and I think the forwards are pretty darn close, maybe slight edge to MN but only by the slightest of hairs. Like I said before, would not need the other states to "hang" and this team would do just fine in a 7 game series with the team you listed above. Probably come down to goal tending where I admit MN seems ot have the edge on paper but you never know. I could see MN winning a seven game series 4-3 and it going all seven in tight games.

Now just to make sure, I get that if we put together a second team after this, the MN 2nd team would wax the WI 2nd team from here to the moon, sweep them and probably do it without breaking a sweat, but that first team for WI would be very tough.
How about we do some numbers..?
I saw about half of these Wisconsin kids(your list) in the Elite League last Summer.
Wisconsin was a middle of the road team.
Minnesota had five teams.
We'll call it five and a half because of a few talented MN players on SSM.
Add in our many other players in other places and you will see we could match your list many times over. :wink:

Example Two-

Current Minnesota D-1 players- 306
Current Wisconsin D-1 players- 48

D-1 players put out per year- by all routes
Minnesota 70-80 (306 divided by the four years of college)
Wisconsin 10 -15
If Wisconsin's 10-15 are better than a team picked from 70-80........ :?: :idea:

NHL
MN-51
W-9

Hope this helps
Not really.

Actually read all of my posts then get back to me.......
Explain what is so special about this small Wisconsin group...... Minnesota could roster six teams with the same credentials and pull a combined all star team from them. :D :idea:
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: Wisconsin vs Minnesota

Post by MrBoDangles »

darkhorse wrote:
wisminhockeyfan88 wrote:We all know that minnesota high school produces more college and pro players. They have a larger number of elite hockey players too. So we know that minnesota has more good hockey players. The question that I want to debate is If you made a team with the top high school players from the whole state of minnesota and did the same with wisconsin, Who would win?
So basically what I am asking is who elite is the best?
Also have links to back up your numbers, if you want to prove your point
THIS is the original post. No one is debating that MN has more top end depth.
Doesn't the number of "pro players" or 6 to 1 D-1 players, show that Minnesota's top of the top, tippy top, top players would average out better than Wisconsin's top 16? Is this group different than other Wisconsin groups? :shock: Will all those kids even make it to D-1? The averages say NO! :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea:
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Post by MrBoDangles »

darkhorse wrote:JSR, most rational people understand the point you were making and for the most part agree with you. For a few, the chest pounding never gets old.
I'm pounding my chest while doing the moonwalk. :lol:
darkhorse
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: Wisconsin vs Minnesota

Post by darkhorse »

MrBoDangles wrote:Doesn't the number of "pro players" or 6 to 1 D-1 players, show that Minnesota's top of the top, tippy top, top players would average out better than Wisconsin's top 16? Is this group different than other Wisconsin groups?
No on the first question and yes on the second. Ignorance is bliss.
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: Wisconsin vs Minnesota

Post by MrBoDangles »

darkhorse wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote:Doesn't the number of "pro players" or 6 to 1 D-1 players, show that Minnesota's top of the top, tippy top, top players would average out better than Wisconsin's top 16? Is this group different than other Wisconsin groups?
No on the first question and yes on the second. Ignorance is bliss.
And you can't fix stupid. :idea:
HShockeywatcher
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm

Post by HShockeywatcher »

MrBoDangles wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote:Getting off topic on this forum? No way, that never happens.

As darkhorse just commented on, the question wasn't about mass, it was about the top end. I can (almost) guarantee that if MN and WI to make teams of their #81-100 players, MN would win that game 95 times out of 100, or more, simply because of depth. Same with Texas in basketball, baseball and football, for the same reason.

But the question wasn't about depth. It's really a question for discussion, not numbers, as it can't be answered on a spreadsheet. I'd like to say MN, but I really have no clue about them, probably similar to most other with a lot of MN pride.
You're saying Texas's top 22 High school football players would have a tough challenge against Minnesota's top 22? :roll:

"no clue"
Not sure you can find that in anything I said #-o =D>
As always, if you need help understanding the words that are written in plain English, please ask.

Way to use up 4 posts that could've been one. ](*,)
MrBoDangles wrote:
darkhorse wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote:Doesn't the number of "pro players" or 6 to 1 D-1 players, show that Minnesota's top of the top, tippy top, top players would average out better than Wisconsin's top 16? Is this group different than other Wisconsin groups?
No on the first question and yes on the second. Ignorance is bliss.
And you can't fix stupid. :idea:
We've been trying to help you with that for a while, but to now avail ](*,)

Saying that after 4 years SIX players DEVELOPED to be really good is great, but it has little to do with how good they were 4 years earlier. And even if they were that great 4 years earlier (which they weren't since they didn't go straight to the NHL) they still need teammates.

No one is saying MN wouldn't probably win, because they probably would. But hockey isn't an individual sport, it's a TEAM sport, and better coaching can win games. Say MN had players ranked 30-45 and WI had 46-61. Saying that MN would be a lock to win that is silly. We see this in MN hockey all the time and know better.
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Post by MrBoDangles »

HShockeywatcher wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote:Getting off topic on this forum? No way, that never happens.

As darkhorse just commented on, the question wasn't about mass, it was about the top end. I can (almost) guarantee that if MN and WI to make teams of their #81-100 players, MN would win that game 95 times out of 100, or more, simply because of depth. Same with Texas in basketball, baseball and football, for the same reason.

But the question wasn't about depth. It's really a question for discussion, not numbers, as it can't be answered on a spreadsheet. I'd like to say MN, but I really have no clue about them, probably similar to most other with a lot of MN pride.
You're saying Texas's top 22 High school football players would have a tough challenge against Minnesota's top 22? :roll:

"no clue"
Not sure you can find that in anything I said #-o =D>
As always, if you need help understanding the words that are written in plain English, please ask.

Way to use up 4 posts that could've been one. ](*,)
MrBoDangles wrote:
darkhorse wrote: No on the first question and yes on the second. Ignorance is bliss.
And you can't fix stupid. :idea:
We've been trying to help you with that for a while, but to now avail ](*,)

Saying that after 4 years SIX players DEVELOPED to be really good is great, but it has little to do with how good they were 4 years earlier. And even if they were that great 4 years earlier (which they weren't since they didn't go straight to the NHL) they still need teammates.

No one is saying MN wouldn't probably win, because they probably would. But hockey isn't an individual sport, it's a TEAM sport, and better coaching can win games. Say MN had players ranked 30-45 and WI had 46-61. Saying that MN would be a lock to win that is silly. We see this in MN hockey all the time and know better.
I set it up as a kinder kare comprehension class to see the obvious facts. I guess some are just unable to follow... :roll:

Good to hear you say now that "no one is saying MN wouldn't probably win." Do you ever know what you're saying? What was the poll for?

](*,) :idea:

And this is coming from the sandbag backer. :roll:
Gopher Blog
Posts: 1548
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
Contact:

Re: Wisconsin vs Minnesota

Post by Gopher Blog »

MrBoDangles wrote:
darkhorse wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote:Doesn't the number of "pro players" or 6 to 1 D-1 players, show that Minnesota's top of the top, tippy top, top players would average out better than Wisconsin's top 16? Is this group different than other Wisconsin groups?
No on the first question and yes on the second. Ignorance is bliss.
And you can't fix stupid. :idea:
:lol:
warriors41
Posts: 666
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:40 pm

Post by warriors41 »

wagon burner wrote:The fact is that you could compare the "elite" players from any sport and from any state considered to be a major contributor and it would be fairly even. That's why most of them are at the top level, lets say the NHL, NFL or whatever. You can also break it down into a number of categories like birth year, league, when they left high school, drafted players and a list of other factors. The only real question to be asked is who produces the most and better overall talent and in that category, Wisconsin doesnt come close to the Land of 10,000 Lakes.

I am not bashing Wisco hockey because they have come up with some very talented players, but for every 1 player that Wisconsin produces who could make it to the top, Minny has 5 or more to match. Take players such as Kessel, Pavelski, and Stafford as recent examples all hailing from WI. All began their NHL careers around 07. Now take MN representatives: David Backes, Alex Goligoski, Erik Johnson, Paul Martin, Jamie McBain, Peter Mueller, Kyle Okposo, Matt Niskanen, Zach Parise, Ryan Stoa, Mark Stuart, Blake Wheeler. MN still has the advantage when it comes to hockey talent.
Minnesota does a better job of producing NHL players compared to Wisconsin. Numbers alone prove that. However, and you can call me crazy, I did a little draft in my head and while the best player you listed is probably Parise, the next two I would pick are Kessel and Pavelski. And even with some of the players you forgot to list I don't think that would change. I could be forgetting someone though. Just watch how they play in the playoffs. They are all around players that never take off a shift. And when they score goals, they are important goals (game tying goals, gwg goal, OT goals, etc.).

The point I'm trying to make is that depth is no question an advantage for Minnesota, but top end (top two or three players from each state), it's too close to call. Again, I know I'm crazy and I'm probably going to hell for saying that.
Slap Shot
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:44 pm

Post by Slap Shot »

Someone else made a pretty good point - would the a MN elite FB team be able to compete regulary with a TX elite team? No chest-thumping required, but imho on average the elite MN class would beat the elite WI class more often than not.
HShockeywatcher
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm

Post by HShockeywatcher »

Slap Shot wrote:Someone else made a pretty good point - would the a MN elite FB team be able to compete regulary with a TX elite team? No chest-thumping required, but imho on average the elite MN class would beat the elite WI class more often than not.
Not sure how that's a good point; comparing MN and TX in football is close to comparing them in hockey.

Comparing MN and WI, MI or MA in hockey is like comparing TX to FL, CA or OH in football. Would MN probably win those games 8 times out of 10? Would TX probably win those games 8 times out of 10? Yes and yes.

Can we know either for sure? How many hockey games have you seen played on paper recently?

Instead of listing how much depth MN has, try listing how the top 20 or so from each state rank nationally. While not played on paper, this would be a better indication of who would win than the depth that continues to be posted about.
The Other Bash Brother
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:08 pm

Post by The Other Bash Brother »

HShockeywatcher wrote:
Slap Shot wrote:Someone else made a pretty good point - would the a MN elite FB team be able to compete regulary with a TX elite team? No chest-thumping required, but imho on average the elite MN class would beat the elite WI class more often than not.
Not sure how that's a good point; comparing MN and TX in football is close to comparing them in hockey.

Comparing MN and WI, MI or MA in hockey is like comparing TX to FL, CA or OH in football. Would MN probably win those games 8 times out of 10? Would TX probably win those games 8 times out of 10? Yes and yes.

Can we know either for sure? How many hockey games have you seen

played on paper recently?


Instead of listing how much depth MN has, try listing how the top 20 or so from each state rank nationally. While not played on paper, this would be a better indication of who would win than the depth that continues to be posted about.
That depth means that MN makes an all star team from 50 guys and WI makes their team from 22. The top guys out of MN's 50 will be better than Wi's top 22.

If you deny that you probably went to St. Thomas or some other weak minded private school.
Post Reply