HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

ooo tension

CarGuy wrote:typical st. cloud hockey if cathedral isnt involved....just not very exciting...

um okay haha

STC18 wrote:I'll take Tech 4-3, but this could go either way very easily.

kind of like you do?

haha just playing

I'm playing the wild card and saying they'll tie.

Dirty Dangler wrote:If apollo can get some production form other lines tonght it will be a 5-3 W but they nedd one more solid player like a grant spanier!!!

wow you're really funny!

Ben Dover wrote:Hey! come on now you guys, lets give him a break. For all you know he's still in the 4th grade!

He spells pretty well for a fourth grader then.
Can anyone confirm which grade level busch is in?

post back with more info...

OldTimer1234 wrote:I do not think that Moorehead is a test that Tech will even have a chance at passing IMO.

oldtimer seems a bit more biased than the rest of us, although we're all guilty of it.

i can almost feel the tension!

or maybe that's just the spacebar...

buschleauge wrote:sorry their last names arn't in the dictionary. only in small falls

he has a point.

yuu kneed two prctise!

what's wrong with this sentence busch?

how about you try at home to correct it.

the correct sentence was:

you need to practice!

wasn't the fun?

STC18 wrote: Now we need to work on some grammar, and he'll be a phenom gspan.

perhaps someday...

p.s. after the scc game someone busted my tail light.

karmas a _____. (expletive)

buschleauge wrote:techs is good, although its hard to beat the hanowski brothers and wes

one gold star for spelling!

Dirty Dangler wrote:I think they do but if they didn't have that grant spanier kid they wouldn't even be brought up in a debate.

lol is that sarcasm...

no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's! learn how to spell? hanowski I said that in an earlier thread as well. Maybe somebody needs to go back to spelling class in 3rd grade. :lol: woah. replying to my post jus...

nsideHocKey17 wrote:little falls doesnt lookk good. 7-1 eagles.

rofl.

stop being so biased, be a realist.

even if apollo can pull out a win, it won't be 7-1.
two solid first lines could end up being a wash, it might be up to the other lines to step up

buschleauge wrote:no question. unless the eagles get some production from their first line this one wont be close. Small Falls 6-1. go henouski's!

learn how to spell?
hanowski

and alright, maybe size matters a bit
it's more fun being a small guy playing out there though

size doesn't mean crap. Size means something to a lot of people. More for d-men than forwards... A pretty solid example. Matt Crandell of the Sioux City Musketeers. Damn good player. Turning in his second solid USHL season. 3rd in the USHL in plus/minus for d-men. 7th in the USHL in points for d-me...

hmmm

hmm

stxnpux wrote:
It all depends on how the spud goal tending will work out.

what's the tender situation in spudsville?

puckluck19 wrote:Tech is playin pretty well right now but to get anywhere in post season they need to compete with teams like moorhead. This should be a good test of what this team can do.

well said spence. so much speculation, only time and results will tell...

nsideHocKey17 wrote:Moorehed isn't cathedral. Spuds 9-0.

I think if tech can win thursday vs. sr, they'll go into the moorhead game confident.
crazier things have happened on a saturday

But Tech wasn't the reason why Cathedral couldn't catch a pass... or were they? sometimes if a team plays physical, the opponent can be scared to catch the puck. they "hear the footsteps", or maybe not. So much speculation... moorhead will be a great test for us saturday though, and sauk ...

don't count em' out so quickly

any thoughts? obviously tech is an underdog, but is on a hot streak.