Warroad HS Boys vs. US Womens National Team

RLStars
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Warroad HS Boys vs. US Womens National Team

Post by RLStars »

Accordining to the cover article in "Let's PLay Hockey" magazine, the Warroad boys HS varsity squad will play the US Womens National team on Jan. 4th 2006. Apparantly the MSHSL has said that the game will be played using Boys HS rules, so body contact will be allowed (no jokes here people).<br><br>Who do you think will win this game, last years MN State Class A Champions or USA's top female hockey players. There is a poll in the "Minnesota HS Hockey Polls" page on this site. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... RLStars</A> at: 10/19/05 12:24 pm<br></i>
MNHockey89
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:06 pm

?

Post by MNHockey89 »

I am suprised that MSHSL would allow this to happen but if it did, it would depend on the warroads team willingness to hit the girls. contact is a huge part in the way guys play hockey and i know if i was playing a girls team i would hesitate hitting them so im not sure how the outcome would be. Is warroad even suppose to be good this year? <p></p><i></i>
elliott70
Posts: 15431
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Re: ?

Post by elliott70 »

Warroad will have a good team.<br><br>But these girls are fast and crafty.<br><br>Marvin and a couple of other Warriors may keep up, but player for player the girls will probably be faster. The boys will have to hit, IMHO. <p></p><i></i>
elliott70
Posts: 15431
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Re: ?

Post by elliott70 »

I'll take the girls. <p></p><i></i>
hawkfan70
Posts: 1316
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:59 am
Location: City of Hockey in Minnesota

girls

Post by hawkfan70 »

Are the women on this team mostly college girls? <br>specifically D1 players <p></p><i></i>
goldy313
Posts: 3949
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 11:56 am

Re: girls

Post by goldy313 »

I have to be careful here but here goes.<br><br>3 years ago I had the experiance of working both the WCHA womens tournament and the womens world junior championships. In both cases a good PeeWee A team would have won both those tournaments. Warroads goalie will see better shots and puck movement in Marriucci conference games than they'll see in this game. Not to mention playing this game with checking gives Warroad a hefty advantage. I don't quite get who this game will benefit. Warroad loses and they're a laughing stock in the high school hockey world, they win and the US women lose whatever prestige they've gathered to date in their history. <p></p><i></i>
crosscheck
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 8:37 pm

I believe....?

Post by crosscheck »

I believe they are playing boys high school rules with the exception no checking.<br><br>Still, what on earth is a boys team stooping to play a girls team. Or why is the USA team stooping to play a boys team? <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
puckhead89
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:37 pm

Re: Warroad HS Boys vs. US Womens National Team

Post by puckhead89 »

It would have been interesting to be in on the discussions that took place sanctioning this game. If anybody has knowledge as to the reasons this is going forward, please enlighten us all. <p></p><i></i>
RLStars
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Re: I believe....?

Post by RLStars »

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>“I’m still a little confused about what the rules will be. I assumed at first that we would play no-check, but I’ve heard since then that the High School League requires that we play by our rules. If we do that, I would imagine we would make some sort of agreement about how physical teams should play.”<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>From Dennis Fermoyle, Warroad head boys hockey coach. <p></p><i></i>
lear
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:42 am

wrd vs women

Post by lear »

this is a bad idea for both teams...........makes no sense.....with goldy313 on this one........??who benefits?? <p></p><i></i>
RLStars
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Re: wrd vs women

Post by RLStars »

The arena where it will be held. Should be standing room only. <p></p><i></i>
wild77
Posts: 375
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 8:54 am

Re: wrd vs women

Post by wild77 »

Actually, I heard that both teams had made a "gentleman's" agreement (sorry but that) that there would be no checking. <p></p><i></i>
rbk4me227
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 2:14 pm

Re: wrd vs women

Post by rbk4me227 »

where is it gonna be played? <p></p><i></i>
fastice16
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:01 pm

warroad vs women

Post by fastice16 »

I'm going to have to make it to this game. I'm really interested to see how I comes out. I think I'll take the girls just cause it would be great to see them beat the boys. <p>The Iceman</p><i></i>
elliott70
Posts: 15431
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Re: warroad vs women

Post by elliott70 »

If I heard correctly,<br><br>the game is at Warroad. <p></p><i></i>
puckhead89
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:37 pm

Re: warroad vs women-just don't get it

Post by puckhead89 »

I still don't get it.....RL Stars you are right...the only one who benefits from this is the host to the game...perhaps that explains why Warroad is willing? I'll believe the game will happen when the puck is dropped....until then, there is plenty of time to back out by either team. NOW, if we learn this is a form of a fundraiser for some good cause, that is a different story. <p></p><i></i>
WBLBEARS06
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 2:05 pm

Re: warroad vs women-just don't get it

Post by WBLBEARS06 »

this would be very fun to watch, where is it going to be played? <p>The curse lives on.....</p><i></i>
crosscheck
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 8:37 pm

Re: warroad vs women-just don't get it

Post by crosscheck »

Warroad needs to generate $$$$$$ to run their arena. This will bring in revenue, but it is still costly to bring in any USA team being they need to generate revenue also. I'm hoping the boys whallop the girls on the score board. <br><br>Does this count as a regular scheduled game for the Warriors or is it just a "scrimmage"? <p></p><i></i>
WarroadWarrior
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 12:14 am

Re: girls hockeys

Post by WarroadWarrior »

I don't imagine they are doing it because the arena "needs" the money. But i don't doubt that they are doing it to get some added revenue. The Section 8A tournament will also be held in warroad this year, and that is always a huge moneymaker also. so who knows, we'll have to keep our ears open <p></p><i></i>
hock21
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 6:43 pm

girls hockey

Post by hock21 »

I got a joke for you....boys HS with all the best players at ann arbor or juniors. The girls team will light them up 8-3 <p></p><i></i>
puckhead89
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:37 pm

Re: girls hockey

Post by puckhead89 »

Correction: Not "all" of the best players are at Ann Arbor and/or playing juniors.... <p></p><i></i>
Mitch Hawker
Site Admin
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:16 pm

Re: girls

Post by Mitch Hawker »

The Women's National team has played high school and bantam aged boys teams in the past.<br><br>They tied a bantam aged New England(?) District select team twice a few years back.<br><br>I have also heard secondhand that they played and lost to a Colorado Boys High School team a few years ago.<br><br>I am unsure as to whether checking was allowed in either case.<br><br>Having said that, I am appalled at the attitudes of some on this board and elsewhere about girls hockey. We need as many people playing hockey as we can get and I am glad that girls and women are playing the game of hockey at all levels. <br><br>Any new ice arenas (aside from the X) built in Minnesota in the past 5-10 years probably owe their existence to girls hockey, as boys hockey really hasn't grown at all in that time period.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Re: girls

Post by packerboy »

Good point Mitch but I agree with those who think this game is a joke. What is the point? <br><br>Hey, Ive got an idea, lets get a 50 year old washed up tennis player who is a hustler and put him up against a top womens player and get a lot of celebities and.......<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Puckguy
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 2:56 pm

Been Done:

Post by Puckguy »

Packerboy it may be before your time, but that's been done too. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Mitch Hawker
Site Admin
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 12:16 pm

Re: girls hockey

Post by Mitch Hawker »

One proven way to get better is to play against better competition. The only women's team in the world that provides much competition for Team USA is Team Canada and, no matter how big the rivalry, it would get old playing them every game.<br><br>Team USA played (and easily beat) a WCHA Women's all star team a month or so ago.<br><br>If you think of the game as a chance for Team USA to face better competition (and get some publicity) then the game makes a lot of sense from their point of view. <br><br>Warroad is either being charitable and contributing to one of our country's best hopes for gold in the upcoming Olympics, or they are getting some extra revenue as has been suggested. I would guess the former as I doubt they would clear much more than a regular high school game once Team USA's travel costs are covered.<br><br>Puckguy, I am sure you will generate some replies to that. I'll just say that Packerboy probably wishes he were young enough not to remember that tennis 'event' that he was alluding to.. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... wker>Mitch Hawker</A> at: 10/21/05 10:35 am<br></i>
Locked