Goalie tryouts

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
Around the boards
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 8:41 pm

Goalie tryouts

Post by Around the boards »

interested in hearing how different hockey associations evaluate their goalies during tryouts. Do they grade the goalies on skills or just how they play in scrimmages or some sort of combination of the two

Who does the grading...head coaches, tryout committee members, outside evaluators?
newsguy35
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Eagan

Post by newsguy35 »

I know that in certain schools they evaluate based on size and how they will be prepared at the next level. What level is the kid? Bantams is a little bit more on how the kid is built as in size (height and weight) and peewees is a bit less. Certain HS coaches base it on both as opposed who stops the puck best. Certain areas and schools are different but either way the kid better know how to stop the puck...
Cornermukker
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:20 am

Goalie Evaluation

Post by Cornermukker »

This brings me to an interesting debate I am sure we are going to have here in our association.

At the bantam level we will have 4 goalies, all will be first year, and we will have an A team and a B team. 1 of the 4 will have some success at the A level, the others are not at all ready for bantam A hockey. Do put 2 on each team? I am sure that is the way it will turn out, but is it better for the second goalie on the A team? I would like to hear your thoughts on it...
32HockeyFan
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:59 am

Re: Goalie Evaluation

Post by 32HockeyFan »

Cornermukker wrote:This brings me to an interesting debate I am sure we are going to have here in our association.

At the bantam level we will have 4 goalies, all will be first year, and we will have an A team and a B team. 1 of the 4 will have some success at the A level, the others are not at all ready for bantam A hockey. Do put 2 on each team? I am sure that is the way it will turn out, but is it better for the second goalie on the A team? I would like to hear your thoughts on it...

Put two goalies at Bantam A. With all first years, you'll need it. Injuries, illness, etc will play a part. Our association allows for a 70-30 split on goalie playing time at Bantam A. If your's does, then the weaker goalie could play against the weaker teams in your district, and tournaments to build his confidence. He will also improve by facing the A level skaters in practice during the year.
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Re: Goalie Evaluation

Post by Can't Never Tried »

32HockeyFan wrote:
Cornermukker wrote:This brings me to an interesting debate I am sure we are going to have here in our association.

At the bantam level we will have 4 goalies, all will be first year, and we will have an A team and a B team. 1 of the 4 will have some success at the A level, the others are not at all ready for bantam A hockey. Do put 2 on each team? I am sure that is the way it will turn out, but is it better for the second goalie on the A team? I would like to hear your thoughts on it...

Put two goalies at Bantam A. With all first years, you'll need it. Injuries, illness, etc will play a part. Our association allows for a 70-30 split on goalie playing time at Bantam A. If your's does, then the weaker goalie could play against the weaker teams in your district, and tournaments to build his confidence. He will also improve by facing the A level skaters in practice during the year.
I agree with 32HF.... also it's never good to let #1 think he can take a game off because there's no replacement.
O-townClown
Posts: 4422
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town

Golden Rule

Post by O-townClown »

If it is close between two kids for a spot, go with the one that has the hottest mom.
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Re: Golden Rule

Post by Can't Never Tried »

O-townClown wrote:If it is close between two kids for a spot, go with the one that has the hottest mom.
That is a secret rule.... and we used to say is only to be used at squirts and below for obvious reasons....it's also.... in extreme cases, a good reason for a move up.. :lol:

Although these days those PW and Bantam moms are looking better :shock:
tomASS
Posts: 2512
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:18 pm
Location: Chaska

Re: Golden Rule

Post by tomASS »

Can't Never Tried wrote:
O-townClown wrote:If it is close between two kids for a spot, go with the one that has the hottest mom.
That is a secret rule.... and we used to say is only to be used at squirts and below for obvious reasons....it's also.... in extreme cases, a good reason for a move up.. :lol:

Although these days those PW and Bantam moms are looking better :shock:
Always wondered why there is not more non-parent mite and squirt commissioners. It might have to be a job for me in retirement years
fighting all who rob or plunder
O-townClown
Posts: 4422
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town

glad you're all seeing the tongue-in-cheek nature of my post

Post by O-townClown »

When we were Midgets we had a vote for who had the hottest mom on the team and then we told the kid who 'won'. Talk about uncomfortable! I guess it is a compliment, but it is also a little creepy for the 15- or 16-year-old who finds out his buddies think his mom's a piece.
Around the boards
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 8:41 pm

Post by Around the boards »

I agree you should have two goalies on a bantam a team..but maybe not equal playing time...
Post Reply