PeeWee A District Playoff Scores

gorilla1 · Post by **gorilla1** » Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:57 pm

D6 playoffs

Chaska/Chan 5
Waconia 4

Edina and Tonka just getting done

Rank12 · Post by **Rank12** » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:41 pm

Updated District Playoff Scores for all distrists:

http://minnesotahockeyreport.com/2012/0 ... summaries/

Irish · Post by **Irish** » Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:09 pm

gorilla1 wrote:D6 playoffs

Chaska/Chan 5
Waconia 4

Edina and Tonka just getting done

Mr. Ape,
Minnetonka beat Edina 4-1.

Frosty4 · Post by **Frosty4** » Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:57 pm

Irish wrote:
gorilla1 wrote:D6 playoffs

Chaska/Chan 5
Waconia 4

Edina and Tonka just getting done
Mr. Ape,
Minnetonka beat Edina 4-1.[/quote

Prior Lake - 10
Chaska/Chan - 2

BadgerBob82 · Post by **BadgerBob82** » Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:57 pm

Hey Fred: Nice writeup on the D9 play-offs! You are still mad that your Albert Lea team once again was knocked out of the play-in game by a B1 team? If you wanted to play Rochester Red, you could have scheduled a game or two during the District scheduling meeting. I'm sure you would have gotten way better! All of the D9 associations agree Rochester should not be in D9. Use your influence and get Rochester kicked out of D9 and back into D8 where they belong!

Until that time, D9 is not the place for Rochester's Red team. To force 15 games on teams that can't put 5 shots on goal in a game does nobody any good. That's why only Mankato wants to play the Red teams. Northfield did too but found not getting even one single shot on goal the entire game wasn't much of a learning experience.

Get your facts straight! You come off as a disgruntled Albert Lea rube!

helightsthelamp · Post by **helightsthelamp** » Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:12 pm

Elk River 6
Irondale 1

One really CRAZY Irondale parent and coach/kids wearing Alexandria 2012 hats....Really

Rank12 · Post by **Rank12** » Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:02 pm

District Playoff Updated:
http://minnesotahockeyreport.com/2012/0 ... summaries/

Minnetonka Vs. Eden Prairie Game:
http://minnesotahockeyreport.com/2012/0 ... -playoffs/

HOCKEYlover1919 · Post by **HOCKEYlover1919** » Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:04 pm

Hastings-3
Woodbury-2

LVS-12
AV-1

Hastings plays LVS on saturday for a regions spot

Rank12 · Post by **Rank12** » Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:16 am

Prior Lake 10
Minnetonka 1

Game Recap:
http://minnesotahockeyreport.com/2012/0 ... -playoffs/

Crow River 5
Wayzata Blue 4

Game Recap:
http://minnesotahockeyreport.com/2012/0 ... in-in-pwa/

Oberver4 · Post by **Oberver4** » Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:21 pm

Anyone know the EP vs TONKA score?

Bison49 · Post by **Bison49** » Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:38 pm

Minnetonka 4
EP 3

farmington14 · Post by **farmington14** » Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:47 pm

Farmington 4
Eastview 1

HOCKEYlover1919 · Post by **HOCKEYlover1919** » Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:19 pm

LVS 5 Hastings 4 OT
LVS was down by 2 with 2 mites left
LVN 3 Farmington 2
LVN was losing until 13 seconds left in the 3rd

Both lakeville teams play for the D8 championship

Monsterbuck1 · Post by **Monsterbuck1** » Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:31 pm

D2 Championship
Stillwater - 6
Highland -3

Highland Plays WBL for D2 2nd seed to East Regions on Sunday

Rusty Blades · Post by **Rusty Blades** » Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:34 pm

Eastview 1
Hastings 0

Woodbury 6
Farmington 0

Woodbury vs Eastview for the last D8 ticket to Regionals

ERPWA Hockey · Post by **ERPWA Hockey** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:16 pm

D10 Championship - Cougars 4 (EN) vs Elks 2

Congrats to Centennial

Elks vs Knights at 5:30 loser goes home, winner gets #2 seed

Gotothenetman · Post by **Gotothenetman** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:53 pm

Rusty Blades wrote:Eastview 1
Hastings 0

Woodbury 6
Farmington 0

Woodbury vs Eastview for the last D8 ticket to Regionals

All I can say was this was a joke and S. St. Paul Association should be embarassed on how this was run, and D8 should have been more aware of what was going on.

To have both Hastings and Farmington come back after huge semi-final games in less than 3 hours while the team they now had to play had almost 8 hours between games in wrong.

In the only tournament that mean anything to have such un-equity is terrible. To end kids season's without gving them a fair chance is brutal.

I am not saying that Eastview or Woodbury were not capable of winning their games. To me the difference between games of 8 hours to 3 is unfair and wrong.

I would think that Eastview and Woodbury would want to beat those teams on a even playing field or at least close.

I looked at all the other D8 brackets for other levels and there was no other bracket that had this large of a difference between the teams playing in those same games.

I have no issue if you want the gap to be 3 hours between games then make it 3 hours or close for both teams not just one.

Hard to see kids crying knowing they are done when you know that the playing field was not even.

crazyhorse · Post by **crazyhorse** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:14 pm

Gotothenetman wrote:
Rusty Blades wrote:Eastview 1
Hastings 0

Woodbury 6
Farmington 0

Woodbury vs Eastview for the last D8 ticket to Regionals
All I can say was this was a joke and S. St. Paul Association should be embarassed on how this was run, and D8 should have been more aware of what was going on.

To have both Hastings and Farmington come back after huge semi-final games in less than 3 hours while the team they now had to play had almost 8 hours between games in wrong.

In the only tournament that mean anything to have such un-equity is terrible. To end kids season's without gving them a fair chance is brutal.

I am not saying that Eastview or Woodbury were not capable of winning the games. To me that difference between games of 8 hours to 3 is wrong.

I would think that Eastview and Woodbury would want to beat those teams on a even playing field or at least close.

I looked at all the other D8 brackets for other levels and there was no other bracket that had this large of a difference between the teams playing in those same games.

I have no issue if you want the gap to be 3 hours between games then make it 3 hours or close for both teams not.

Hard to see kids cring knowing they are done when you know that the playing field was not even.

I agree, however, the biggest joke was the D6 playoff bracket and how three teams qualify for regions on one win. They definitely made it difficult, if not impossible for any team seeded 5th or below to make it. Chaska/Chan went 4-2 and did not make it after losing its sixth game to Edina (which went 1-1).

spin-o-rama · Post by **spin-o-rama** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:39 pm

crazyhorse wrote: I agree, however, the biggest joke was the D6 playoff bracket and how three teams qualify for regions on one win. They definitely made it difficult, if not impossible for any team seeded 5th or below to make it. Chaska/Chan went 4-2 and did not make it after losing its sixth game to Edina (which went 1-1).

Let's see:
11 team league
Edina 12-4, 3rd place, 3 seed
Chaska 4-11-1, 9th place, 9 seed

Please explain why the seeding should have been different or why the brackets should be set to provide such different records with identical paths to regions.

It appears Edina earned the right to advance with 1 win and Chaska still needed to prove themselves. They had a nice playoff run. Congrats to them.

GTTN · Post by **GTTN** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:03 pm

spin-o-rama wrote:
crazyhorse wrote: I agree, however, the biggest joke was the D6 playoff bracket and how three teams qualify for regions on one win. They definitely made it difficult, if not impossible for any team seeded 5th or below to make it. Chaska/Chan went 4-2 and did not make it after losing its sixth game to Edina (which went 1-1).
Let's see:
11 team league
Edina 12-4, 3rd place, 3 seed
Chaska 4-11-1, 9th place, 9 seed

Please explain why the seeding should have been different or why the brackets should be set to provide such different records with identical paths to regions.

It appears Edina earned the right to advance with 1 win and Chaska still needed to prove themselves. They had a nice playoff run. Congrats to them.

Well said Spin. You earn your region birth with a nice regular season and a nice win or two in the district playoffs.

Monsterbuck1 · Post by **Monsterbuck1** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:35 pm

Many of the Districts are brutal with updating scores. D3 and D8 are two days behind. It shouldn't be that tough. D2 has it's problems but at least they are on top of the results.

helightsthelamp · Post by **helightsthelamp** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:49 pm

ERPWA Hockey wrote:D10 Championship - Cougars 4 (EN) vs Elks 2

Congrats to Centennial

Elks vs Knights at 5:30 loser goes home, winner gets #2 seed

Elks get the #2 seed 6-0 over Irondale

Cdale · Post by **Cdale** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:52 pm

I'll try & find a box of Kleenex.

Rusty Blades · Post by **Rusty Blades** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:00 pm

I do believe that D8 finished this way:

#1 Lakeville South
#2 Lakeville North
#3 Woodbury

I wouldn't call it official until District 8 confirms it but I'm 99.99 % sure that's who you will see at the East Regional.

USAhorrorstory · Post by **USAhorrorstory** » Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:45 pm

Rusty Blades wrote:I do believe that D8 finished this way:

#1 Lakeville South
#2 Lakeville North
#3 Woodbury

I wouldn't call it official until District 8 confirms it but I'm 99.99 % sure that's who you will see at the East Regional.

Lakeville South beat Lakeville North 7-3
Woodbury beat Eastview 3-2 in 3OT

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

PeeWee A District Playoff Scores

D6

D10 Score