2) White Bear Lake
3) Stillwater
4) Roseville
5) Tartan
6) North St Paul
7) Mounds View

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Seems about right. Mounds View could make a case for 6th if they beat Stillwater, but their loss to North St. Paul pretty much sealed the top-6 seeds. And Irondale won't be given anything above an 8th seed.chester1991 wrote:1) Hill Murray
2) White Bear Lake
3) Stillwater
4) Roseville
5) Tartan
6) North St Paul
7) Mounds View
Irondale
chester1991 wrote:1) Hill Murray
2) White Bear Lake
3) Stillwater
4) Roseville
5) Tartan
6) North St Paul
7) Mounds View
Irondale
inthetwine wrote:chester1991 wrote:1) Hill Murray
2) White Bear Lake
3) Stillwater
4) Roseville
5) Tartan
6) North St Paul
7) Mounds View
Irondale
Ok, except
5. MV
6. Tartan
7. NSP
MV has wins over Stillwater, WBL, and Tartan.
GreekChurch wrote:Speaking of NSP, Jerry Diebel is retiring. Is there a good coach in waiting out there? I think NSP has had some talented players over the past several years and others from the Association that went elsewhere. This is a large enough program that should be more competetive at the high school level. The frustration of the Oliver twins was quite evident on the ice Saturday vs. HM. The have gone backwards since they met HM in December.inthetwine wrote: NSP plays Tartan tomorrow, if they win ....
Mounds View is sure a mystery. They beat WBL, East Ridge & Tartan and tie CDH, yet get blown out by NSP and Hastings.
Yup, this is the way I see it.hockeysocks wrote:No way mounds view drops to 7. They have wins over wbl, stillwater and tartan. They'll end up with the 5 seed.
inthetwine wrote:Yup, this is the way I see it.hockeysocks wrote:No way mounds view drops to 7. They have wins over wbl, stillwater and tartan. They'll end up with the 5 seed.
1. East Metro All Stars
2. WBL
3. Stillwater
4. Roseville
5. MV
6. Tartan
7. NSP
8. Irondale[/q
Looks good, except swap Moundsview, and Tartan. Thats the way I see it right now.
GreekChurch wrote:I guess you could flip/flop Tartan and MV based on win/loss record. But Tartan has no quality wins, and MV does, Plus MV won the head to head matchup.inthetwine wrote:Yup, this is the way I see it.hockeysocks wrote:No way mounds view drops to 7. They have wins over wbl, stillwater and tartan. They'll end up with the 5 seed.
1. East Metro All Stars
2. WBL
3. Stillwater
4. Roseville
5. MV
6. Tartan
7. NSP
8. Irondale[/q
Looks good, except swap Moundsview, and Tartan. Thats the way I see it right now.
So how do they determine seeds?GreekChurch wrote:There is an argument for both, but Moundsview has been so inconsistent. Its tough for me to reward them for 2 quality wins out of their 8, and a tie with Cretin, when the could possibly have a 15 loss season. Idk, they beat Tartan 3 -2. If thats enough...
keepthestreak wrote:So how do they determine seeds?GreekChurch wrote:There is an argument for both, but Moundsview has been so inconsistent. Its tough for me to reward them for 2 quality wins out of their 8, and a tie with Cretin, when the could possibly have a 15 loss season. Idk, they beat Tartan 3 -2. If thats enough...
You say its tough for you to reward MV for their two quality wins (also a tie to Stillwater and a tie to CDH possible #1 in 3AA) so why would you reward Tartan for no quality wins and a head to head loss to MV? Even though Tartan has a better record their strength of schedule is much lower than MV. According to this site MV is at 34 and Tartan is at 61 for strength of schedule.GreekChurch wrote:keepthestreak wrote:So how do they determine seeds?GreekChurch wrote:There is an argument for both, but Moundsview has been so inconsistent. Its tough for me to reward them for 2 quality wins out of their 8, and a tie with Cretin, when the could possibly have a 15 loss season. Idk, they beat Tartan 3 -2. If thats enough...
Well, the section coaches will go in on the 17th, and hash it out, plead their case or whatever, and come up with the seedings. Four Suburban East coaches, three Classic Suburban coaches, and Irondale.
keepthestreak wrote:You say its tough for you to reward MV for their two quality wins (also a tie to Stillwater and a tie to CDH possible #1 in 3AA) so why would you reward Tartan for no quality wins and a head to head loss to MV? Even though Tartan has a better record their strength of schedule is much lower than MV. According to this site MV is at 34 and Tartan is at 61 for strength of schedule.GreekChurch wrote:keepthestreak wrote: So how do they determine seeds?
Well, the section coaches will go in on the 17th, and hash it out, plead their case or whatever, and come up with the seedings. Four Suburban East coaches, three Classic Suburban coaches, and Irondale.
Remember last season Stillwater got the 4 and they only had 9 wins. There must be a formula they use to figure it all out[/quote
I personally don't care how they are seeded, as you have to win to advance, but strenghth of schedule doesn't mean rip if you don't win games. You're right MV has had a tougher schedule, but I'm pretty sure Tartan could have played that same schedule, and mustered 8 wins out it.
In the past, they have always met on Sunday, I think the meeting is on the 16th.GreekChurch wrote:keepthestreak wrote:So how do they determine seeds?GreekChurch wrote:There is an argument for both, but Moundsview has been so inconsistent. Its tough for me to reward them for 2 quality wins out of their 8, and a tie with Cretin, when the could possibly have a 15 loss season. Idk, they beat Tartan 3 -2. If thats enough...
Well, the section coaches will go in on the 17th, and hash it out, plead their case or whatever, and come up with the seedings. Four Suburban East coaches, three Classic Suburban coaches, and Irondale.
inthetwine wrote:In the past, they have always met on Sunday, I think the meeting is on the 16th.GreekChurch wrote:keepthestreak wrote: So how do they determine seeds?
Well, the section coaches will go in on the 17th, and hash it out, plead their case or whatever, and come up with the seedings. Four Suburban East coaches, three Classic Suburban coaches, and Irondale.