No I believe it was 1-0 Lakeville. Shots were pretty even in the third. ended up 4-1elliott70 wrote:6 to 1B-Ville Hockey Guy wrote:What was the score after two periods?Sats81 wrote: I am not just referring to SOG. If you were there you would have known that Burnsville never showed anything. They were completely outplayed and if the score would have been 8-1 or 10-1 (which it could have easily been), I think a lot of people who weren't there would have then assumed they were dominated based off of the score and SOG.
AA Rankings for 12/14/14
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:12 pm
-
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm
Sorry, Sats, my reply was intended more as a general observation, not this game specifically.Sats81 wrote:I am not just referring to SOG. If you were there you would have known that Burnsville never showed anything. They were completely outplayed and if the score would have been 8-1 or 10-1 (which it could have easily been), I think a lot of people who weren't there would have then assumed they were dominated based off of the score and SOG.
No worries, we are still pals!MNHockeyFan wrote:Sorry, Sats, my reply was intended more as a general observation, not this game specifically.Sats81 wrote:I am not just referring to SOG. If you were there you would have known that Burnsville never showed anything. They were completely outplayed and if the score would have been 8-1 or 10-1 (which it could have easily been), I think a lot of people who weren't there would have then assumed they were dominated based off of the score and SOG.